Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • This Investing Trend Is Your Friend—Until It Isn’t
    ""Momentum makes less sense to a thoughtful, long-term investor."
    MMM...this investor has been using momo successfully since 2000 because it works if you know how to do that, and it's not that easy.
    The other choice is to have some diversification LT with minimal trades, which is pretty good for most.
    Something that is not easy doesn't mean it's undoable. You must have a system that works and keep tweaking it. It doesn't mean it's perfect; just better is enough to get better results.
    If I had stocks, I would have a higher % in Value, Europe, China, and gold.
    If momo doesn't work, how come US LC were great during 1995-2000 + 2010-2024 while Value, SC, and international were better during 2000-10. Each one lasted for years.
    Generally, when US LC do well, it's difficult to beat them per risk-adjusted performance. When they are not, it takes more effort to find other categories and I would advise being more diversified.
    Investors who don't believe it, don't practice it, and don't trade it can't be good traders.
  • Liberation Day! What’s the play?
    Agree.
    Third world countries have a better experiential knowledge of stagflation. US had only two (non-consecutive) years in the 70s of stagflation. So, media talking about it more now is more out of fascination (not sure that is the right word but you get the idea).
    Now that I had a chance to read the thread, I agree with the general sentiment - the world in turmoil. I get that evidence pointed to it before hand (i.e., not news) but that does not make it easy for people to stomach it or deal with it when the event arrives. The good news is humans are wired for optimism (which is also the cause for their undoing sometimes!).
    @stillers, Disturbance, Detox, etc. are only some of the words used. Also, just knowing their priorities, an immediate vibrant economy is not a goal or a priority. Looking at human history with similar priorities also tells me the economy has to take a hit, which is why I gave this the highest probability. To keep this thread clean, I will stop here.
  • Liberation Day! What’s the play?
    FWIW, all SELLs (per above posts) have been entered today.
    Reduced stock exposure by ~50%.
    Parking proceeds in VMRXX, FZDXX and will likely BUY a coupla new rungs on 5-yr CDs ladder that virtually guarantees a net positive TR in 2025.
    Kudos to @larryB for this thread.
    (Sadly) Timely and actionable.
    EDIT: NOT saying this strategy is correct for anyone other than me and the missus.
    BUT, our #1 goal this year, after two monster stock gain years under a REAL president, was to NOT allow the buffoon's asinine fiscal policies (read, orange brain farts) to cause us to be anything but net positive for the year on 12/31/25. And that goal has virtually been guaranteed with these moves today. Plus, we will sleep MUCH better thru year-end!
  • How Tariffs Could Shock America’s Power System
    The river, in my childhood, was essentially dead.
    Don't forget:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuyahoga_River

    Western New England: the shad run up the Connecticut River was non-existent for years and years. There had been a GE plant in Pittsfield. I think it's closed. Dunno just what they did there. Tariffs sucks, anyhow.
  • How Tariffs Could Shock America’s Power System
    Some of you may recall my unease over the years at the fact that we no longer manufacture many types of electrical transformers that are absolutely critical to any large grid system. Many of those transformers are special-order items currently made only in China, and that have lengthy time-frames to design and manufacture.
    Following are excerpts from a recent Wall Street Journal report, which goes into some detail on this issue:
    Transformers used in power grids are especially vulnerable to trade disruptions
    America’s power grid is due for some big investments. Tariffs could now make that much costlier.
    As surging power demand from places such as data centers is set to strain the system, transformers, the nuts and bolts of the power system, look particularly vulnerable. These are devices that step up or down voltages as electricity moves from power plants to homes and factories. New ones are also required every time a new source of electricity—whether wind, solar or natural gas—connects to the grid. The lack of these components can therefore hold up more power from being brought online.
    The power industry has already been experiencing a shortage of transformers, for which demand is expected to jump even more in the coming years. Suppliers have been reluctant to invest large sums of capital to expand production capacity because such investments have long break-even timelines. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimates that about 55% of in-service distribution transformer units are older than 33 years and approaching their end of life.
    So far, the Trump administration has imposed 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as a 10% across-the-board tariff on China. But more could come: The one-month pause on Trump’s proposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico is set to expire in early March. Meanwhile, Trump has ordered federal agencies to explore reciprocal tariffs on trading partners around the world. He has also floated tariffs on copper.
    Transformers could become a chokepoint. Only about 20% of transformer demand can be met by the domestic supply chain, according to Wood Mackenzie, which also estimated that transformer prices have already risen 70% to 100% since January 2020 because of inflation for raw materials such as electrical steel and copper.
    Mexico, Canada and China are important sources of electrical equipment to the U.S. In 2024, China accounted for over 32% of U.S. low-voltage transformer equipment imports and Mexico accounted for 36% of high-voltage transformer imports. Canada accounted for about 16% of U.S. imports of high-voltage switchgear and 100% of imported utility poles. Utilities typically go through a lengthy process to test the reliability of transformers they are purchasing and tend to require custom specifications, so it isn’t an easy process to switch to a new supplier.
    Tariffs will pile new cost pressures on an already-tight grid. The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities said its residential customers’ average monthly bill is expected to increase by 17% to 20% for the 12-month period starting June 2025, partly due to data center-driven demand growth. Nationwide, electricity prices have increased at a compound annual growth rate of 5.7% over the last five years, a considerable acceleration since the preceding five years when prices were roughly flat, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    Also worth watching: If the 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum do result in a reshoring of those energy-intensive industries, that itself would add to long-term power demand.

    Comment: How likely is it that the current administration has the slightest idea of what transformers are or how crucial they are to the United States economy and manufacturing capability?
  • Affordable compact cars could be first to see rising prices from tariffs
    FD1000 said: "This is a political thread that should be posted in the OFF threads."
    “Another wipeout walloped Wall Street Friday,” Stan Choe of the Associated Press wrote today. The S&P 500 had one of its worst days in two years, dropping 2%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 715 points, losing 1.7% of its value. The Nasdaq Composite fell 2.7%. On Tuesday, news dropped that the administration’s blanket firings and wildly shifting tariff policies have dropped consumer confidence to a low it has not hit since January 2021. Today’s stock market tumble started after the Commerce Department released data showing that consumer prices are rising faster than economists expected.
    AIG chief international economist James Knightley said: “We are moving in the wrong direction and the concern is that tariffs threaten higher prices, which means the inflation prints are going to remain hot.” Business leaders like lower interest rates, which reduce borrowing costs and make it cheaper to finance business initiatives, but with rising inflation, the Federal Reserve will be less likely to cut interest rates.

    @FD1000- Right you are! All of this is political and will have absolutely no impact on the financial arena.
    (Note: Above information quoted from Heather Cox Richardson, 3/28/25.)
  • Donald Trump announces new 25% tariffs on all imported cars and car parts
    FD1000 said: "First, this thread is political and should be in OFF forum."
    “Another wipeout walloped Wall Street Friday,” Stan Choe of the Associated Press wrote today. The S&P 500 had one of its worst days in two years, dropping 2%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 715 points, losing 1.7% of its value. The Nasdaq Composite fell 2.7%. On Tuesday, news dropped that the administration’s blanket firings and wildly shifting tariff policies have dropped consumer confidence to a low it has not hit since January 2021. Today’s stock market tumble started after the Commerce Department released data showing that consumer prices are rising faster than economists expected.
    AIG chief international economist James Knightley said: “We are moving in the wrong direction and the concern is that tariffs threaten higher prices, which means the inflation prints are going to remain hot.” Business leaders like lower interest rates, which reduce borrowing costs and make it cheaper to finance business initiatives, but with rising inflation, the Federal Reserve will be less likely to cut interest rates.

    @FD1000- Right you are! All of this is political and will have absolutely no impact on the financial arena.
    (Note: Above information quoted from Heather Cox Richardson, 3/28/25.)
  • Donald Trump announces new 25% tariffs on all imported cars and car parts
    @FDSo, just ignore the coup day by day. 1000- Hey there - you think that any of this might impact your financial situation?
    Edited for civility. OJ, good sir, please don't let your annoyance take over.

    First, this thread is political and should be in OFF forum.
    Second, I didn't sell, and I'm doing well, as I have done for years. My portfolio was at its peak at the close last Friday 3/28/2025. If you know my style and goals, you know what I do. I hope your portfolio is doing great, BTW.
    The best thing, as usual, is to do nothing and stop reading the scary stories. You should design your portfolio based on your goals with limited trades.
    If you are a good trader, watch markets in real time and make adjustments.
    So, just ignore the coup. Nothing to see here. Business as usual... If a coup doesn't vitally impact investing decisions, then nothing does.
  • Donald Trump announces new 25% tariffs on all imported cars and car parts
    @FD1000- Hey there - you think that any of this might impact your financial situation?
    Edited for civility. OJ, good sir, please don't let your annoyance take over.
    First, this thread is political and should be in OFF forum.
    Second, I didn't sell, and I'm doing well, as I have done for years. My portfolio was at its peak at the close last Friday 3/28/2025. If you know my style and goals, you know what I do. I hope your portfolio is doing great, BTW.
    The best thing, as usual, is to do nothing and stop reading the scary stories. You should design your portfolio based on your goals with limited trades.
    If you are a good trader, watch markets in real time and make adjustments.
  • Is US Stock Market Outperformance Sustainable?
    "The US stock market is by far the best one long term."
    I believe US stocks will perform well in the long-term
    and most stock investors should have a healthy allocation to the US.
    This does not necessarily mean the equity portion of their portfolios should be 100% US equities.
    For example, wouldn't it have been beneficial for retirees (presumably withdrawing from portfolios)
    to have foreign stocks in addition to an S&P 500 fund during the "Lost Decade"?
    "So, it boils down to timing and trading."
    No, it really doesn't.
    Numerous studies have indicated excessive trading often leads to lower returns.
    It boils down to creating a sensible investment plan with an asset allocation
    suitable to an investor's risk tolerance/risk capacity,
    and then sticking to the plan (making adjustments as needed based on life changes).
    Some investors may find it helpful to work with a financial advisor to develop this plan.
    Can you find where I said 100% in US stocks?
    Any time you switch funds, it is timing, and, as you noted, most are doing it wrong. If you hold static, your portfolio will suffer for many years. (During 2000-10, for 10 years: SPY lost about 9% and QQQ lost over 40%...During 2010-2024 the SPY+QQQ were great.)
    The solution is good analysis, knowing funds/ETFs very well, and limited/smart timing. A good example is Charles Lynn Bolin's articles.
    A sensible investment plan sounds great; the devil is in the details.
    Same with financial advisor, in theory, it's a good idea. In real life, not so much.
    Problem 1: Catch 22: If your investment knowledge is below average, you will not know if your FA (financial adviser) is good. If your investment knowledge is above average, you will not need one.
    Problem 2: A FA is jack of all trades and a master of none. Anytime you need a real complicated advice, he/she can't answer it. Anything that relates to taxes, you need to see a CPA, anything that relates to trusts, you must see an attorney.
    Problem 3: A FA can't promise you any future performance or even risk-adjusted performance.
    Problem 4: The highest commission vehicles for a FA are annuities or a guarantee of something. These are usually bad for the clients.
    You probably heard a typical FA claim that they are fiduciaries. It is correct that fiduciary is better than not, but it doesn't guarantee much.
    In theory, a FA puts their client interests first. In reality, it doesn't work that well.
    This is how it should work for a typical person in typical situations. You seek a FA advice, a good FA should collect all your information, analyze it, and come up with exactly what to do in about 2-3 hours. They should charge you maybe $1000-1500. You can implement the plan for years to come, unless you have a major change. This means, you don't need the FA for years to come. In the event you have a major change and need advice, one hour of consultation should be enough; maybe another $300 fee.
    Remember, any time your FA wants you to stay with them for years and collect his/her fee as a % of your portfolio, it is a bad choice. You should only pay them by the hour. You can find good fee only FA at www.garrettplanningnetwork.com/
    If a FA followed the above, they would starve. This is why it would be very difficult to find a great, reliable, honest, low-fee FA that puts their client's interests first.
    The best idea is to learn and get better. You spent at least 12 years in school; why can you not spend just 100 hours learning the basics?
    Most people need to handle and manage their money for decades, why not educate yourself? It's not a brain surgery.
  • Is US Stock Market Outperformance Sustainable?
    @FD1000 who asked "What is your record of forecasting, timing, and trading?"
    Good question. What is yours other than your say so?
    First, I don't write articles, get paid, or try to convince you of anything, while this article, among many in the past, has proven wrong.
    Second, if you want to see my record for risk-adjusted performance, you can read about it at my site. See it (here). If you want to see my system, read (here).
    Again, I don't promote it. It is just there if you want to learn something new.
  • WealthTrack Show
    Part 2 with Ed Yardeni:
    Ed Yardeni reflects on the remarkable resilience of the US economy and markets over the years despite what happens in Washington and around the world.
    https://youtu.be/gYLoUWIjISM
  • Donald Trump announces new 25% tariffs on all imported cars and car parts
    3/28- This, thanks to a lead by @Crash. Edited excerpts from a report by CNN:
    Florida debates lifting some child labor laws to fill jobs vacated by undocumented immigrants
    Florida has been working for years to crack down on employers that hire undocumented immigrants. But that presented a problem for businesses in the state that are desperate for workers to fill low-wage and often undesirable jobs.
    Florida’s Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state legislature have a potential solution: children. The state’s legislature on Tuesday advanced a bill that would loosen child labor laws, allowing children as young as 14 years old to work overnight shifts. If the new law is passed, teenagers would be able to work overnight jobs on school days. They are currently prevented from working earlier than 6:30 am or later than 11 pm per state law.
    The bill passed through the Florida Senate’s Commerce and Tourism committee on Tuesday with five votes in favor of the loosened child labor restrictions and four against them. The bill will pass through two other relevant committees before being put to a vote with the full Florida Senate. DeSantis is supportive of the law and has been vocal of cracking down on immigration, echoing President Donald Trump’s rhetoric. However, economists have warned that could backfire, sparking further inflation and labor shortages.
    “Why do we say we need to import foreigners, even import them illegally, when you know, teenagers used to work at these resorts, college students should be able to do this stuff,” DeSantis said last week at a panel discussion with border czar Tom Homan, as first reported by the Tampa Bay Times.
    The state has been easing up on child labor protections for years. Last year, the legislature passed a law allowing home-schooled 16- and 17-year old teens to work any hour of the day.
    The state’s Republican-led legislature on Tuesday will debate the new law, which also includes a number of changes including eliminating working time restrictions on teenagers aged 14 and 15 if they are home-schooled and ending guaranteed meal breaks for 16 and 17 year olds.
    The number of child labor violations in Florida has nearly tripled in recent years, according to US Department of Labor statistics.
    Comment: Does anyone seriously believe that the children of the upper classes will be included in these young workers?
  • Fido’s “basket” option
    Thanks @msf. You obviously know a lot more about it than the 2 Fido reps I spoke with yesterday and today. ;)
    I’ve got a great portfolio tracker. Slices & dices with ease. So the benefits of their basket were minimal (and $4.99 monthly).
    Yes, adding or withdrawing across the board takes more time - but should rarely be necessary.
    PS Re fractional shares. I’ve been trading CEFs at Fido for at least a couple years. Never ever ran into an issue selling dollar amounts (fractional shares). Possibly something has changed? My first impression was that it was some sort of “get even” with me for cancelling their basket option. I’m sure, however, they would not stoop that low. At $60 a year the benefits vs the trouble of DIY are pretty close.
  • Is US Stock Market Outperformance Sustainable?
    I have read similar articles over 10 years. One day it would be true, maybe even this year.
    The US stock market is by far the best one long term.
    So, it boils down to timing and trading.
    So, when someone writes an article like that, my question is
    What is your record of forecasting, timing, and trading?
  • Donald Trump announces new 25% tariffs on all imported cars and car parts
    Throughout history ruling classes have done whatever it takes to create an underclass equivalent to financial slavery, to perform labor that is ruinous to health and long life. It is no coincidence that the Trump administration is intent upon choking off any type of support for low-income Americans, which will eventually force them into the farm fields to replace the workers who are now being deported.
    3/28- This, thanks to a lead by @Crash. Edited excerpts from a report by CNN:
    Florida debates lifting some child labor laws to fill jobs vacated by undocumented immigrants
    Florida has been working for years to crack down on employers that hire undocumented immigrants. But that presented a problem for businesses in the state that are desperate for workers to fill low-wage and often undesirable jobs.
    Florida’s Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state legislature have a potential solution: children. The state’s legislature on Tuesday advanced a bill that would loosen child labor laws, allowing children as young as 14 years old to work overnight shifts. If the new law is passed, teenagers would be able to work overnight jobs on school days. They are currently prevented from working earlier than 6:30 am or later than 11 pm per state law.
    The bill passed through the Florida Senate’s Commerce and Tourism committee on Tuesday with five votes in favor of the loosened child labor restrictions and four against them. The bill will pass through two other relevant committees before being put to a vote with the full Florida Senate. DeSantis is supportive of the law and has been vocal of cracking down on immigration, echoing President Donald Trump’s rhetoric. However, economists have warned that could backfire, sparking further inflation and labor shortages.
    “Why do we say we need to import foreigners, even import them illegally, when you know, teenagers used to work at these resorts, college students should be able to do this stuff,” DeSantis said last week at a panel discussion with border czar Tom Homan, as first reported by the Tampa Bay Times.
    The state has been easing up on child labor protections for years. Last year, the legislature passed a law allowing home-schooled 16- and 17-year old teens to work any hour of the day.
    The state’s Republican-led legislature on Tuesday will debate the new law, which also includes a number of changes including eliminating working time restrictions on teenagers aged 14 and 15 if they are home-schooled and ending guaranteed meal breaks for 16 and 17 year olds.
    The number of child labor violations in Florida has nearly tripled in recent years, according to US Department of Labor statistics.
  • Is US Stock Market Outperformance Sustainable?
    "The narrative of the past 17 years has been the outperformance of US stocks, with the main explanation
    being US exceptionalism. Our analysis reveals that a statistically insignificant portion of this outperformance
    stemmed from superior earnings growth, with the lion’s share driven by expanding US valuations
    and a strengthening dollar — raising concerns about its sustainability.
    History teaches us that such trends are rarely permanent, with economic regimes and relative valuations
    prone to reversion."

    https://www.morningstar.com/markets/how-sustainable-is-us-exceptionalism
  • Removal of Reliable Economic Data
    Would it be possible that by removing advisory boards it might be easier to cook (even maybe overcook) the government books?
    You mean like redefining words to mean what the government wants them to mean (thank you Humpty Dumpty)?
    Reuters: US Commerce Secretary wants to remove government spending from GDP
    ECONOMISTS ARE WARY
    Economists cautioned against changes to the current national accounts structure as it would make GDP very volatile and difficult to get a clear view of the economy's health, creating more uncertainty.
    "I don't think the stock market, the financial markets would like that," said Sung Won Sohn, Finance and Economics professor at Loyola Marymount University.
    It would also be impossible to compare the U.S. economy's performance against its global peers.
    Looking at the private sector alone would not give the full picture on growth, Sohn said.
    "Economic growth over time would become a lot more volatile. The reason is, when the economy slows or, when we are in a recession, for example, the government spends a lot of money," he said.
    Removing government spending from GDP would distort the figure as government productivity is assumed to be zero whatever the production is in the computation of GDP.
    "It's imperative that we keep the current system because, we need to make comparisons, and it's important to know how well we are doing compared to a year ago, five years ago, 10 years ago, and we can learn from our mistakes," Sohn said.
  • CDs and Money Markets
    I got out of all my muni funds a couple of years ago. In my tax bracket, they just don’t make sense anymore. Even with taxes, most taxable bond funds have higher equivalent yields than comparable muni funds.
  • Donald Trump announces new 25% tariffs on all imported cars and car parts
    I’m glad I don’t need to buy a new car any time soon. Hopefully mine will last at least four more years. Cars are already the most expensive thing people buy, other than homes. This is going to make it impossible for many people to buy a new car.