It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I think their equity ETFs follow their multi-manager 'sleeve'-oriented house approach to investing. It's not flashy and rarely knocks it out of the park, but I've been fairly pleased w/how the AF team runs their funds, several of which I own in very large amounts. I've not looked closely but all 4 ETF managers have been with Capital for over 20 years so presumably they've been managing/co-managing other funds.Thanks for those ideas @rforno. CGGO looks promising. I have not replaced the global growth funds that swooned in 2022, i.e., Kristian Heugh and MS funds. Do you know if the managers of CGGO run an equivalent MF strategy?
I don't see the situations as symmetric. Banks borrow short and invest long. The risk they voluntarily assume is being locked into more depreciating long term investments (as rates rise) than they have in short term deposits (solvency issue) and experiencing a sizeable net outflow of short term deposits (liquidity issue), notably a bank run.a bet on a long-term CD at a high interest rate has it's own risks for the issuing credit union or bank, and that risk is sort of the opposite from what took down Silicon Valley Bank recently. If the Fed's interest rates come down in a year or two that issuer will be stuck paying out at a high rate but itself having to invest for income at a lower rate.
Make that the last five years.BIAWX and POAGX although the last 2 years of performance are giving me pause.
https://www.depositaccounts.com/blog/2019-study-cd-early-withdrawal-penalties-changed.htmlSome banks and credit unions have language in their CD disclosures that allows them to refuse an early withdrawal request. Although CD early withdrawal refusal by a bank or credit union is rare, it is possible. Review the CD disclosure for this type of wording.
I have to ask since this tropic comes up often. Why does a Schwab or Fidelity person, which I think a majority of us are, care about M*? There are pretty good tools in each brokerage. And for fund analysis, MFO is "really" good. Maybe the best if you have Premium. I haven't used M* directly in years. Am I missing something?
You get what you pay for.
I'm using Premium, but not paying. Morningstar today leaves a lot to be desired. But give them an extra day or two, and their numbers most often catch-up to reality. At this point, I continue to use Morningstar because of the convenience of knowing my way around the website. I can quickly navigate to the particular item I want to look at. There ARE some factoids which M* includes, which I never see elsewhere--- like the rank among peers in terms of the performance of Fund X, whatever fund it is that you're looking at. ...Ah, but there are often mismatches: Morningstar slides Fund A or B or C in together with other funds where it doesn't truly belong.I have to ask since this tropic comes up often. Why does a Schwab or Fidelity person, which I think a majority of us are, care about M*? There are pretty good tools in each brokerage. And for fund analysis, MFO is "really" good. Maybe the best if you have Premium. I haven't used M* directly in years. Am I missing something?
You get what you pay for.
The above was excerpted from a current Associated Press article, and has been edited for brevity.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve extended its year-long fight against high inflation Wednesday by raising its key interest rate by a quarter-point despite concerns that higher borrowing rates could worsen the turmoil that has gripped the banking system.
“The U.S. banking system is sound and resilient,” the Fed said in a statement after its latest policy meeting ended. At the same time, the Fed warned that the financial upheaval stemming from the collapse of two major banks is “likely to result in tighter credit conditions” and “weigh on economic activity, hiring and inflation.”
The central bank also signaled that it’s likely nearing the end of its aggressive streak of rate hikes. In its statement, it removed language that had previously said it would keep raising rates at upcoming meetings. The statement now says “some additional policy firming may be appropriate” — a weaker commitment to future hikes.
The Fed included some language that indicated its inflation fight remains far from complete. It noted that hiring is “running at a robust pace” and “inflation remains elevated.” It removed a phrase, “inflation has eased somewhat,” that it had included in its statement in February.
Speaking at a news conference Wednesday, Chair Jerome Powell said, “The process of getting inflation back down to 2% has a long way to go and is likely to be bumpy.”
The latest rate hike suggests that Powell is confident that the Fed can manage a dual challenge: Cool still-high inflation through higher loan rates while defusing turmoil in the banking sector through emergency lending programs and the Biden administration’s decision to cover uninsured deposits at the two failed banks.
The central bank’s benchmark short-term rate has now reached its highest level in 16 years. The new level will likely lead to higher costs for many loans, from mortgages and auto purchases to credit cards and corporate borrowing. The succession of Fed rate hikes have also heightened the risk of a recession.
The troubles that suddenly erupted in the banking sector two weeks ago likely led to the Fed’s decision to raise its benchmark rate by a quarter-point rather than a half-point. Some economists have cautioned that even a modest quarter-point rise in the Fed’s key rate, on top of its previous hikes, could imperil weaker banks whose nervous customers may decide to withdraw significant deposits.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla