Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Despite Trump’s Claims, Grocery Prices Are Rising
    Obama did not promise to cut premiums; he promised to cut the rate of growth in premiums. ...
    Years ago when Obama was making his $2,500-reduction claim, he didn’t always make it clear that he wasn’t talking about a straight price cut, but rather a slower growth of premiums than what would have happened without the ACA or other changes to the health care system. In other words, the president claimed that premiums would increase at a lower rate than they had been expected to before.
    https://www.factcheck.org/2015/10/bush-misleads-on-premium-growth/
    While health care costs have continued to increase since President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010, they’ve done so at a slower rate than in the years before the law was passed.
    A 2021 study published in JAMA found that out-of-pocket healthcare expenses increased at an average of 3.4% a year from 2000-2009 and 1.9% a year from 2010-2018, after the ACA.
    https://econofact.org/factbrief/fact-check-have-healthcare-costs-risen-faster-since-the-affordable-care-act-was-passed
    There are valid criticisms of the ACA. Growth rate of premiums is not one of them. A valid complaint is that the ACA originally had little in the way of total healthcare cost containment. Another is that the cliff on premium subsidies (sharp drop to zero subsidies if income goes $1 over 400% of poverty level) left insurance unaffordable for some. Under Biden, the latter was addressed until the current Congress let the enhanced subsidies lapse.
    https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/inflation-reduction-act-health-insurance-subsidies-what-is-their-impact-and-what-would-happen-if-they-expire/
    See also: A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few? (2017)
    Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28339427/
    Full paper (28 pages): https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NDMwMg==&journal=104
  • steve romick manager fpacx fund
    In a M* interview, Steve Romick revealed that he was 13 years old in 1976.
    Romick will turn 63 years old sometime this year.
    Mark Landecker and Brian Selmo have co-managed FPACX alongside Steve Romick since June 2, 2013.
    All three co-managers have invested over $1M each in the fund.
  • steve romick manager fpacx fund
    Romick of FPACX is in early 60s. He has been doing this for 30+ years.
  • steve romick manager fpacx fund
    im curious about the age of steve romick and about his retirement plans. im considering buying the fund but dont want to buy it if he is retiring in a few years. if he left i dont think the fund would be a good fund without him
  • Despite Trump’s Claims, Grocery Prices Are Rising
    JD: Your health insurance premiums are increasing by +50% because we no longer receive ACA credits, you say? Hmmmm.
    Blame Obama, who promised Americans they could keep their doctors and health plans under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and that costs would decrease.
    It was one of the biggest lies about spending in the last 50 years.
    So now, you want subsidies. How about the Gov paying for 100% HC? And why not pay for all the education and transportation? It's coming to NY.
    ===============
    Can't get better when Dems discuss inflation. Under Biden we had the highest inflation in 4 decades. It will take years to fix it.
    The latest CPI was 2.7%. The Dem economists promised very high inflation. They lied as usual.
  • ETFs Are Eating the World
    Investors have been moving toward index funds for years. While the existence of ETFs may have accelerated this migration it would have happened in any case. So this is not just a ETF phenomenon. Additionally, 401k plans have been slow to include ETFs in their offerings, though that is changing.
    The AUM of price weighted funds is minuscule (relative to total market size). So I wouldn't give them too much thought. The only etf tracking the DJIA is DIA, with $44B. (Other DJIA-based funds are leveraged or not price-weighted or ...) While the Nikei 225 is another well known price weighted index, there are no US based ETFs tracking it.
    https://etfdb.com/index/nikkei-225-index/
    Market cap weighted funds have both a large cap bias and a growth bias. Their growth bias is significant enough that ETFdb considers them (e.g. VOO, VTI, VT) large cap growth funds.
    https://etfdb.com/etfdb-category/large-cap-growth-equities/
    Proponents of equal weighted funds often reference the large cap and growth biases of market cap weighted funds in making their case. Here's a recent (May 2025) piece by S&P comparing equal weighted and market weighted S&P 500 indexes.
    One, the cap-weighted S&P 500 has a bit of a growth bias. So if you look at its overlap relative to some very popular growth funds, you'll see that overlap is approaching 50%. ...
    The second dynamic that's present is we've seen a lot of valuation stretch in the cap-weight S&P 500 relative to equal weight. So equal weight is relatively inexpensive. The discount right now is about 25% if you look at P/E ratio. Over time, that number is more close to parity.
    https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/index-tv/article/examining-equal-weight-performance-in-challenging-markets/
  • Precious Metals
    "A 29.83% gain in six weeks—not too bad!"
    Thanks, @Observant1, but all the credit goes to @rono. I did have the guts to increase my original couple of thousand original stake on a couple of pretty good dips, but other than that rono is The Man.
    @Sven- Thanks for the compliment, but as I just said, it's all rono's doing. I know less than nothing about the uranium situation, but as I'm sure that you also know from general news reporting there is consideration of re-starting one or two decommissioned generating reactors, and in a few years hopefully there will be a few new simplified design reactors coming on line. If there's money to be made on the uranium fuel side I would be very surprised if major insider long-term money has not already been active on that. Very good question, I think.
  • ETFs Are Eating the World
    I recently read that while ETFs are extremely popular with retail investors, big investors have moved on to direct- or customized- indexing. So, in 5 years, direct-indexing may be eating the world (-:)
    What's great about direct-investing? Better control and TLH.
  • Precious Metals
    @bee - Never disrespect the penny. Franklin's famous proverb probably appeared in his 1732 Poor Richard's Almanac. If allowed to compound annually at 5% interest over the 294 years since then, his penny would be worth nearly $17,000 today.
    Calculator
  • Precious Metals
    Great summary @rono. You've done incredibly well in the metals over many years. Snow up north? More than we care to talk about!
  • Precious Metals
    Howdy Hank,
    You kids have any snow up there?
    Civil instability is one of many reasons for increased demand. Geez, it's the perfect storm for a bull market in silver.
    Industrial demand is huge. Silver is the best conductor and reflector and a great antibiotic. Solar paste goes into every solar panel. It's in all EVs and AI electronics. Also used in photography and medicine. None of these users gives a rats ass about price. No silver - no production.
    You have enormous debasement and de-dollaring trade. Ever since Russia invaded Ukraine and we seized their dollar denominated assets, every other sovereign country has been diversifying out of the dollar. Buying gold, silver, Euros, crypto, etc. in order to reduce their outsized holdings of dollars. As to debasement, there are many folks no trusting fiat currencies in light of the huge deficits, continued spending, low interest rates and the restart of quantitative easing.
    Now we can chat about the civil unrest/survivalist demand. Yeppers. Hell, I started going to the mattresses when that Cheeto POS go reelected. Now I'm trying to reduce my holdings in and of the dollar. Foreign hedged bond funds, what. A pot-full invested in the miners (silver, gold, and now, copper).
    All this demand faces a restricted supply. Artificially low prices over the past several decades have discouraged exploration and expansion of silver mining. Seventy percent of all silver comes a a byproduct of lead, zinc and copper. A new mine is 7-10 years out. And unlike gold, silver gets used up in industry. Gold never goes away. Silver does.
    So, you've got a supply/demand issue that central banks cannot resolve. They can print more fiat currency but not silver.
    The GSR is now 49 to 1 and 50 is a huge threshold. Silver is about to go thru $100 an ounce. A silver 1964 is now worth $17 in bullion.
    BTW, in the past year, silver is up 208% and YTD it's +30.75%.
    and so it goes,
    peace,
    rono
  • ETFs Are Eating the World
    "Exchange-traded funds, which have existed for just 35 years,
    are booming at the expense of traditional mutual funds.
    More than 1,000 ETFs launched in the U.S. last year with the industry’s assets
    reaching $13.5 trillion, according to FactSet. December saw record inflows and launches."
    "Their invention was like dropping a new apex predator into the investment habitat—an unfair fight.
    A cumulative $3 trillion flowed out of traditional mutual funds between 2015 and 2024 with a similar sum
    moving to ETFs, according to the Investment Company Institute."
    "Yet there are now more ETFs than stocks.
    Given the choice between making money from genuine usefulness or gimmicks,
    most new ones resort to the latter. It’s a jungle out there."
    https://trk.wsj.com/view/6965296053e1c001a9787e7bpxh6q.a2j1/f62a2c24
  • Precious Metals
    Not into the metals. Just don't hang on to anything that's already appreciated so much. I did a lot of trading in physical silver bars in the late 70s. One day a pair of jerks who were parked in the coin dealer's lot surveying the clientele trailed me home. Enough said. Mostly cured me of physical stuff. To this day I don't like be out in public wearing a watch worth over $100.
    Got bored during the winter of 2017 and assembled a collection of about a dozen Morgan Silver Dollars. ISTM silver was trading around $15 back then. Used reputable online sellers. All except 2 are securely encased with an ID number from PCGS or NCG the top grading agencies. Most have been "imaged" so potential buyers can access the site, enter the coin's ID and pull up photos. Coins are not bullion. Big difference. But my experience from the 70s is that they tend to run together.
    Few months ago found a tarnished 1-ounce silver bullion coin in a junk drawer. No idea where it came from. With silver over $70 I walked into a small local coin shop. A young fella ahead of me cashed in a newish looking stack of silver bullion coins. Took quite a while. He received a bit over $1600 cash. Then I offered up my sole coin to the proprietor who offered $60 - far below spot. I accepted. He copied down my DL# on a form I was required to sign "to confirm this for my boss". I dunno. It didn't appear to be for tax reporting. Took a photo for my records.
    Yesterday with silver north of $90 I returned. While not professionally graded / certified like the rest of my collection (which are kept in a bank vault), the two Morgans I had with me are gorgeous and would grade MS 60 or better. Fair value around $120 - $130 each. (A Morgan Dollar contains a bit over .77 troy ounce silver.) He declined to make an offer, but instead asked for my "bottom line". I said $200 for the pair. He quickly handed them back without even taking a close look. I mentioned each contained more than $70 worth of bullion. His reply - "Yes, it's so expensive no one is buying it."
    Why the run up? All the reasons @rono and others have cited have validity. I'd say at this point the main driver is the prospect of civil instability across the U.S.as the election nears. I hope that doesn't happen, but many probably view the metals as "last resort" survival money. I expect a hard correction someday. But that could be months or years away. I limit my gambling to $1 wagers on DraftKings!
  • Trump threatens to block ExxonMobil from Venezuela after CEO calls country ‘uninvestable’
    "...he wouldn't be around to see those profits, as building the infrastructure would take years."
    PLEASE! The sooner, the better.
  • Trump Prosecutors vs Fed Chair Powell... GOP Senator Tillis will oppose Powell's replacement

    @larryB: Shelby Foote reminded viewers (K. Burns' The Civil War) that our system is based on compromise. Often, and from the beginning, it's distasteful compromises--- like allowing slavery to continue. What happened in the pre-1861 years leading up to the war was that the "leaders" were unable or unwilling to compromise any further.
    Translation: the Southern elite would not relinquish their slaves as slaves, and (maybe) just agree to EMPLOY them. (Well, we know from our School D-A-Z-E what kind of life sharecropping was, eh?). Call it PROTECTING VESTED INTERESTS, to be blunt about it.
    Somehow, "the poor must always help the rich to save the British Army." I stole those words from a verse in an Irish Rebel song. But the parallel fits: here in the USA, somehow, the working class is so easily manhandled, pushed, gaslighted and convinced to go along with the elitist agenda. More recently, it is simply the most generic and foundational vested interest which the elite want to protect: to protect their money from taxes, which would ostensibly go to serve the common good. Clearly, they just don't care about the common good.
    Of course, the argument could always be made that too many tax dollars get wasted or spent on a bridge to nowhere. That's eternal and undeniable. But it doesn't wash away our collective responsibility to each other. By definition, that's what a society IS.
  • Social Security: Fixing Before We Deplete It's Reserves
    ...I don't comprehend the "replacement percentage" stuff. And people should not have to work until 69, that's fecal in a rat-fart sort of way. I seem to recall it was Ray-guns who decided to keep the distinct ledger for SS, but to mix the existing balance available in together with the rest of the budget, and that's a big reason why this "crisis" exists, too. Then he proceeded to triple the deficit. And what just happened last July? The One Big Grotesquely Ugly Bill. In ten more years, the debt will be $7.1 Trillion. And how do you even COUNT that, ever? And what is the ratio between that number and GDP? (I recall when the standard was GNP). TAX THE RICH. How much crap can you buy? How will some of those people even find the time to SPEND their disposable income? Here's a great idea: let's rediscover the concept of the COMMON GOOD. Alas, what happened last July tells me it is completely dead and buried.
  • ICE OFFICER Jonathan Ross, GoFundMe page + Bill Ackman, Pershing Sq. hedge, $10K donation
    Several former law enforcement officers stated Ross put himself in the harm’s way by putting his arms inside a vehicle and standing in front or the back. He got hurt years badly ago when he was dragged by his arm inside a moving car. Yet he never learned the lesson. Darwin rules again here.
    Someone in the administration likely told these goons that they have immunity for being careless. Does Steve Miller or DOJ Barbie really care ?
  • Trump Prosecutors vs Fed Chair Powell... GOP Senator Tillis will oppose Powell's replacement
    Like all of trump's lawfare, it will likely implode.
    https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/13/jerome-powell-donald-trump-investigation-00722860
    "Trump’s loose talk about Comey and James helped sink those prosecutions, at least for now, and it has already complicated other criminal and civil cases, including the effort to prosecute and deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia and Trump’s bid to remove Powell’s colleague, Fed governor Lisa Cook. Schiff has worked to preempt potential mortgage fraud charges by framing them as a product of Trump’s years-long vendetta against him."
    The article details other examples where trump has shot his desired prosecutions in the foot.
  • Despite Trump’s Claims, Grocery Prices Are Rising
    Following are edited excerpts from a current report in The New York Times:
    Weather, supply, tariffs, labor and changing consumer habits continue to drive up the cost of groceries. President Trump falsely claims prices are falling.
    Days away from the first anniversary of President Trump’s second term in office, grocery prices are still rising, undercutting his administration’s rhetoric about how it is making life more affordable for average Americans. The price of beef has risen 16.4 percent over the last year. The price of coffee is up a whopping 19.8 percent. The price of lettuce is up 7.3 percent and frozen fish 8.6 percent.
    Yet Mr. Trump continues to falsely claim otherwise. “Grocery prices are starting to go rapidly down,” he said Tuesday afternoon during a speech in Detroit. It’s not the first time that he has said food prices are down, even when data show they’re not.
    There is no single reason that food is growing more expensive, and not all food products are pricier. The price of eggs — long a campaign topic — had dropped sharply over the past year. Some of the things that factor into price — fertilizer, machinery, labor and fuel costs, weather, where food is grown and what customers want — are difficult to control. Some of Mr. Trump’s actions, like tariffs and immigration crackdowns, have contributed to higher, rather than lower, costs. Low-income families are suffering the most, while middle-class shoppers are starting to take a hit.
    Data released Tuesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics found the cost of food at home rose 2.4 percent overall in the previous 12 months and 0.7 percent in December alone, the fastest single-month increase since October 2022. That month-over-month gain stood out in an otherwise subdued inflation report.
    Professor Volpe, of the agribusiness department at Cal Poly, formerly worked at the Department of Agriculture and said: “This does hammer home the point that when the current administration claims that grocery prices are down, that is, of course, not correct.”
    Higher prices are particularly affecting low-income consumers, some of whom temporarily lost their SNAP benefits during last year’s government shutdown. Those consumers are prioritizing essentials, trading down to cheaper products, buying less and making more frequent trips to the store instead of stocking up, according to grocery executives.
    “Instead of buying steak, they’re buying ground beef and so forth,” Susan Morris, the chief executive of Albertsons, said on an earnings call last week. Ronald Sargent, the interim chief executive of Kroger, said last month that consumers were turning to promotions and store brands to save money. And both executives said they were beginning to see similar behavior from middle-income consumers.
    Not everything is going up; some foods have declined in price. Eggs are 20.9 percent cheaper than a year ago, and the cost of most dairy products has declined modestly. But overall, prices are up in five of the six major food-at-home categories tracked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Trump administration’s ever-changing tariff policies have directly affected only a small number of food items in the grocery store, because much of what is consumed in the United States is grown here. But there are some products — like coffee and tropical fruits and vegetables — that are primarily grown abroad and imported into the United States. Many of their prices have climbed on the heels of increased tariffs.
    The cost of bananas, for instance, was up 5.9 percent in December from year-earlier levels. Consumers are most concerned about price increases in categories like beef, coffee and chocolate, Mr. Sargent said on a conference call last month. But tariffs are not only affecting the cost of food; they have driven up the cost of farming inputs, which are eventually reflected in price, as well as food packaging. Higher prices for canned and frozen foods, sodas and other drinks most likely reflect higher costs for aluminum and other packaging materials.
    Coffee drinkers are likely to see some relief in the coming months; in November, Mr. Trump removed the 40 percent tariffs on imports from Brazil, a major coffee exporter. But beef eaters likely aren’t, as high prices are mostly linked to a half-decade-long drop in the supply of cattle, which will take as long to reverse. In December, ground beef hit a record $6.69 a pound, up from $5.61 a year earlier. Both coffee and beef were rising in price before Mr. Trump took office, highlighting why some consumers may feel that food costs have risen more than the 2.4 percent that the data say they have risen: It’s coming on top of years of elevated prices. Grocery store prices are nearly 26 percent higher than they were five years ago, according to the labor bureau.
    “The headline number, the 2.4 percent increase, in food is not that encouraging, and it’s building on already higher numbers,” said Michael Swanson, the chief agricultural economist at Wells Fargo Agri-Food Institute. “That is what people really find a challenge.” The Agriculture Department expects food-at-home prices to rise 2.3 percent in 2026, about the same as they increased in 2025.
    Anecdotally, the White House’s immigration crackdown has also played a role in driving up food costs. A lack of workers in some areas has led to cherries rotting in Oregon fields, blueberries rotting in New Jersey fields and Pennsylvania dairy farmers selling off cows. But the cost of other fresh fruits, which include berries, has fallen 1.2 percent over the last year, and the price of milk is down 1 percent.
    Fruit farms and dairies are especially reliant on immigrant labor. Given that those prices have fallen, it isn’t clear if the immigration crackdown hasn’t yet affected them or if perhaps prices would have decreased more if labor was more readily available. Agriculture groups have warned that they are struggling to find workers, and in November, the Trump administration responded by making it easier for farmers to hire foreign workers.
    “Labor is clearly the biggest cost driver and makes up about 50 percent of our industry’s expenses,” said Cathy Burns, the chief executive of the International Fresh Produce Association. She said that limits placed on immigration had made it more difficult for farmers to find workers, and that labor costs in agriculture had been rising for a decade. John David Rainey, the chief financial officer at Walmart, the country’s largest grocer, said at a conference last month that he expected “peak impact from the tariff cost to land around the beginning of the first quarter” before subsiding.
    But even if that is true, labor challenges remain, extreme weather could always wreck a crop and the costs of farm inputs like fertilizer, seeds and equipment could continue to rise.

    Comment:   "Yet Mr. Trump continues to falsely claim otherwise." That all-purpose statement can be accurately used for 99.995% of anything that comes out of the Trumpet's mouth.
  • Judge Strikes Down Trump’s Latest Effort to Stop Offshore Wind
    "Offshore wind energy has been widely used in the North Sea to power many homes."
    And, for many years.