Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Walmart and Other Retailers Have Eaten the Cost of Tariffs. Now It Is the Consumer’s Turn.
    Just dropped into a Walmart, 3-lb Folgers $22, Simply Orange Juice which used to be about $3.50 for 64oz is now $5 for 46oz. There's some shrinkflation for ya.
  • Longleaf International Fund being reorganized
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/806636/000158064225005413/longleaf497.htm
    Here is the filing:
    497 1 longleaf497.htm 497
    Longleaf Partners International Fund
    Longleaf PartnerGlobal Fund
    (each a series of Longleaf Partners Funds Trust)
    Supplement dated August 25, 2025
    to the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated May 1, 2025
    ______________________________________________________________________
    On August 20, 2025, the Board of Trustees of Longleaf Partners Funds Trust (the “Trust”) approved a proposed Agreement and Plan of Reorganization on behalf of the Longleaf Partners International Fund (the “Acquired Fund”) and the Longleaf Partners Global Fund (the “Acquiring Fund” and together with the Acquired Fund, the “Funds”). Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, the Acquired Fund would transfer its assets and liabilities to the Acquiring Fund in exchange for shares of the Acquiring Fund. The Board determined that the reorganization of the Acquired Fund into the Acquiring Fund is in the best interests of each Fund.
    Under the proposed reorganization, which is subject to approval by the Acquired Fund’s shareholders, the Acquired Fund’s shareholders would receive shares of the Acquiring Fund with the same aggregate net asset value as their shares of the Acquired Fund. It is anticipated that the reorganization will qualify as a tax-free event, which should result in no recognition of a gain or loss for Federal income tax purposes by Acquired Fund shareholders as a result of receiving shares of the Acquiring Fund in connection with the reorganization.
    The Acquired Fund and the Acquiring Fund have the same investment objective and fundamental restrictions. Both Funds invest in equity securities of companies believed to be significantly undervalued, although the Acquiring Fund can invest a larger percentage of its assets in U.S. companies than the Acquired Fund. In connection with the reorganization, the Board has approved the reduction of the Acquiring Fund’s advisory fee to 1.00% of average daily net assets on the first $400 million and 0.75% on net assets above $400 million. The Board has also approved a reduction in the Acquiring Fund’s expense cap to 0.95% (through May 1, 2027). Such fee and expense cap changes will take effect only if shareholders approve the reorganization.
    Information describing the reorganization and soliciting the vote of Acquired Fund shareholders on the reorganization is expected to be mailed in or before October 2025. If the reorganization is approved by shareholders, the reorganization is expected to occur in or before December 2025. The materials will describe the expected date of the reorganization with more specificity. As of the close of business on August 25, 2025, the Acquired Fund will close to new investors. Existing shareholders of the Acquired Fund as of such date may continue to purchase shares of, or exchange into, the Acquired Fund.
    In advance of the reorganization, the Acquired Fund has already sold and could continue to sell certain portfolio securities to align the Acquired Fund’s portfolio with that of the Acquiring Fund. The Acquired Fund will invest the proceeds of such sales in cash and cash equivalents and securities that align with the Acquiring Fund until the reorganization occurs. As a result, to the extent invested in cash, the Acquired Fund may not pursue its investment objective and strategies during this period.
    ______________________________________________________________________
    This Supplement and the existing Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated May 1, 2025, provide relevant information for all shareholders and should be retained for future reference. Both the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information dated May 1, 2025 have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference and can be obtained without charge by calling the Funds at 1-800-445-9469.
  • Longleaf International Fund being reorganized
    From an email ("August 2025 update") I received this morning:
    For 50 years, Southeastern Asset Management (SAM) has been a disciplined value investor through multiple market environments. We remain confident in our belief that bottom-up stock selection is the best approach to preserving capital and generating returns. Three years ago, SAM started making process improvements based on lessons we have learned over the years. As we wrote then, we had been better stock pickers than portfolio and risk managers before these changes started taking hold. Our goal has been to get back to the strong results we delivered for most of our history. We have seen meaningful signs that we are heading in the right direction on multiple fronts. Today, we are announcing additional changes:
    1. We are merging the Longleaf International Fund into the Longleaf Global Fund. The go-forward Global Fund will be run in-line with our current Global approach, allowing us to focus more on our best ideas. We have seen solid returns in the Global Fund since our initial round of changes in late 2022, and we will now own more of this strategy ourselves. As part of this tax-free merger, Global Fund fees will be reduced and capped at a level commensurate with the Small-Cap Fund (95 basis points). We will be sending additional materials on this transaction to our International and Global Fund shareholders in the coming days and weeks. If approved by shareholders, the merger will be finalized December 2025 at the latest.1 Please see the August 25, 2025 Prospectus Supplement for additional information (https://regdocs.blugiant.com/longleaf/).
    2. We are closing our Concentrated Europe strategy and investing our internal funds from it into our go-forward Longleaf Funds. As we like to see at our individual investee companies, this is a meaningful insider purchase of our go-forward strategies and an increase in our focus. Our Asia Pacific strategy will continue to operate under Ken Siazon.
    3. With these changes, John Woodman and Alicia Scarratt will be departing SAM at the end of September. We thank them for their time with us. Our continuing researchers have come up the curve in productivity and non-US coverage. Manish Sharma has been our best researcher outside of the US and will be gaining increased responsibility in the newly created position of Head of Non-US Research. Julio Utrera will be taking on an expanded role covering stocks in Europe, where he has done a great job for us. Separately, Peter Montgomery has recently rejoined our client service and development team to help us grow at the right times when we have qualifying investments. He was with us in the early 2010s, so he is familiar with our value approach as well as with SAM’s internal workings.
    Our go-forward research team has made strong stock picks for the last 10+ years, with mid-teens-plus annualized results at a statistically significant level. We are glad to discuss this with you at a level of detail that would not fit within this note. This data lines up with our returns from our first 30 years. We have been encouraged as well with our improvements in portfolio building. While there have not been many market tests in recent times, Longleaf Partners, Small-Cap and Global Funds materially outperformed during the volatile mid-February through April period earlier this year.
    “I’m excited about where SAM is heading. After delivering excess returns for the first three-plus decades of our 50-year history, we lagged our own goals and many of yours in some of the subsequent years. In recent years, Ross has taken definitive steps to improve our investing and our focus. We have an exceptionally talented analytical team. Under Ross’s portfolio management and research leadership, I’m most confident we will produce outstanding results,” said Mason Hawkins, Founder and Chairman of SAM.
    “Our Business, People, Price approach to investing works over the long term because it’s rational, as the underlying numbers show. We will stay true to SAM’s Governing Principles while continuing to improve as we grow,” said Ross Glotzbach, CEO and Head of Research at SAM.
    We thank you for your partnership and are looking forward to our next 50 years.
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    Merrill is okay for a one-off purchase and I've considered it, but there's a TF on both buys and sells. Also, Merrill doesn't sell DODEX or DODLX, at least in DIY accounts.
    Some alternatives:
    Buy D&C at Merrill and do a partial account ACAT transfer (free) to Fidelity or Schwab. Then one can buy more for $10 or $5 respectively and sell for free.
    Try to cut a deal with Chuck as some HNWIs have done to get D&C fee-waived.
    Use E*Trade where all seven D&C funds (DOD_X) can be traded with no transaction fee.
  • Walmart and Other Retailers Have Eaten the Cost of Tariffs. Now It Is the Consumer’s Turn.
    Sneakflation is here and guess who is paying them?
    Through June, US consumers had absorbed 22% of tariff costs, but that share was expected to rise to 67% by October, according to an August 10 estimation from Goldman Sachs economists. That assessment led to a demand from Trump that the investment giant fire its chief economist.
    Goldman Sachs economists said they expect that about 70% of the direct costs of the tariffs will eventually fall on the consumer, and that the total could rise to 100% if including the spillover effects of domestic producers raising their prices (something that has already occurred and is expected to continue — more on that below).
    https://cnn.com/2025/08/24/economy/us-tariffs-passthrough-consumers
    Powell may cut rate in September, but that may be the only one for the year.
    @Old_Joe, yes, hamburg price will continue to rise. Consumers will face the full tariffs effect in October.
  • You're buying stocks where? But Europe Is Losing ...
    Buying European stocks is about diversifying the portfolio risk from the over-valued US stocks. Will AI propels the market in the future? No one knows for sure, but AI stocks are trading at high multiples. European market is still growing but at a slower rate comparing to US, and the valuation is more reasonable.
    Several points to consider:
    1. In light of the current political climate, Europe is increasing their GDPs on defense and armament.
    2. Since the Ukraine war, Norway Finland and Sweden have joined NATO. Switzerland is moving away from neutrality.
    3.. Europe is forming stronger alliance and trading partners with other countries instead depending on US. And that is significant since WWII.
    4. US dollar has decline over 10% against the major currency since December last year. Developed and emerging markets have moved up against S&P 500, for example.
    5. The dollar will likely to remain as the main trading currency. With the mounting deficit in trillions, when will the trading partners want to get paid in their local currencies?
    As i mentioned previously on this board, we came to respect Andrew Foster (and his team) of the Seafarer funds. Great investors who able to deliver consistent returns in emerging market.
  • You're buying stocks where? But Europe Is Losing ...
    There have been many discussions here lately on the preference for European over U.S. stocks. At 86, I'm strictly in MMkt, CD, and Treasury income, so have no horse in this race. But seeing this report in The Wall Street Journal made me sit up and take notice. The WSJ link should be free, and perhaps it will be of interest to some here at MFO.
    Today Europe, particularly Western Europe, finds itself adrift, an aging continent slowly losing economic, military and diplomatic clout.
    • The continent’s economies have been largely stagnant for about 15 years, likely the longest such streak since the Industrial Revolution, according to calculations by Deutsche Bank. Germany’s economy is 1% bigger than it was at the end of 2017, while the U.S. economy has grown 19%.
    • Europe’s share of global economic output, measured in current dollars, fell from roughly 33% to 23% between 2005 and 2024, according to World Bank data.
    • The long stretch of weak European growth has opened up a big gap in incomes between the U.S. and Europe. European household wealth has grown by a third as much as Americans’ since 2009. Per capita GDP in the U.S. is now $86,000 a year, versus $56,000 for Germany and $53,000 for the U.K.
    • In the absence of economic growth, Europe’s welfare states, which account for half the planet’s welfare spending, will come under growing strain from aging populations. The average European is nearly 45 years old, compared with 39 for the average American, and the continent’s working-age population is predicted to fall by nearly 50 million by 2050, leaving fewer workers to pay for more retirees.
    “Europe needs to wake up, or it’s dead in so many ways,” says Tracy Blackwell, the retiring CEO of Pension Insurance Corporation, a U.K. asset manager.
    Or as JP Morgan chief Jamie Dimon said at a recent speech in Dublin, “You’re losing.”
    Said British historian Niall Ferguson in March: “What was the status quo? The Americans provide our security, the Russians provide our energy, and the Chinese provide our export market. Guess what? It’s all gone,”
    As Italy’s prime minister Giorgia Meloni puts it, “America innovates, China imitates, Europe regulates.”
    Bad luck and bad policy
    In the past 15 years, a key engine of European growth—manufactured exports—has been hobbled by events beyond its control, including U.S.-led trade wars, China’s mercantilist policies and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which sent European energy prices skyrocketing.
    • In Germany, industrial electricity costs three times as much as in the U.S.; in the U.K., four times as much.
    • Ten years ago, four European companies ranked in the global top 10 by revenues. Today, the continent’s biggest company by market value, German software firm SAP, ranks 28th.
    • America’s share of global stock market valuations has held steady at 48% since 2000, but the EU’s has fallen from 18% to 10%, and the U.K.’s from 8.3% to 2.6%, according to Deutsche Bank.
    Europe’s economic slide has been accompanied by shriveling military prowess. Though European leaders are now vowing to take defense more seriously in the face of a revanchist Russia, they are struggling to build up their forces. Britain’s entire army can fit comfortably inside Wembley Stadium.
    Mario Draghi, a former top European central banker, proposed a series of steps in a landmark EU report last year. But the proposals immediately ran into resistance. “You say no to public debt, you say no to the single market, you say no to creating the capital market union. You can’t say no to everything,” a clearly frustrated Draghi said in a speech to European lawmakers in February. “So when you ask me, ‘What is best to do now?’ I say, ‘I have no idea. But do something!’”

    Without more economic growth, European governments will have to choose between ever-higher taxes and massive cuts to welfare. That is because an aging population means much higher healthcare and pension costs, paid for by a working-age population projected to shrink by some 2 million a year on average through 2050, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels.
    Meanwhile, the current strategy of financing welfare spending with taxes and debt is running out of road. Tax revenue as a share of economic output is already around 38% in Germany, 43% in Italy and 44% in France, compared with 25% in the U.S., according to OECD data. The U.K.’s annual debt interest bill stands at nearly $150 billion, twice as much as defense. Borrowing costs have already risen in the U.K. as debt approaches 100% of yearly economic output.
    There are exceptions. Sweden has quietly spurred economic growth by cutting back its welfare state—tightening government spending, revamping the pension system and slashing corporate and personal tax rates. Per capita incomes are now climbing, and the country has seen a burst of entrepreneurship.
    But in most of Europe, such reforms are proving to be a big ask. Europeans consistently vote for politicians who protect the status quo and expand the welfare state. In France, which hasn’t balanced its national budget in more than 50 years, government spending is around 57% of GDP, compared with 36% for the U.S.
    Appeared in the August 23, 2025, print edition as 'Europe Is Losing Can Europe Reverse Its Long Slide?'.
    Notes: The above edited excerpts are a severely abridged version of the actual Wall Street Journal report. Some text emphasis was added to various quotes.
  • IF RED STATE SOLDIERS OCCUPY BLUE STATES
    I respectfully submit that which national guards (or regular army) occupy areas is irrelevant.
    As to the economic impact on the only state occupied so far (California), by federalized units of the California national guard, here's what the government of California had to say:
    the number of people reporting to work in the private sector in California decreased by 3.1% — a downturn only recently matched by the period when people stayed home from work during the COVID-19 lockdown.
    ... a ripple effect – the state’s economy is likely to contract later this year due to fallout from global tariffs and immigration raids in Los Angeles and other cities that have rattled key sectors, including construction, hospitality, and agriculture, according to a UCLA Anderson forecast.
    Mass arrests, detentions and deportations in California could slash $275 billion from the state’s economy and eliminate $23 billion in annual tax revenue. The loss of immigrant workers, undocumented and those losing lawful status under the Trump administration, would delay projects (including rebuilding Los Angeles after the wildfires), reduce food supply, and drive up costs. Undocumented immigrants contributed $8.5 billion in state and local taxes in 2022 — a number that would rise to $10.3 billion if these taxpayers could apply to work lawfully.
    https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/07/31/nearly-all-national-guard-soldiers-in-los-angeles-are-demobilizing-governor-newsom-demands-those-remaining-be-released/
    The links embedded in that piece are worth following, for their greater depth, their figures on how other states could be affected, and their multiple additional citations.
    Here is the link for the UCLA Anderson report. While it focuses more on tariffs than on labor disruptions, it does note that deportations are playing into construction labor shortages. This in turn means lower construction projections and that "the prospect of the private sector building out of the housing affordability problem over the next three years is nil."
    https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/ucla-anderson-forecast-u-s-california-economies-slow-amid-persistent-economic-geopolitical-uncertainties
    P.S. Regarding rebuilding LA after the fires, the NYTimes Magazine has a piece I'm just reading now about the environmental and environmental justice issues in disposing of the waste from the fires. "That is more than the entire city of Philadelphia produces in a year [without] even account[ing] for all the charred vehicles and trees. " Maybe the national guard from those other states could lend a hand?
    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/24/magazine/landfill-calabasas-los-angeles-wildfire-ash.html
  • IF RED STATE SOLDIERS OCCUPY BLUE STATES
    I think Johnson federalized and used the national guard on a state by state basis. I don't think there is a precedence for using the guard across state borders. The discussion below points out how a president, using his/her control over the DC law enforcement and guard along with loop holes the current President has found in the Posse Comitatus Act, to violate the intent of the law. I think it is agreed that this intent was that a President needed a state's consent. But, if a blue state refused federalization and a red state allowed federalization, the current position seems to be that the federalized red state national guard and federal military could be used in a blue state. (I guess as long as SCOTUS approves the declared reason for doing so.)
    The Posse Comitatus Act Explained (updated in June 2025)
  • Walmart and Other Retailers Have Eaten the Cost of Tariffs. Now It Is the Consumer’s Turn.
    From a number of sources I've read that the beef imported from Brazil is mostly "front end" cuts primarily used for ground meat here in the U.S. So this gets a little complicated... Bolsonaro is in trouble because he tried to imitate Trump, so Trump is charging the U.S. citizens 50% more for their hamburger meat.
    Now you folks know that I didn't do college or university, so I don't have the financial education necessary to work through that. Can any of you better-educated folks help on this one?
  • You May Already Have Crypto in your Mutual Fund
    Coincidentally, I read the following this morning: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/corporate-america-bitcoin-strategy-hyper-113002765.html
    To understand the risk, imagine if Fortune 500 companies in the 1990s had plowed billions of dollars into Beanie Babies as their primary reserve asset.
  • You May Already Have Crypto in your Mutual Fund
    From the linked article:
    More than 100 publicly traded companies now have some crypto assets on their balance sheets. None owns more than Strategy MSTR (formerly known as MicroStrategy), a pioneer of this trend. The firm first started investing in bitcoin in August 2020 and now owns more than 600,000 bitcoins, or roughly $70 billion at current prices. That’s more than 60% of the firm’s market cap, so the stock’s fortunes rely almost entirely on bitcoin. The stock moved almost lockstep with bitcoin until 2024, when Strategy’s growth skyrocketed and began trading at a substantial premium.
    Is-cryptocurrency-already-hiding-your-retirement-account?
  • Walmart and Other Retailers Have Eaten the Cost of Tariffs. Now It Is the Consumer’s Turn.
    @JD_co observed that ground beef prices are shooting up (our "high end" store just raised its price 10%) and suggested we might have to resort to tofu on the barbie. That would certainly help out the soybean farmers.
    [Our dinner plan for tonight is mapo tofu. Simple seasonings, truly a comfort food.]
    @Sven suggested that we might have to resort to sawdust filler. My thoughts turned to Hamburger Helper, which was created during a period of rising inflation that started with LBJ's guns and butter budgets. (Inflation subsequently accelerated under Nixon, Ford, and Carter).
    https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual/insights/guns-and-butter
    It turns out that HH uses wheat, not soy, as its main ingredient. Since the US is a net exporter of wheat ($5.97B out, $0.77B in), at first glance this would help avoid tariffs. However, as @Mark points out, much pasta is imported. Likewise the US is a net importer of wheat flour ($151M out, $309M in).
    https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/wheat/reporter/usa (OEC, wheat trade)
    https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/wheat-flours/reporter/usa (OEC, wheat flour trade)
    Talk about eating the tariffs!
  • Walmart and Other Retailers Have Eaten the Cost of Tariffs. Now It Is the Consumer’s Turn.
    Canada and Mexico are major food importers to US. Now the tariffs is making things more expensive. Below is a 2024 USDA report on food.
    https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/DataFiles/53736/FoodImports.xlsx?v=66673
    Read earlier that some soybean farmers are having difficulty exporting their soybean. China was their main customers, but no more. China is buying soybean from Brazil as they are funding Brazil’s agriculture development through the massive Belts and Roads Initiative.
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    It would be a good idea to examine drawdown periods as @Obervant1 noted with various multi-sector funds and ETFs for their risk. Using MFO Premium, one can compare these funds for their MFO rating and Risk over 3 years and 5 years period. In general, MS funds carry higher risk than that of investment grade bonds. I have short term investment bonds to compliment my MS and high yield bonds.
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    Fidelity sells 111 distinct Vanguard funds. 115 share classes in all, as it offers two share classes of four funds: {VCPAX / VCPIX}, {VZICX / VWICX}, {VMNIX ($5M min) / VMNFX}, {VPMAX / VPMCX}
    Vanguard funds at Fidelity
    In its fund screener (see link above), there's an option to select the fund family. D&C is missing from the screener's list of families available.
    This is the first time I noticed that Fidelity is selling Admiral shares of a few (non-index) Vanguard funds. Curiously it puts a $2500 min on VPMAX (Admiral) which is below the $3000 minimum it, and Vanguard, put on Investor class shares like VPMCX. Schwab also sells VPMAX but with its customary $50K min.
    For someone in the decumulation phase, a onetime fee of $74.95 (Schwab) or $100 (Fidelity) isn't major impediment. Buy it once, sell at no cost, and rebalance periodically with a $10 (Schwab) or $5 (Fidelity) fee via automatic investing.
  • Walmart and Other Retailers Have Eaten the Cost of Tariffs. Now It Is the Consumer’s Turn.
    As Sven notes, labor shortages are very much a factor. A couple of day ago I read a report on Florida agriculture's problems due to labor shortages. One long-time strawberry farmer, (who had voted for Trump but was now afraid to have his name used because of his fear of retaliation from the MAGA regime), related that he had reduced his planting to 35% of normal because many of his laborers were afraid to show up for work. He said that even though he paid well above the minimum wage he still could not obtain the labor that had been available previously.
    OK, that's 65% of strawberries from one Florida supplier that are no longer available for the the market. Anyone think that that might cause prices to rise?
  • M* US MultiSector Bond Category
    Risk is a very important consideration in my opinion.
    I recall when IOFIX and SEMMX were touted as being "cash subs."
    Both of these funds subsequently generated significant losses during Q1 2020.
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/comment/150158/#Comment_150158
  • “The one-fund Portfolio as a default suggestion”
    There is a $100 transaction fee to purchase D&C funds via Fidelity.
    Schwab charges a corresponding fee of $74.95.
    The transaction fee is high because D&C (along with Vanguard) refuses to pay for fund supermarket placement.