The fees are definitely significant. A few families refuse to pay even the 10 basis points charged for TF funds. This is why Schwab and Fidelity have started charging TFs of $74.95 and $100 respectively for a few fund families such as Vanguard.

Most TF funds pay Schwab an annual asset-based fee, typically 0.10% annually of the average fund assets held at Schwab, although the fee can range up to 0.25% annually.
...
Most NTF funds pay Schwab's standard OneSource/NTF fund fee of 0.40% per year; however, the annual fee can range up to 0.45% of the fund assets held at Schwab.
...
The information on this website was last updated May 1, 2024 and is subject to change without advance notice.

https://www.schwab.com/legal/financial-and-other-relationships#panel--text-49651

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/92500/000119312524165867/d854673d497.htm
497 1 d854673d497.htm 497
STEWARD FUNDS, INC.
on behalf of its series
Steward Covered Call Income Fund
Steward Equity Market Neutral Fund
Steward Global Equity Income Fund
Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
Steward Large Cap Core Fund
Steward Large Cap Growth Fund
Steward Large Cap Value Fund
Steward Select Bond Fund
Steward Small Cap Growth Fund
Steward Values-Focused Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund
Steward Values-Focused Small-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
(the “Funds”)
Supplement dated June 21, 2024 to the Currently Effective Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated August 28, 2023
This Supplement reports the following changes to information in the Funds’ Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated August 28, 2023.
A.Upon the recommendation of Crossmark Global Investments, Inc., Steward Small Cap Growth Fund’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”), the Board of Directors of Steward Funds, Inc. has authorized, on behalf of Steward Small Cap Growth Fund, the Fund’s liquidation and termination, which will be effective on or about August 23, 2024 (the “Liquidation Date”). Accordingly, the Fund will redeem all of its outstanding shares on the Liquidation Date. The liquidation will be effected pursuant to a Plan of Liquidation and Termination. The operational costs of the liquidation, including the mailing of notification to shareholders, will be borne by the Fund but reimbursed by the Adviser, after taking into account applicable contractual expense caps then in effect by the Adviser to waive or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund. As the Liquidation Date approaches, the Fund’s assets will be converted to cash or cash equivalents and the Fund will not be pursuing its investment objective.
The Fund will be closed to new investors effective at the close of business on June 28, 2024. After that date, existing shareholders may continue to invest in the Fund and retirement plans that currently offer the Fund as an investment option may continue to offer the Fund to their participants until the Liquidation Date.
Prior to the Liquidation Date, shareholders may exchange their shares for shares of the same class of another Steward Fund or redeem their shares prior to the Liquidation Date, in each case at net asset value. Shareholders whose shares are redeemed by the Fund on the Liquidation Date will receive the net asset value per share for all Fund shares they own on the Liquidation Date. The exchange or redemption of Fund shares, on or before the Liquidation Date, generally will be a taxable event for shareholders, other than shareholders that hold Fund shares in a tax-advantaged account (e.g., an individual retirement account, 403(b), 401(k) or other defined contribution or defined benefit plan), but it is important that you consult your personal tax advisor and/or plan provider if you have any questions.
Shareholders that hold Fund shares through a financial intermediary should contact their financial intermediary if they have questions.,,

(Other firms charge transfer fees, so not a big surprise per se....but probably noteworthy for Vanguard)
Vanguard, the country’s second-largest financial-advisory firm, will start charging brokerage-account holders a slew of new fees starting July 1 — including a $100 processing fee to close an account or transfer assets to another firm. That fee, however, will be waived for customers with at least $5 million in assets.
The account-closure fee is a first for Vanguard, long a provider of low-cost investing options and a pioneer in passively managed index funds.
< - >
In addition to Vanguard’s new account-closure fee, the company will also charge $25 for broker-assisted trades of Vanguard funds (unless the customer holds $1 million or more in Vanguard assets or is enrolled in a Vanguard advisory service); $100 to process the deposit of physical share certificates; a 20% fee on funds recovered from class-action settlements on clients’ behalf; a 1% fee on gross dividends paid on foreign or American depository receipt assets held in U.S. dollars; and a $250 processing fee for research and removal of a restriction on securities in brokerage accounts.
< - >
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/vanguard-the-low-cost-investing-pioneer-will-now-charge-100-to-close-an-account-unless-youre-a-multimillionaire-09ef461c?mod=newsviewer_click

excluded are ... Treasury stock (buybacks that aren't cancelled).
Treasury shares are usually not counted (in the US) even before making a free-float adjustment. This is because indexes start with outstanding stock and Treasury shares are not outstanding. (They're issued but not outstanding, due to the buyback.)
From S&P Global Index Mathematics Methodology:

Shares Outstanding. This is the given company’s shares outstanding and provides total company level shares, as reported by stock exchanges, company press releases, and financial documents. Treasury shares are excluded

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/methodologies/methodology-index-math.pdf
OTOH, S&P's Float Adjustment Methodology gives a much more detailed and nuanced description of what is and isn't included in free float. Regarding Treasury stock it notes:

Due to local reporting patterns in some markets, S&P Dow Jones Indices may include treasury shares in total shares outstanding but exclude them from float.

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/index-policies/methodology-sp-float-adjustment.pdf
What it means by "local reporting" is country by country. Some countries include treasury shares in their outstanding stock calculations, others don't. MSCI clarifies this somewhat:

For most countries, treasury shares are included in the determination of the total shares outstanding, and therefore MSCI includes them in the calculation of free float. In countries like United Kingdom, USA, Canada where treasury shares are excluded from the determination of the total shares outstanding, they are accordingly not included in the calculation of free float.

https://www.msci.com/index/methodology/latest/FreeFloatData (pdf)
Conceptually, yogi's first sentence says it all:
The use of free-float in indexes is sensible as that is the float that is publicly available.
If one cares about the nitty gritty, see pp. 3-4 of the S&P Float Adjustment Methodology doc. (FWIW, it's fairly short but still more than I care to know.)

@stillers. Perhaps another universe is oddly phrased, but my financial life would be entirely different if I had a pension check roll in every month. Many decisions would be looked at differently.

Oh, now I get it!
And agreed, our collective SS and Pension incomes result in negligible, if any in some years, annual income gap. Makes a world of difference in all of our financial and investment decisions. We played it close to the vest in our first five years of retirement, but have swung for the fences in our last seven. To our credit though, we started planning for our retirements and this very situation on Day 1 of our first professional jobs in 1980. Well, I did at least. The missus got on board a wee bit later!

@msf said, ”If China is doing so well, should one be investing more in China, despite the political risks involved?”
That would be a contrarian bet for sure. All my sources (various financial writers / commentators / pundits) are really down on China as an investment, chiefly because of what they see as deterioriating relations with the U.S. However, in Orwell’s 1984 alliances were constantly shifting - sometimes overnight. So one never knows. And TMWOT the pundits as a group are wrong more often than they are correct on the big issues.

It seems as if that only works if the income for the special distribution was not accounted for in the TR prior to their distribution. I can't think of how that could happen over the course of a full year? If it were being accumulated, wouldn't the NAV have risen along the way?
This kind of gets back to the idea that distributions are 'free money' that have nothing to do with the price assigned to the individual shares. Invariably, anything you take out through distributions or selling reduces the value of what remains invested. Unless your TR is positive, this requires an ever-increasing percentage return to support a fixed distribution from a decreasingly-valued investment.
Corporations/businesses are simply not going to give you something for nothing. The idea that investments with a high distribution are somehow inherently more advantageous than ones which simply generate profits and increase price is, imo, a naive one. Of course, you can get price dislocations and there are certainly advantages to having a way to get predictable income from an investment at times when the investment is struggling. These are issues of convenience, however. and not of financial advantage.

About this allocation: 55% Moneymarket, 45% Fixed Income: 51% Treasury, 49% CDs
Note that while we have outrageously conservative investments at this time, I'm now 85. Our situation is almost identical to Tarwheel, and when we were at his point our investment spectrum was very much like his. It's only in the last couple of years that we've pulled in our horns. Why mess with a good situation?
There have been a number of threads/comments lately regarding investment simplification driven by a partner's lack of interest in financial affairs, and consequent inability to navigate within a brokerage website. My wife has always been interested in our financial situation, but has never really been comfortable with complex internet sites.
As a radio tech for SF 911 I was the "documenter" for our group. So I told myself that I needed to use that skill set to print a step-by-step for navigating the Schwab website.
I am both proud and happy to report that, armed with her new guide, my wife is now reasonably comfortable there and can now perform all of the basic operations. And she is eager to continue learning some of the more complex operations such as finding and purchasing CDs and Treasuries. That's next.

Confirmation statements for my UMB HSA Saver account have been unavailable for mutual fund purchases
made since 04/22. I first contacted UMB regarding this issue on 05/10.
I've sent or received six emails/phone calls related to this matter.
The Customer Care Manager was unable to provide an estimated resolution date when we last spoke on 06/05.
I've finally decided to send an email to the Chairman/CEO of UMB Financial Corporation
and to the President of UMB Financial Corporation.
I'm not familiar with UMB's internal applications/systems but it shouldn't take over a month to resolve this issue.
Edit/Add: The email to the Chairman/CEO and President was composed and scheduled to be sent on 06/18.
I cancelled sending this email and submitted a BBB complaint instead.
If the issue is not resolved within a reasonable time, I'll then send an email to the Chairman/CEO and President.

You wrote that you were "hoping with heavy inflows [MRFOX] also would be able to buy new or more promising investments."
During the period in question (the one ending Aug '23 with zero turnover), MRFOX increased the number of its positions by almost 20%. One of the new positions (Disney DIS) was clearly undervalued at the time according to M*. M* pegged its fair value around $145 while its price hovered around $90.
Given these facts, could you clarify your hopes and whether the addition of Disney failed to meet those hopes? Discover Financial Services DFS, also added by the fund in this period, was similarly undervalued.
Perhaps, since M* currently rates DIS and DFS as 3*, what you were hoping was that the fund would dump these recent acquisitions, seeing as they have met some sort of target?
---
Many people assume that low or zero turnover means that a fund isn't changing its positions - a misunderstanding that your post reinforced, intentionally or not. I attempted to address that misunderstanding by providing M*'s definition of turnover and by using MRFOX as a case study.
One wouldn't know the precise definition by looking at MRFOX's website, as its footnote says only that "turnover is a measure of how frequently assets within a fund are bought and sold by the manager."

@stillers. Perhaps another universe is oddly phrased, but my financial life would be entirely different if I had a pension check roll in every month. Many decisions would be looked at differently.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/720309/000119312524160798/d844723d497.htm
497 1 d844723d497.htm AMG FUNDS III
Filed pursuant to Rule 497(e)
File Nos. 002-84012 and 811-03752
AMG FUNDS III
AMG GW&K High Income Fund
Supplement dated June 13, 2024 to the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information,
each dated May 1, 2024
The following information supplements and supersedes any information to the contrary relating to AMG GW&K High Income Fund (the “Fund”), a series of AMG Funds III (the “Trust”), contained in the Fund’s Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, dated as noted above.
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has approved a plan to liquidate and terminate the Fund (the “Liquidation”), which is expected to occur on or about September 11, 2024 (the “Liquidation Date”). Effective on or about June 14, 2024, it is expected that the Fund will begin selling its portfolio investments and will invest the proceeds in cash and cash equivalents, in anticipation of the Liquidation. Proceeds of the Liquidation are expected to be distributed to shareholders of the Fund promptly following the Liquidation Date in full redemption of each shareholder’s shares of the Fund.
Effective immediately following the close of business on June 13, 2024, the Fund will no longer accept investments, except for investments made through existing asset allocation programs investing in the Fund, and shares purchased pursuant to automatic investment programs, such as automatic investments through 401(k) plans and reinvestments of any dividends and distributions. Those shareholders investing in the Fund through one of the exceptions described above may continue to purchase shares of the Fund provided that such transactions settle prior to the Liquidation Date.
A letter will be sent to shareholders who hold shares directly with the Fund (“Direct Shareholders”) setting forth the various options and instructions with respect to the Liquidation and the distribution of Direct Shareholders’ redemption proceeds. Any Direct Shareholder may elect to have redemption proceeds sent to them via check. Direct Shareholders may also elect to exchange their Fund shares into the same share class of any other fund in the AMG Funds family of funds that is open to new investors (subject to minimum initial investment requirements as described in such fund’s prospectus). Shareholders who hold their shares in the Fund through a financial intermediary should contact their financial representative to discuss their options with respect to the Liquidation and the distribution of such shareholders’ redemption proceeds.
The Fund intends to distribute its accumulated net capital gains and net investment income, if any, to shareholders of record of the Fund as of the close of business on June 17, 2024; these distributions may be taxable to shareholders who do not hold their shares in a tax-advantaged account such as an IRA or 401(k).
PLEASE KEEP THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/879947/000119312524160793/d849966d497.htm
497 1 d849966d497.htm AMG FUNDS II
Filed pursuant to Rule 497(e)
File Nos. 033-43089 and 811-06431
AMG FUNDS II
AMG GW&K Enhanced Core Bond ESG Fund
Supplement dated June 13, 2024 to the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information,
each dated May 1, 2024
The following information supplements and supersedes any information to the contrary relating to AMG GW&K Enhanced Core Bond ESG Fund (the “Fund”), a series of AMG Funds II (the “Trust”), contained in the Fund’s Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, dated as noted above.
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has approved a plan to liquidate and terminate the Fund (the “Liquidation”), which is expected to occur on or about September 11, 2024 (the “Liquidation Date”). Effective on or about June 14, 2024, it is expected that the Fund will begin selling its portfolio investments and will invest the proceeds in cash and cash equivalents, in anticipation of the Liquidation. Proceeds of the Liquidation are expected to be distributed to shareholders of the Fund promptly following the Liquidation Date in full redemption of each shareholder’s shares of the Fund.
Effective immediately following the close of business on June 13, 2024, the Fund will no longer accept investments, except for investments made through existing asset allocation programs investing in the Fund, and shares purchased pursuant to automatic investment programs, such as automatic investments through 401(k) plans and reinvestments of any dividends and distributions. Those shareholders investing in the Fund through one of the exceptions described above may continue to purchase shares of the Fund provided that such transactions settle prior to the Liquidation Date.
A letter will be sent to shareholders who hold shares directly with the Fund (“Direct Shareholders”) setting forth the various options and instructions with respect to the Liquidation and the distribution of Direct Shareholders’ redemption proceeds. Any Direct Shareholder may elect to have redemption proceeds sent to them via check. Direct Shareholders may also elect to exchange their Fund shares into the same share class of any other fund in the AMG Funds family of funds that is open to new investors (subject to minimum initial investment requirements as described in such fund’s prospectus). Shareholders who hold their shares in the Fund through a financial intermediary should contact their financial representative to discuss their options with respect to the Liquidation and the distribution of such shareholders’ redemption proceeds.
The Fund intends to distribute its accumulated net capital gains and net investment income, if any, to shareholders of record of the Fund as of the close of business on June 17, 2024; these distributions may be taxable to shareholders who do not hold their shares in a tax-advantaged account such as an IRA or 401(k).
PLEASE KEEP THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/912036/000119312524160800/d807981d497.htm
497 1 d807981d497.htm AMG FUNDS IV
Filed pursuant to Rule 497(e)
File Nos. 033-68666 and 811-08004
AMG FUNDS IV
AMG Beutel Goodman International Equity Fund
Supplement dated June 13, 2024 to the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information,
each dated March 1, 2024
The following information supplements and supersedes any information to the contrary relating to AMG Beutel Goodman International Equity Fund (the “Fund”), a series of AMG Funds IV (the “Trust”), contained in the Fund’s Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information, dated as noted above.
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has approved a plan to liquidate and terminate the Fund (the “Liquidation”), which is expected to occur on or about September 11, 2024 (the “Liquidation Date”). Effective on or about June 14, 2024, it is expected that the Fund will begin selling its portfolio investments and will invest the proceeds in cash and cash equivalents, in anticipation of the Liquidation. Proceeds of the Liquidation are expected to be distributed to shareholders of the Fund promptly following the Liquidation Date in full redemption of each shareholder’s shares of the Fund.
Effective immediately following the close of business on June 13, 2024, the Fund will no longer accept investments, except for investments made through existing asset allocation programs investing in the Fund, and shares purchased pursuant to automatic investment programs, such as automatic investments through 401(k) plans and reinvestments of any dividends and distributions. Those shareholders investing in the Fund through one of the exceptions described above may continue to purchase shares of the Fund provided that such transactions settle prior to the Liquidation Date.
A letter will be sent to shareholders who hold shares directly with the Fund (“Direct Shareholders”) setting forth the various options and instructions with respect to the Liquidation and the distribution of Direct Shareholders’ redemption proceeds. Any Direct Shareholder may elect to have redemption proceeds sent to them via check. Direct Shareholders may also elect to exchange their Fund shares into the same share class of any other fund in the AMG Funds family of funds that is open to new investors (subject to minimum initial investment requirements as described in such fund’s prospectus). Shareholders who hold their shares in the Fund through a financial intermediary should contact their financial representative to discuss their options with respect to the Liquidation and the distribution of such shareholders’ redemption proceeds.
The Fund intends to distribute its accumulated net capital gains and net investment income, if any, to shareholders of record of the Fund as of the close of business on June 17, 2024; these distributions may be taxable to shareholders who do not hold their shares in a tax-advantaged account such as an IRA or 401(k).
PLEASE KEEP THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE

Chat conversations are very much with a human and the service that I've gotten from them has been just fine, thank you. You talk about people as if they were your personal servants. I'd surely pity anyone unfortunate enough to have to work for someone like you.

I have spoken to many people on the phone including in my ex work thru complicated issues. I never got any complaints and I always got great reviews. Nobody, as well as I, were servants.
But, I expect someone to be a pro at handling customers and getting the right answers.
So let me repeat AGAIN, the best service is usually by talking to a human. That's my experience over many years working in IT in several businesses, including many years in financial institutions and as a customer. If it's important I demand it in writing. That saved me a lot of future problems and time of what was promised.
If you feel otherwise, you can do it your way, others can try both.
Just for the record, you made a harsh judgment of me without knowing anything about me while I never posted anything about you.

I've never used Schwab's chat, but I have had great luck with Verizon, SiriusXM, T-Mobile, Amex, and other chat-based customer representatives. The advantage is that you can keep the log if there are any disputes down the road. These chat lines are run by 'people' as well ... so if you're decent to them, they'll likely be decent/efficient to you. I don't care HOW I interact with them as long as my problem/concern is addressed promptly and in a professional manner.
ProTip: When using chat, if you think it's going to be an 'uncomfortable' conversation with likely attempts to upsell, (eg, cancelling cable TV) just type your problem (or a set of responses) out in NotePad or TextEdit first and then blow it into chat as needed based on the flow of the chat. Lots of folks don't know that browser-based chat reps often can see you typing / correcting / rephrasing things in the chat window and adjust their pitch to you on-the-fly based on if you seem undecided or waffling.
Edit: Schwab CSR got back to me on one of my enquiries, but I had to read it 3x to understand which issue they were responding to b/c the non-boilerplate part of the response read more like a technical trouble ticket, not a response to a brokerage account question.

Chat conversations are very much with a human and the service that I've gotten from them has been just fine, thank you. You talk about people as if they were your personal servants. I'd surely pity anyone unfortunate enough to have to work for someone like you.

I have spoken to many people on the phone including in my ex work thru complicated issues. I never got any complaints and I always got great reviews. Nobody, as well as I, were servants.
But, I expect someone to be a pro at handling customers and getting the right answers.
So let me repeat AGAIN, the best service is usually by talking to a human. That's my experience over many years working in IT in several businesses, including many years in financial institutions and as a customer. If it's important I demand it in writing. That saved me a lot of future problems and time of what was promised.
If you feel otherwise, you can do it your way, others can try both.
Just for the record, you made a harsh judgment of me without knowing anything about me while I never posted anything about you.

Post-Conference Notes by YBB
Rates are maintained - fed funds 5.25-5.50%, bank reserves rate 5.4%, discount rate 5.5%. Inflation target remains +2% average. Base-effects have caused a slight bump in recent inflation data. Confidence in progress on inflation is low, so higher rates for longer can be expected. Neutral/equilibrium rates is a theoretical concept that is good only in hindsight. Ad-hoc evidence of price reductions is just that.
Treasury QT continues at the reduced level of -$25 billion/mo, but MBS QT remain at -$35 billion/mo.
Monetary policy is restrictive, although economic data remain flat now.
Labor market remains strong, but it isn't overheating.
Housing is weak. The OERs (owners' equivalent rent) remain elevated. There is an overall shortage of houses.
Consumer spending has been rising, so is the consumer debt. Household wealth is also rising. But many consumers are unhappy as lower inflation doesn't mean lower prices.
Banks are in good financial shape.
Dollar is strong, but that is Treasury's responsibility.
Internal review of the Fed will start later in the year.
New SEPs (Summary of Economic Projections) were released.
https://ybbpersonalfinance.proboards.com/post/1512/thread

While it does not give an actual overall rating, quarterly financial call reports are are prepared and submitted by banks to a repository. Uniform Bank Performance Reports (UBPRs) are generated based on the information submitted from those call reports which have financial ratios in comparison to their peers.
You can check the FFIEC website for public information.
https://www.ffiec.gov/

I like the idea of looking at NRSRO ratings such as Fitch. Financial institutions will usually give their ratings on their website.
For example, here's Morgan Stanley Bank's ratings. Morgan Stanley has its own credit ratings and separate ratings of its subsidiaries. Scroll past the former to get to the Morgan Stanley Bank ratings.
I also like Weiss (not an NRSRO). From WSJ, May 6, 2010 (subscription required):

Weiss Group LLC, an independent research provider, bought back a financial-institutions rating business it previously sold and intends to apply for the unit to become a "nationally recognized statistical ratings organization," or NRSRO, the group's chairman said.
The unit, Weiss Ratings, produces "financial-safety ratings" for hundreds of U.S. banks and insurance companies and doesn't accept compensation from the companies it rates.
...
The ratings from Weiss are meant to be an indicator of the risk and financial soundness of banks and insurance companies. They are similar to the "financial strength ratings" that NRSROs like Moody's Investors Service and A.M. Best currently provide on financial institutions.

Here's Weiss' rating of Morgan Stanley Bank, and Weiss' page describing its bank ratings in detail.
DepositAccounts rates Morgan Stanley Bank a B+ for health. The single 3* rating that you see is just a subjective rating by a user apparently disappointed with the rate offered on a CD. It has nothing to do with safety, which end users are ill equipped to comment on.
https://www.depositaccounts.com/banks/morgan-stanley-bank-national-association.html#health

FYI - The link takes one to the login page.
If you're already logged in (requires a Merrill account) the link takes you to the cited page. If you have a log in but are not logged in, then when you log in on that login page you'll land on the cited page.
If you don't have a login, you can still get the list of available MMFs from the next link (rates and mins). But you won't know what their settlement date is or by what hour you must submit orders for execution on the indicated day (ranging from 11:45AM to 5:00PM(!)).
Why it matters is that settlement dates affect when cash is needed for trades. I've been unable to do an exchange between two MMFs in the same family simply because they had different settlement days. I had to sell one fund and subsequently buy another. What other timing/trading impacts the differences in settlement days have I leave as an exercise.
Among other things, the inability to invest pennies means that small amounts of cash (earning virtually nothing) will gradually pile up. If your fund is paying $N.75 per month, then you'll have 75¢ in cash after one month, $1.50 in cash after two months, etc. I expect loose change in a couch but not in a financial institution. Material or not, this is a shortcoming that I've not seen at any other institution.