Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • investing in oil?
    I only just last week initiated a miniscule toe-hold in COP ConocoPhillips, and will very slowly grow it. (Their DSPP is about the best I've seen in terms of simplicity. The charges all come at the back-end, when selling, and it's not unreasonable at all.) I bought at $53.12, and a bit more will be recorded tomorrow (already sent and noted as "pending,") and the stock is today at $48.21. I intend this as a long-term position. If it takes even a few years for oil to bounce back, I'll be growing my dividend, which is being reinvested. 5.5% yield....In the back of my mind, I keep remembering the airlines barely able to stay afloat, (and the airline bankruptcies!) until oil swooned, and now I note HA at about 30 for 40 X where it was just several years ago. In the same vein, I don't want to look back and see that I missed the best entry-point for the biggest oil E & P company in decades or maybe my lifetime. (Jeez, if only I had money to invest, back in the '90s!) COP is shortly to have a conference call re: 2016 plan, and has a cost-cutting plan already underway, re-aligning its portfolio into cheaper sources of product. The company says in a "forward-looking statement" that they expect to become profitable again, in 2016.
    https://www.flashratings.com/stocks/3529-COP?in=true
  • Dividend Funds Struggle To Keep Pace With S&P 500
    FYI: Dividend mutual funds have underperformed the S&P 500 over the past 10 years through Nov. 30. In a volatile 2015, their performance has been especially laggard.
    In the decade ended Nov. 30, dividend mutual funds tracked by Morningstar Inc. averaged an annual return of 6.36%.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MjEwOTA2MTA=
    Enlarged Graphic:
    http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=webLV1208.gif&docId=784206&xmpSource=&width=1000&height=1063&caption=&id=784211
  • Crash coming?
    People have been calling for another major decline for years.
  • welcome to the discussion a/k/a help board for MFO's premium tools
    ok, now 3 lc funds, 15 years or older age and tenure, and 1% er or less...
    image
    yields 40 funds...
    image
  • welcome to the discussion a/k/a help board for MFO's premium tools
    now, 3 lc funds, 15 years or more with manager tenure 15 years or more...
    image
    yields 77 funds...
    image
  • welcome to the discussion a/k/a help board for MFO's premium tools
    now, 3 lc funds age 15 years or more...
    image
    yields 326 funds...
    image
  • The Best Mutual Funds To Buy Right Now!
    Nevertheless, Money, Kiplingers, U.S. News, and all the other mags will have their list of funds to buy NOW. It must sell magazines, but it is shoddy journalism.
    Hi Bob....I have a soft spot for Kiplingers.
    About 30 years ago, my dad bought me a subscription to that magazine. It served as the starting point for learning about the need to save serious money, and how to go about investing.
    It may not be the most sophisticated source of information, but it fills a need and provides needed information to many. It truly provided a benefit to me, and still does.
    press
  • Morningstar $69 One year special
    I have not been a premium subscriber for many years but I did find the top holding detail useful (that is the top holdings and how much was held by each fund as slick mentioned) along with duration information on fixed income. The information could have changed over time as it has been a long time since I was a premium member. I feel I get everything needed without being a permium member including duration detail.
  • Morningstar $69 One year special
    For me, numero uno of the specific features by far is the premium portfolio info for oef's, etf's, cef's. Without that, I wouldn't pay for the rest of the features.
    Otherwise, I occasionally use fund analyst reports (more value there for etf's, for which the coverage is much wider and more detailed) and the premium fund screener (and once in a blue moon, that includes some of their pre-selected screens on the fund page and the ones they use to structure some articles). Used to use x-ray more, but it's not all that useful for a portfolio with a substantial slug of fixed income. (I did use stock intersection a lot in the past, but almost never now.)
    Bottom line, I could get everything I get from premium here & there, elsewhere, but it's a time saver, for what I want, to get it in one place. As far as value goes, I haven't paid the full asking price in years - although the last time I renewed, my request for a better rate got a chilly reception and some argument before they granted it.
    By the way, the link in the OP goes to a standard "for more info" page, no mention of the $69 rate.
  • Debunking 4 Common Myths Advisers Have About Mutual Funds
    image
    Source: Morningstar data as of 9/30/15; calculations by Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.
    "For each month, beginning in February 2003, we tracked the funds that received each of the five possible star ratings and then compared the performance of those funds to the median fund in the corresponding Morningstar category over the next three years. The chart shows you the percentage of funds of each rating that did better than that median category peer over the next three years."
    Ha--- love it!! :)
  • Grandeur Peak reduces expenses on two funds
    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/915802/000091580215000101/grandeurpeakfeecapfootnoteup.htm
    h497 1 grandeurpeakfeecapfootnoteup.htm
    FINANCIAL INVESTORS TRUST
    Grandeur Peak Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
    Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund
    SUPPLEMENT DATED DECEMBER 4, 2015 TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED AUGUST 31, 2015
    Grandeur Peak Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
    The footnote under the Table titled “FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE FUND” on page 2 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
    ** Grandeur Peak Global Advisors, LLC (the “Adviser”), has agreed to waive and/or reimburse fees or expenses in order to limit Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement (excluding acquired fund fees and expenses, brokerage expenses, interest expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses) to 1.95% and 1.70% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for the Fund’s Investor Class Shares and Institutional Class Shares, respectively. This agreement (the “Expense Agreement”) is in effect through August 31, 2016. The Adviser will be permitted to recover, on a class- by-class basis, expenses it has borne through the Expense Agreement to the extent that a Fund’s expenses in later periods fall below the expense cap in effect at the time of waiver or reimbursement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Fund will not be obligated to pay any such deferred fees and expenses more than three years after the end of the fiscal year in which the fee and expenses was deferred. The Expense Agreement may not be terminated or modified prior to August 31, 2016 except with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
    Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund
    The second footnote under the Table titled “FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE FUND” on page 10 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
    ** Grandeur Peak Global Advisors, LLC (the “Adviser”), has agreed to waive and/or reimburse fees or expenses in order to limit Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement (excluding acquired fund fees and expenses, brokerage expenses, interest expenses, taxes and extraordinary expenses) to 1.60% and 1.35% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for the Fund’s Investor Class Shares and Institutional Class Shares, respectively. This agreement (the “Expense Agreement”) is in effect through August 31, 2016. The Adviser will be permitted to recover, on a class- by-class basis, expenses it has borne through the Expense Agreement to the extent that a Fund’s expenses in later periods fall below the expense cap in effect at the time of waiver or reimbursement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Fund will not be obligated to pay any such deferred fees and expenses more than three years after the end of the fiscal year in which the fee and expenses was deferred. The Expense Agreement may not be terminated or modified prior to August 31, 2016 except with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
    * * *
    Please retain this supplement for future reference.
    ttp://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/915802/000091580215000101/grandeurpeakfeecapfootnoteup.htm
  • Equinox funds and EQCHX in particular
    @AndyJ I think you are spot on, at least as far as yesterday's results are concerned. The WSJ states that the euro had the biggest one day percentage gain against the dollar in six years. My MFs presumably have positions in favor of the dollar.
    I knew my MFs had currency exposure, but not to the degree presumably reflected in yesterday's results. Leads me to wonder whether I want to be this exposed to currency fluctuations...
  • Is that my head on the platter? Pretty sucky today.....
    As of market close (12/03/2015) Old_Skeet is down according to M* portfolio manager by about 1.5%. In comparison, the Lipper Balanced Index is about even for the year. I have a good number of funds in the Growth & Income and Growth Areas of my portfolio that are generating positive returns; but, overall they can not offset the others that are down. However, my broker generated monthly statements indicate I have positive returns thus far this year due to special investment positions (spiffs) that I have utilized from time-to-time. With this, my trading activity has put me net positive through November.
    With a current high P/E Ratio (23.1 TTM) on stocks (S&P 500 Index) along with as reported earnings in decline, a strong dollar and expectations of a FOMC rate increase I'm thinking it is going to be a bad year for my portfolio. I could reduce my portfolio's equity allocation downward another 10% and still be within my equity allocation range of 40% to 60% equity; however, that would put me extremely overweight cash as I am already above my cash allocation range now of 10% to 20% along with being light fixed income (currently at 20%) with an allocation range of 20% to 40%. In addition, other assets as defined in Xray remain at 5%.
    So, it is what it is. Some years you make good money, some years you do not. In addition, M* portfolio manager indicates that my portfolio's mutual fund holdings combined and on average are currently off their 52 week highs by about 8.5% as I write. With this, I've got some funds that have been extremely poor performers, thus far over the past 52 week peroid, with the worst performers being my emerging market and global infrastructure funds. I am glad I sold my gold and commodity funds, a while back, as they would also have been detractors.
    In addition, @Old_Joe, I am thinking that @Junkster will make money this year along with @Ted. Then there is @bee that is an active investor ... she may as well. I am sure there are also a few others ... so, let's not leave out @Scott.
    And, so it goes ...
  • Janus' Other Bond Bigwig Is Leaving
    VF - I agree, at age 47 at the height of your career you don't quit - especially someone as good as Gibson Smith was - something else is going on. I've owned several Janus funds in taxable accounts, some for 20 years, but have been paring them down in recent years and am left with JANIX, JNGLX, and JNPSX. Although they have nothing to do with the fixed income side, I'm still concerned about Janus' corporate culture.
    As far as my balanced funds go I'm not worried - when interest rates rise, the balanced funds will buy new bonds at higher rates to offset the loss in principal when their existing bond holdings mature. My balanced funds I own have short durations and mostly corporate debt.
  • Janus' Other Bond Bigwig Is Leaving
    I think it is bigger than that. I think bond funds in general are not going to be the place to be for the next 10 years. People don't leave at age 47 to spend time with their family. No, they don't. They don't. The smartest managers are those who know how good they've had in their "area of expertise" and quit at the top.
    I'm going to seriously reconsider all my bond and balanced funds. Cash might be better option. Also looking at GTSOX and TALSX, but so far not been convinced enough to pull the trigger.
    On a side note, Weil is pals with Gross. I can't help but wonder there is a something cooking in bond-world at Janus. I'm frankly SEEin the rat before I'm smelling it.
    Full disclosure, I own JUCDX and JPVDX.
  • Telcom Fund and the Internet of Things
    @scott- With respect to entities like American Tower, there are some "yes, buts". I'm speaking here from my experiences as a retired radio technician. It's important to understand the differences between "high level" and "low level" towers: the "level" indicates the altitude with respect to the surrounding terrain, and of course in that context high and low has the obvious meaning.
    American Tower owned a number of the high-level transmission towers (and associated radio equipment facilities) that San Francisco uses for Public Safety communications, and I did acquire a bit of information regarding those sites. High-level sites are typically located on mountaintops and on very tall buildings, and are used for two purposes: broadcast (think AM or FM broadcast radio and TV), and microwave relay for almost any sort of communication you can imagine. The height advantage, combined with high-powered transmitters, allow broadcasts from these sites to cover a large geographical area. The microwave is very narrow point-to-point, typically between tower locations.
    While it's certainly true that cellular and data communications are proliferating like crazy, virtually all of that expansion is located at low-level sites. There are several reasons for this. First, the frequencies available for this type of RF communication are limited- there is a much greater demand for radio-frequency (RF) channels than there is available radio spectrum. Second, this type of radio use does NOT benefit from either a high-level site nor from high-powered transmission.
    The two issues are related: to maximize the usage of the limited RF spectrum, low powered transmission is used from low-level sites- the opposite of radio broadcasting. Because the sites are low-powered and low-level, they cover a tightly defined small geographical area, commonly called a "cell". This allows maximal reuse of the RF spectrum, as the same frequencies can be reused in nearby cells. Which brings us back to American Tower.
    The small cell size means that the transmission sites for this type of equipment can be located on low-level buildings, and even on what we would think of as "tall telephone poles". Church steeples are a favorite choice. Look around as you travel, and you will see huge numbers of these installations, characterized by clusters of special antennas that sort of resemble thick police shields. Those transmission sites are typically leased from the owners of the individual properties, and not a large entity such as American Tower.
    From what I've heard American Tower is doing OK lately, which is a definite change from some years ago. But be aware of what their limitations are with respect to cellular voice and data transmission.
  • our December issue has posted
    The apparent text section in question from the December 1 commentary is below and is opening of the paragraph just above "Briefly Noted", which is #17 in the content list.
    I do agree with the two previous comments; that I also don't understand who to attribute this statement to.....as noted by @VintageFreak...."Who is Several of us?"; followed by @JohnChisum and his question/statement.
    "Several of us have taken the position that we’re likely in the early stages of a bear market. The Wall Street Journal (12/01/2015) reports two troubling bits of economic data that might feed that concern: US corporate capital expenditures (capex) continue dropping and emerging market corporate debt defaults continue rising. For the first time in recent years, e.m. default rates exceed U.S. rates.
    Briefly Noted . . ."
    Regards,
    Catch
  • Telcom Fund and the Internet of Things
    HP Enteprise (HPE) article on the trends in Telecom. I like FSTCX and PRMTX to own exposure to these trends.
    The six major disruptions that will drive the most change in Telecommunications by 2020 are:
    Integration
    Thingification
    Mobility
    Saturation
    Security
    Ascension
    Let's visit each of these in turn, and take a look at the world of Telecommunications five years into the future.
    https://hpematter.com/issue-no-4-spring-2015/content-barons-smart-dust-skynet-6-telecommunications-disruptions-2020
  • our December issue has posted
    Several of us have taken the position that we’re likely in the early stages of a bear market. The Wall Street Journal (12/01/2015) reports two troubling bits of economic data that might feed that concern: US corporate capital expenditures (capex) continue dropping and emerging market corporate debt defaults continue rising. For the first time in recent years, e.m. default rates exceed U.S. rates.
    Who is Several of us?
  • Fairholme distribution and its potential consequences for the fund
    Isn't a taxable distribution just an accountant's way of saying, "You made a profit...now you need to pay your taxes on that profit."
    True, except in this case, the "person" that made the profit is the fund, and not necessarily the investors. FAIRX was down 2.72% in 2014 (compared to +13% for the S&P 500). So far this year, it is down another 2.39% (compared to +3% for S&P). So folks who bought into FAIRX during the last two years are probably not feeling all that "profitable" with their FAIRX taxes.