The fund has already been around since Oct 10, 2022. While the investment adviser is changing from Tidal Investments LLC to Yorkville America Equities LLC, the main task of the investment adviser is to select and oversee the day-to-day subadviser. That was, and remains, Curran Financial Partners. Likewise, the actual managers (Messrs. Curran, Venuto, and Ragauss) survive the reorganization.
As the predecessor fund (i.e. the fund being reorganized) has been around for over three years, I don't see much reason why the fund should not continue to exist for at least another three. Well, there is the fact that while it got off to a good start (1st percentile in 2023, 3rd percentile in 2024), it has floundered a bit in the current administration (68th percentile in 2025 and 79th percentile YTD). But in terms of raw numbers, it hasn't underperformed by much in those years.

Actually, I've placed a couple of limit orders at $30 for SILJ and $60 for SLVR. Most likely too low, but I guess that we'll see. They both recoved a bit in after-hours. rono has been doing this for many years, is not a speculator, and I trust his judgement. In fact, we went through the Hunt brothers thing way back when.

To the ash-heap of ETFs within 3 years ... b/c there's no way they'll kill an ETF of 'his' during his term occupying the oval office.

Hi there. Others have already covered it, I think, but for avoidance of doubt: We ordinarily present total returns (not load adjusted). Also, we revised the Star Rating methodology some years ago to remove the load adjustment from the calculation. As such, it's not present there, either.
To my knowledge, the only return figures we display that are load-adjusted by default are post-tax returns (as I believe the SEC stipulates that calc be load adjusted, if I'm not mistaken).
I hope this is helpful.
Regards,
Jeff Ptak
Morningstar Research Services

US has no business to invade Iran. Have we anything learned from Vietnam and Iraqi ? At the end, there was no desirable political outcomes achieved, except it costed too many lives (service men & women and civilians). Where was the draft dodger with his bone spurs? Have he ever send his kids to any war?
It was George Bush’s mistake to topple Iraq the second time due to Hussan’s weapons of mass destruction. There was none after extensive search by the inspector. In the meanwhile, it destabilized that region where Iran and Iraq were arch enemy to each other. They fought a 10 years war that yielded nothing. Iran became stronger without Iraq. So what does US gained ? Think the bush administration was ill advised / lied to when they convinced Congress to authorize the invasion. We have come the full circle and will be making the same mistakes again.
As @observant1 and @Old_Joe posted above, the invasion will need to put boots on the ground and the consequences is clear to see from previous wars with Vietnam and Iraqi. Where is Congress ?

This is similar to what you find in prospectuses. They have a table of 1/5/10 year returns with and w/o loads, but all other data - calendar year returns, financials - exclude loads.
The impact of a load diminishes, or doesn't, over time depending on how you look at it.
If you buy a fund with a 5% load like SGENX, then the value of your investment will always be 100/105, or about 95.2% as much as it would have been without the load. A 4.8% reduction in value. No matter how many years you hold the investment.
(Though if you sell after just one year, there's an added 1% deferred sales charge, so your investment value is actually reduced to 100/105 x 99/100 = 99/105 or about 94.3% of what it would have been without the loads.)
On the other hand, viewed in terms of (geometric) average annual returns, a 5% load diminishes annual returns by (100/105) ^ (1/number of years).
So over 1 year, the average annual return is multiplied by 95.2% (ignoring backend load). The annual return is reduced by about 4.8%.
While over 5 years, the average annual return is multiplied by (100/105) ^ (1/5) or 99.0%. Annual returns are reduced by about a percent. Because that reduction takes place each year, after five years (and compounding) that adds up to the same 4.8% reduction in final value.
[^ means to the power of, e.g. 10^2 = 100]

...With the ballooning $38 trillion dollars deficit...
Confused here. I thought the Big Obscene Bill was going to raise the deficit over 10 years to $7.1 trillion.
Which is a doubling of the current state of affairs? (July, '25.) So we were told, eh?

The total gross national debt was $38.40 trillion as of 12/03/2025.
The "One Big Beautiful Bill" was estimated to increase budget deficits by $4.1 trillion
from FY 2025 - FY 2034 according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
These projections were made using CBO's January 2025 baseline and are subject to a degree of uncertainty.
https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/cbo-estimates-the-fiscal-impact-of-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/

Oh, my. But thanks for the clarification.

...With the ballooning $38 trillion dollars deficit...
Confused here. I thought the Big Obscene Bill was going to raise the deficit over 10 years to $7.1 trillion.
Which is a doubling of the current state of affairs? (July, '25.) So we were told, eh?

The total gross national debt was $38.40 trillion as of 12/03/2025.
The "One Big Beautiful Bill" was estimated to increase budget deficits by $4.1 trillion
from FY 2025 - FY 2034 according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
These projections were made using CBO's January 2025 baseline and are subject to a degree of uncertainty.
https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/cbo-estimates-the-fiscal-impact-of-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/

Yes. Foreign holdings are doing well this year. I have no equity etfs, foreign or domestic. My Australian equity CEF (IAF) is up over 11% YTD. Just sold a bit off in a rebalance. I think the biggest single driver here is the fall in the U.S. Dollar - about 10% lower against a basket of currencies over one year according to The Guardian. One way to boost a currency is for a country's central bank to raise interest rates. There is a strong correlation. So be careful what you wish for.
Not familiar with Baby Pips, but I do think their 3-point explanation of why the Dollar has weakened is accurate.
The U.S. has long outperformed foreign markets. At least 75% of the commentators / pundits I've listened to in recent months feel the U.S. equity market is overvalued relative to many foreign markets - particularly large caps. I don't have the expertise to know, but suspect they're correct.
Perhaps unrelated - but interesting. Microsoft (MSFT) tumbled 10% today. That had to upset a few fund carts!
@Obsevant1 - The performance of U.S. stocks versus foreign stocks has historically been cyclical.U.S. stocks will outperform foreign stocks for a number of years.
A transition occurs and then foreign stocks often take the lead for years.
The duration and timing of this cycle are, of course, unpredictable.
Yes. A bit like the tides. A single congressional bill, political pronouncement, central bank action isn't likely to alter the course. Over time, of course, those things add up and do exert a powerful effect.
I've spent hours this week looking for bargain stocks in the Pacific (non-China) area to add to my newly created stock basket. Frustrating because most of the good ones are up so much over the past year. I did bite this morning and picked up a few shares of MQBKY. Fairly valued, but the $150 share price makes it a bit challenging to integrate. (No fractional trading on ADRs)

...With the ballooning $38 trillion dollars deficit...
Confused here. I thought the Big Obscene Bill was going to raise the deficit over 10 years to $7.1 trillion. Which is a doubling of the current state of affairs? (July, '25.) So we were told, eh?

Started trading USFE - First Eagle US Equity ETF
FEMD - First Eagle Mid Cap Equity
I have owned from First Eagle SGIIX for years and FEGE when it started trading.
High quality managers.

Thanks for sharing.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/29/musks-20-billion-spending-plan-signals-tesla-of-yesterday-is-gone.html
They are eliminating two legacy models, after years of neglecting to refresh them. They are putting that plant to work building robots. And doubling-down on autonomous driving. And they apparently want to produce their own chips.
Automotive competition is coming on hard, and they seem set on side-stepping that challenge. Making their own chips makes certain sense, but will take a long time and is not guaranteed to succeed. It is not that different from them choosing to build their own battery facilities.
The robots? I can understand building industrial robots for specialized automation demands. But, household humanoid robots? Sure sounds like another wacky Musk fixation, that has no real market, like the Cybertruck.
Who is really going to buy these things? I have more of a smart home than probably 98% of people, and would never buy such a thing.

I have to wonder how many years we would need to stay there and how many more American service people would need to give their bodies and lives in the bottomless quicksand of Mideast religious and political antagonism.

Does the fact the First Eagle was bought in 2025 concern you? Years ago I had a good run with Sogen international,,, recall the manager was Evilard, I think.

"Fifteen years ago, 41% of the high-yield bond market was rated BB—the rung just below
investment-grade bonds, which have a lower risk of default—or better.
A decade ago, those bonds were 49% of the market.
Today, the credit quality of the high-yield bond market has improved,
with roughly 59% of the market rated BB or better."
"But that doesn’t mean those low-quality issuers have gone away.
For starters, there are still plenty of bonds in the high-yield market with higher default risks.
That said, many low-quality issuers are raising money elsewhere—namely, the leveraged loan market
and the private credit market, where they can borrow money at more flexible terms."
https://www.morningstar.com/bonds/why-there-is-lot-less-junk-high-yield-bond-market

Started trading USFE - First Eagle US Equity ETF
FEMD - First Eagle Mid Cap Equity
I have owned from First Eagle SGIIX for years and FEGE when it started trading.
High quality managers.

It has been very productive to diversify away from US, not just 2025, but likely 2026 as well. Others brought up how QQQ out-performed everything from developed to emerging market for the past 10 years. Hello, time has changed. With the ballooning $38 trillion dollars deficit and expensive (narrow breath) S&P500 index, one can get better returns without incurring additional market risk. By adding the current political risk, you all know the answer.
Institutional funds are moving elsewhere since 2025 and one can verify that on MFO Premium’s money flow.

to which one might refer to the usual disclaimers regarding "past returns are no guarantee...". Clearly, ex-U.S. (and small caps) have momentum going into 2026.
No one can predict if that continues or reverts. But, the momentum is there at present and needs to be recognized. Just as momentum is favoring many aspects of fixed income.

Interesting site.
I found this amusing...
What Do You Get With This (LIFETIME) Wall Street Journal Subscription?
10 years of uninterrupted, limitless, and personalized digital access for to the WSJ website.

That sounds like an offer from Vito Corleone. Recommend people avoid the "lifetime" subscription.
:)

I found Barron's & WSJ unresponsive and "sticky" in the past (difficult to cancel). Have had good luck with some of the resellers. Currently have a 1-year digital Barron's from top subscription deals. Have chosen not to link the site because it would pull up a page full of Ads. Savings may not be great. But you get a fixed term paid in full up front without automatic renewals. Works for me.

Interesting site.
I found this amusing...
What Do You Get With This (LIFETIME) Wall Street Journal Subscription?
10 years of uninterrupted, limitless, and personalized digital access for to the WSJ website.
So .. I should subscribe in my 80s, then? lol

Some EE bonds reach maturity after 17 or 20 years. They reach final maturity after 30 years. Only then are they automatically redeemed. Yes, it's confusing and much of what's written, even on the Treasury site, doesn't get it quite right.
Not all that different from Social Security talking about "full" retirement age, which is different from when you max out.

These EE bonds have 2 maturity dates
EE bonds that we issued from May 1997 through April 2005 have an original maturity date part way into the bond's 30-year life, as well as a final maturity date at the end of the bond's 30-year life.

Issue date of EE bond			Original maturity date
May 1, 1997 through May 1, 2003		17 years from issue date
June 1, 2003 through April 1, 2005	20 years from issue date

https://www.treasurydirect.gov/savings-bonds/ee-bonds/may-1997-through-april-2005/