Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Liberation Day! What’s the play?
    As detailed somewhere on this/other threads, we SOLD 1/2 of our stock allocation on Monday in anticipation of the tariff disaster. So we are sitting on a pile of dry powder.
    We have re-deployed about half of the proceeds into a CD, three dedicated bond funds and started a position in Alternative fund QLENX.
    Dip buying is a topic that has come up recently on a few threads.
    See my link and comments here:
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/comment/190277#Comment_190277
    FWIW, we remain hesitant to ADD any new money, or in this case, re-deploy Monday's stock sale proceeds at this time. If we do ADD back, we will likely DCA those proceeds back in over the rest of 2025, or DUMP back in on a baby/bath water day.
    Recession probabilities are climbing as is the insanity level in DC. We are electing to be as reasonably safe as possible given the extraneous circumstances that face us all for the next 3.75 years.
    If an investor didn't get outta the way of the freight train that we all should have seen coming down the tracks, I just dunno what the best strategy would be at this point.
    But ADDing new/re-deployed $ at this point just doesn't feel right.
  • In Europe, You Can Be Sued for Not Taking Action on Climate Change. In the U.S., It’s the Opposite.
    "Of course anyone paying the least bit of attention to the multiple climate disasters of recent years would know this."
    @AndyJ- I know you didn't mean it this way, but some might interpret that as saying that Trump and his financial dwarves have absolutely no clue about the CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX. I don't think that we're supposed to say things like that any more because it might hurt FD1000's feelings.
  • In Europe, You Can Be Sued for Not Taking Action on Climate Change. In the U.S., It’s the Opposite.
    Meanwhile, Günther Thallinger, a Board member and former CEO of Allianz SE, one of the world's largest insurance companies, says the climate crisis is on track to wipe out huge chunks of economic value.
    Snips:
    The world is fast approaching temperature levels where insurers will no longer be able to offer cover for many climate risks ... (and) without insurance, which is already being pulled in some places, many other financial services become unviable, from mortgages to investments.
    “This applies not only to housing, but to infrastructure, transportation, agriculture, and industry,” he said. “The economic value of entire regions – coastal, arid, wildfire-prone – will begin to vanish from financial ledgers. Markets will reprice, rapidly and brutally. This is what a climate-driven market failure looks like.”
    No governments will realistically be able to cover the damage when multiple high-cost events happen in rapid succession ...
    Of course anyone paying the least bit of attention to the multiple climate disasters of recent years would know this.
    Yes, the issue absolutely affects economy and investment.
  • Global markets in turmoil as Trump tariffs wipe £1.5tn off Wall Street
    Following are excerpts from a current report in The Guardian:
    Economists say levies of 10-50% have dramatically added to the risk of a worldwide downturn
    Global financial markets have been plunged into turmoil as Donald Trump’s escalating trade war knocked trillions of dollars off the value of the world’s biggest companies and heightened fears of a US recession. As world leaders reacted to the US president’s “liberation day” tariff policies demolishing the international trading order, about $2tn (£1.5tn) was wiped off Wall Street and share prices in other financial centres across the globe.
    Experts said Trump’s sweeping border taxes of between 10% and 50% on the US’s traditional allies and enemies alike had dramatically added to the risk of a steep global downturn and a recession in the world’s biggest economy. The sell-off swept the globe, sending exchanges plunging in Asia and Europe.
    When New York trading opened, the S&P 500 index of the US’s leading companies fell by as much as 4.3% in morning trading, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq fund down 5.1%. Meanwhile, the US dollar hit a six-month low, falling by about 2.2% on Thursday morning, amid a growing loss of confidence in a currency that had previously been considered the safest in the world for most of the past century.
    Warning clients to beware a “dollar confidence crisis”, George Saravelos, the head of foreign exchange research at Deutsche Bank, said: “The safe-haven properties of the dollar are being eroded.” The heaviest falls in share prices on Thursday were reserved for US firms with complex international supply chains stretching into the countries that Trump is targeting with billions of dollars in fresh border taxes.
    Apple, which makes most of its iPhones, tablets and other devices for the US market in China, plunged by as much as 9.5%, along with steep declines for other large multinationals including Microsoft, Nvidia, Dell and HP. Commodities fell sharply, including a 7% plunge in oil prices, reflecting growing concerns over the global economic outlook.
    In a typically defiant response on Thursday, Trump used his Truth Social platform to declare that the his plan was working. “THE OPERATION IS OVER! THE PATIENT LIVED, AND IS HEALING. THE PROGNOSIS IS THAT THE PATIENT WILL BE FAR STRONGER, BIGGER, BETTER, AND MORE RESILIENT THAN EVER BEFORE. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
    Tariffs will fall heavily on some of the world’s poorest countries, with nations in south-east Asia, including Myanmar, among the most affected. Cambodia, where about one in five of the population lives below the poverty line, was the worst-hit country in the region with a tariff rate of 49%. Vietnam faces 46% tariffs and Myanmar, reeling from a devastating earthquake and years of civil war after a 2021 military coup, was hit with 44%.
    Analysts warned that garment and sports shoe makers, which rely heavily on production in south-east Asia, face rising costs, which will push up prices for consumers around the globe. The share prices of Nike, Adidas and Puma all fell steeply. Analysts said Trump’s measures would raise the average tariff, or border tax, charged by the US to the highest level since 1933, in a development that threatened to sink the US into recession while increasing living costs for consumers.
    The non-partisan Tax Foundation thinktank said it estimated the plan would represent a “$1.8tn tax hike” for US consumers, which would cause imports to fall by more than a quarter, or $900bn, in 2025. While the measures will hit the US hard, researchers at the consultancy Oxford Economics said they could sink global economic growth to the lowest annual rate since the 2008 financial crisis, barring the height of the Covid pandemic.
    The French president, Emmanuel Macron, said Trump’s decision to impose tariffs of 20% on EU goods was “brutal and unfounded”, while Germany’s outgoing chancellor, Olaf Scholz, called it “fundamentally wrong”. Spain’s prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, said the “protectionist” tariffs ran “contrary to the interests of millions of citizens on this side of the Atlantic and in the US”.
    The EU is thought to be preparing retaliatory tariffs on US consumer and industrial goods – likely to include emblematic products such as orange juice, blue jeans and Harley-Davidson motorbikes – to be announced in mid-April, in response to steel and aluminium tariffs previously announced by Trump.
  • Anyone notice a connection between the market and a certain politician today?
    All strictly my opinions here...YMMV.
    For us, SELL time was Monday (which we did, 50% of our stock allocation), but no later than Wednesday COM.
    We were pretty sure Thursday would bring bloodshed.
    We feared/still fear Friday's UE (and future UE reports) could add some kerosene to the fire.
    We think a recession and a BEAR are coming to a country near us relatively soon.
    I guess one could SELL some now, but when I miss selling before the Big C, I usually wait to BUY the Bear.
    If any stock exposure is to be bought now, for us, it would be Staples and/or Alternatives, though we are toying with adding a wee bit to FXAIX and/or PRWCX.
    With some of Monday's stock SELLs proceeds, we bought a CD, three dedicated bond funds and QLENX Tues and Wed.
    Bottom Line: We think this is going to get FAR worse before it gets ANY better. One MUST have a LT investment horizon to be BUYing, especially broad market stuff, anytime soon.
    ----------------------------------------
    NOT my opinion, but the narrative of some of the analysts/posters I follow:
    BUYing the dip has not worked for the last about 2 years (recent MW study)
    NASDAQ is clearly rolling over (Katie Stockton)
    https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/04/01/off-the-charts-whats-next-for-tech-in-q2.html
    Death Crosses for all major indexes are weeks away (yogi).
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/63661/death-crosses#latest
    Russell entered Bear Market land today (CNBC).
    Recession fears are mounting and with recessions come Bear Markets (Just about everybody)
  • Liberation Day! What’s the play?
    FWIW, all SELLs (per above posts) have been entered today.
    Reduced stock exposure by ~50%.
    Parking proceeds in VMRXX, FZDXX and will likely BUY a coupla new rungs on 5-yr CDs ladder that virtually guarantees a net positive TR in 2025.
    Kudos to @larryB for this thread.
    (Sadly) Timely and actionable.
    EDIT: NOT saying this strategy is correct for anyone other than me and the missus.
    BUT, our #1 goal this year, after two monster stock gain years under a REAL president, was to NOT allow the buffoon's asinine fiscal policies (read, orange brain farts) to cause us to be anything but net positive for the year on 12/31/25. And that goal has virtually been guaranteed with these moves today. Plus, we will sleep MUCH better thru year-end!
    What's that old saying? Oh, yeah.
    Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn from time-to-time.
    Thanks again to @larryB for this thread - it truly was the final catalyst for us to act so boldly on Monday.
    Monday's stock sale proceeds were used as follows Tues/Wed:
    Most went as intended to VMRXX and FZDXX.
    Bought another 5-yr CD ladder rung
    Bought first dedicated bond OEFs (3) since selling all of them circa 2022.
    Opened a position in long/short fund QLENX.
    IF, the blood letting continues today up to the close, MAY redeploy some of the proceeds back into FXAIX or PRWCX, having strategically side-stepped today's sell off. But probably not as we are becoming reasonably convinced that a recession and bear are well in the works.
    And, taking suggestions on how to thank @larryB for helping me and the missus save five figures today.
  • Tariffs haven’t leaked at Liberation -56
    Years ago I worked in a lab that was tight on space. One team leader, when space would open up, seemed to know it before anyone else and would grab the space before it was available by going to the next higher boss and tell him that he had a visiting important (for whatever reason) scientist coming and the space needed to be reserved for them. The rest of us adopted the code words "it is reserved for Dr. Comings when he comes" to explain why we needed the space but it remained empty for what seemed forever.
    It may seem off topic but the tariff seems to have a rising pain with a promise of a Dr. Wealth Comings in the distant future. The open ended "when it is coming" is a feature to be desired.
  • Tariffs haven’t leaked at Liberation -56
    @JD_co
    Trade with Russia has dropped from $30B to $3B over the last 4 years. Pay attention to sanctions rolling back going forward.
    Interesting Fact sheet:
    https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/imports/russia
  • Tariffs on Screws Are Already Hitting Manufacturers
    @Crash- For some twenty years I did my best to "manage" a small-appliance service business, with a number of employees. You would have to have been in business to understand that for smaller operations it is rarely possible to "absorb" significant added costs- the profit margin is simply not great enough to allow that.
    OK, I'll believe that. So, in that case, we're not talking about tariffs reducing profits, but actually creating red ink where there was none, prior. OK. :)
  • Tariffs on Screws Are Already Hitting Manufacturers
    @Crash- For some twenty years I did my best to "manage" a small-appliance service business, with a number of employees. You would have to have been in business to understand that for smaller operations it is rarely possible to "absorb" significant added costs- the profit margin is simply not great enough to allow that.
  • Private-Equity Wants a Piece of Your 401(k)
    Vanguard already partners with HarbourVest to offer private equity investing for its clients.
    Clients must have $5 million in Vanguard assets, in addition to meeting qualified purchaser
    and accredited investor regulatory standards¹.
    I assume Vanguard seeks a PE strategy accessible to a larger segment of the investor population.
    https://investor.vanguard.com/wealth-management/private-equity
    ¹ Clients must meet the qualified purchaser and accredited investor standards under federal law,
    typically showing that their net worth is over $1 million or their annual income has been more than
    $200,000 in the last two years.
  • Tariffs on Screws Are Already Hitting Manufacturers
    Following are edited excerpts from a recent report in The Wall Street Journal:
    Levies on steel and aluminum are reaching deeper in supply chains and spawning a hunt for domestic producers
    Rising costs for screws are rippling through manufacturing supply chains. President Trump’s tariffs implemented this month on steel and aluminum imports have scrambled the supply chains of companies that make everything from car parts to appliances and football helmets to lawn mowers. The latest tariffs cover a wider range of imports, including the screws, nails and bolts that serve as the connective tissue in manufacturing.
    That has set off a hunt to find domestic supplies of some of manufacturing’s smallest components. Manufacturing executives said the U.S. doesn’t have the plants to churn out the amount of steel wire or screws and other fasteners needed to displace imports. The production capacity we need doesn’t exist here in the U.S.,” said Gene Simpson, president of fastener maker Semblex. “It’s a select group of suppliers.”
    About $178 billion of steel and aluminum products imported by the U.S. last year are now subject to a 25% tariff, according to Jason Miller, a supply-chain management professor at Michigan State University: “It’s a shockingly large number of parts”. American companies also can no longer petition the Commerce Department for tariff exemptions on specific products that aren’t sufficiently available in the U.S. The enlarged tariff pushes up the cost of a 10-cent screw from China to 17 cents for an importer.
    At AlphaUSA, about half the of the materials that the Michigan-based auto-parts manufacturer purchases are fasteners. Many of them are made outside the U.S., particularly in Canada, which is now subject to the 25% duty after being exempted for years. President Chuck Dardas saidt he company’s customers are very religious about their quality standards, and often request specialized parts for assembly lines. Dardas added that many U.S. companies that make fasteners purchase the steel for them from Canada as well.
    Price-sensitive customers
    The situation for the auto industry became more complicated Wednesday, when Trump announced an additional 25% levy on imports of car and auto parts. The effects of the tariffs are expected to be felt quickly, as many suppliers have said they are unable to absorb added costs from new levies. And companies that use screws and other metal parts covered by tariffs say their customers won’t tolerate price increases. Some construction contractors may delay projects until they get a handle on how to blunt the effects of import duties.
    Simpson’s firm Semblex produces fasteners for automobiles, industrial lighting, farm equipment and heavy-duty commercial trucks. To make those fasteners, the company uses specialty steel wire. It imports more than half of the wire it uses, mostly from Canada. As tariffs make imports more expensive, American steel wire producers are raising their prices at the same time. Simpson said cost increases for steel are difficult to quickly pass along to customers, especially in the automotive industry where prices are often locked in monthslong contracts.
  • Private-Equity Wants a Piece of Your 401(k)
    Key is the new CEO Salim Ramji.
    He came from BlackRock/BLK. Vanguard may want to be a low-cost disruptor in private-equity. Larry Fink/BLK wants to bring private-equity to the masses. Looks to be a dream combo.
    Not a sure thing. Remember that at one time, Vanguard wanted to be a low-cost disruptor in the annuities world, but it gave up only after a few years. And a few more years later, it dumped the entire variable-annuity business on Transamerica, retaining only the VA fund management.
    Ramji is now in India to review a new tech development center in India although it doesn't offer any funds within India.
    Critical for Vanguard will be to improve its customer service and quit the M-F 8-8 support operations. But we haven't seen any announcements for those.
    This may not be your grandfather's Vanguard, or even Bogle's Vanguard.
  • Asian Markets: Stocks Sink as Trump’s Tariff Threats Weigh on Confidence
    https://www.reuters.com/world/china-japan-south-korea-will-jointly-respond-us-tariffs-chinese-state-media-says-2025-03-31/
    Bold added.....
    BEIJING, March 31 (Reuters) - China, Japan and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs, a social media account affiliated with Chinese state media said on Monday, an assertion Seoul called "somewhat exaggerated", while Tokyo said there was no such discussion.
    The state media comments came after the three countries held their first economic dialogue in five years on Sunday, seeking to facilitate regional trade as the Asian export powers brace against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs.
    Japan and South Korea are seeking to import semiconductor raw materials from China, and China is also interested in purchasing chip products from Japan and South Korea, the account, Yuyuan Tantian, linked to China Central Television, said in a post on Weibo.
  • Tariffs
    Today's PBS News Hour episode includes a segment about tariffs and their impact on manufacturing.
    University of London trade economist Ha-Joon Chang
    "It is going to take a lot of time, and you don't have that time. You have run down the industrial base over the last four decades. It cannot be built up in two years or whatever tariff policies that you have. In the meantime, things will be very expensive, especially if you are putting tariffs on the main trading partners like Mexico and Canada.
    And can people tolerate any more inflation?"

    Harvard Business School, Professor Willy Shih
    "Let's say you wanted offshore production from the U.S. to China. You had to set up a new factory. You had to hire the work force. You had to train the work force. You had to bring in suppliers. You had to set up your logistics. And what paid for that was, you got lower cost of product."
    "That's going from a high-cost country to a low-cost country. Now, if you want to bring stuff from a low-cost country to a high-cost country, and you have to set up a factory and you have to hire the work force, and you have to train the work force and bring in your suppliers, what's going to pay for it? Your product cost is going to be higher."

    Robert Zoellick, U.S. trade representative under George W. Bush, economic adviser under Bush I
    "So, the problem with Trump's approach is, it combines incoherence and protectionism. And you have to look at both parts. So the protectionism will add costs. And then you also have the retaliation."
    "We tried this in the 1930s. We raised tariffs to an average of 59 percent, and other people hit back. We had a trade surplus, but we also had unemployment at 25 percent. So it's a policy that reverses 70 years of America's international economic leadership."
    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/examining-trumps-claims-that-tariffs-will-revitalize-american-manufacturing
  • Tariffs
    Excerpts from today's WSJ Market Talk:
    "President Trump’s plans to impose 25% tariffs on imported vehicles will hike the average price of cars by as little as $5,000 and as much as $10,000 to $15,000, Wedbush analysts say in a research note. The analysts say the tariffs will wreak havoc on auto supply chains, since even automakers that make cars in the U.S. source around half of their parts from abroad. That means it will take around three years to move 10% of the auto supply chain to the U.S., costing hundreds of billions that will be passed directly to the consumer and push down demand, the analysts say."
    "European equity prices have not fully priced in the risk of tariffs escalation and they therefore risk falling further, UBS strategists say in a note. Stocks in sectors likely to be impacted by tariffs could decline by a further 10% as earnings outlooks are revised lower, the strategists say. 'A lot of this will depend on the price elasticity of demand given the most sensitive stocks tend to be in areas with lower competition.' These include pharmaceuticals and higher-end consumer sectors such as luxury and high-end vehicles, UBS says."
  • This Investing Trend Is Your Friend—Until It Isn’t
    I never used momentum indexes; I only used typical funds but looked at the best risk/reward ones and kept changing according to uptrends, and several parameters.
    How to do that? It's the $64K. I developed my system for years, just as I developed my timing one for retirement. None is mechanical. See (link).
    I have posted for over 15 years on several boards, and I can say that there are maybe 5-7 people who do it well. The rest don't believe it, don't want to put in the effort, or don't care.
  • This Investing Trend Is Your Friend—Until It Isn’t
    ""Momentum makes less sense to a thoughtful, long-term investor."
    MMM...this investor has been using momo successfully since 2000 because it works if you know how to do that, and it's not that easy.
    The other choice is to have some diversification LT with minimal trades, which is pretty good for most.
    Something that is not easy doesn't mean it's undoable. You must have a system that works and keep tweaking it. It doesn't mean it's perfect; just better is enough to get better results.
    If I had stocks, I would have a higher % in Value, Europe, China, and gold.
    If momo doesn't work, how come US LC were great during 1995-2000 + 2010-2024 while Value, SC, and international were better during 2000-10. Each one lasted for years.
    Generally, when US LC do well, it's difficult to beat them per risk-adjusted performance. When they are not, it takes more effort to find other categories and I would advise being more diversified.
    Investors who don't believe it, don't practice it, and don't trade it can't be good traders.
  • Liberation Day! What’s the play?
    Agree.
    Third world countries have a better experiential knowledge of stagflation. US had only two (non-consecutive) years in the 70s of stagflation. So, media talking about it more now is more out of fascination (not sure that is the right word but you get the idea).
    Now that I had a chance to read the thread, I agree with the general sentiment - the world in turmoil. I get that evidence pointed to it before hand (i.e., not news) but that does not make it easy for people to stomach it or deal with it when the event arrives. The good news is humans are wired for optimism (which is also the cause for their undoing sometimes!).
    @stillers, Disturbance, Detox, etc. are only some of the words used. Also, just knowing their priorities, an immediate vibrant economy is not a goal or a priority. Looking at human history with similar priorities also tells me the economy has to take a hit, which is why I gave this the highest probability. To keep this thread clean, I will stop here.
  • Liberation Day! What’s the play?
    FWIW, all SELLs (per above posts) have been entered today.
    Reduced stock exposure by ~50%.
    Parking proceeds in VMRXX, FZDXX and will likely BUY a coupla new rungs on 5-yr CDs ladder that virtually guarantees a net positive TR in 2025.
    Kudos to @larryB for this thread.
    (Sadly) Timely and actionable.
    EDIT: NOT saying this strategy is correct for anyone other than me and the missus.
    BUT, our #1 goal this year, after two monster stock gain years under a REAL president, was to NOT allow the buffoon's asinine fiscal policies (read, orange brain farts) to cause us to be anything but net positive for the year on 12/31/25. And that goal has virtually been guaranteed with these moves today. Plus, we will sleep MUCH better thru year-end!