Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • On Bubble Watch - latest memo from Howard Marks
    I thought David Giroux is the gold standard and now that it is revealed he has a SPY target of 5,300 for end of 2025, we move on to someone else who will vouch for what we want.
    Too many posters in this forum have become propagandists / activists and as with all those in that elk they never change their opinion / ways, evidence or context be damned, rather they are in constant pursuit of confirmation of information to suit their propaganda.
    In terms of their impact, these posters are no different from those that bang my front door hard (not withstanding there is a calling bell switch right next to the door handle) to tell me their version of God (and Jesus). Last night, an 18 yr old kid did that and I asked him why it was necessary to be so impolite and inconvenience others to bang the door? He said with a straight face that he was trying to get our attention to God and Jesus. No sorry or remorse. People have lost their minds so much they no longer see or hear others as human beings. Last night, that kid reminded me of some posters in this forum.
  • On Bubble Watch - latest memo from Howard Marks
    The S&P 500 may experience a bear market or it may gain more than 25% for the third consecutive year.
    No one, including Howard Marks or Tom Bowley, knows the actual outcome.
    Bowley appears to be a short-term momentum trader.
    How is Bowley's commentary relevant for typical long-term stock investors?
  • Inflation watch- Your Coffee just went up (then down) by 50%
    "On Sunday, Trump retaliated by announcing tariffs of 25 percent immediately, rising to 50 percent in a week, on all Colombian goods coming into the United States"
    From a current report in The Washington Post
  • "Experts" Forecast Stock and Bond Returns: 2025 Edition
    Thank you @WABAC for sharing. 75 to 42% is huge. Good for you.
    My equity allocation has not changed by my own deliberate actions but managers have reduced equities or increased allocation to cash. E.g., PRWCX is down to 55% equity (per David Giroux) and MRFOX is carrying nearly 30% cash. (As an aside, MRFOX probably should be classified has a tactical allocation fund.)
  • On Bubble Watch - latest memo from Howard Marks
    Latest from Bowly (stockcharts.com/articles/tradingplaces/2025/01/whats-the-secret-to-crushing-t-702.html).
    Quote
    "Don't bet against a secular bull market advance!" We're all trained, or brainwashed, if you will, to believe that the next major stock market top is at hand or just around the corner. It completely immobilizes us when it comes to having belief in the major advance at hand. Give us a bit of selling and we'll quickly point out the likely recession and swift stock market drop ahead. Two weeks ago, reigniting inflation was a major concern and the S&P 500 was 5% off its high. Today, we're in all-time high territory after the ACTUAL inflation data said that inflation is NOT a problem. Or we can just be blindfolded and keep tuning into the circus that is CNBC.
    Drown out the noise and all the bearish rhetoric, and instead focus on one of my favorite charts. This is a 100-year monthly chart of the S&P 500:....
    The next time you think, "is this the start of the next secular bear market?", I want you to remember one thing. There have been TWO starts to secular bear markets in my entire lifetime - the early 1970s and the turn of the century as the dot com bubble popped. That's it. Just stop trying to call the 3rd one. There have only been 14 cyclical bear markets since 1950, which means that, on average, we see only one of these lesser bear markets every 5-6 years. Since 2018, we've had 3 of them (2018, 2020, 2022). That's waaaaay more than our fair share. Let the bulls do their thing.
    If you look back above to the 100-year chart, you'll see that the S&P 500's monthly PPO is accelerating to the upside, telling us that long-term bullish momentum just keeps building. Bear markets don't begin until that monthly PPO moves into negative territory.
    Let's play a game. The only way I declare Marks a winner is if 2 things happen in 2025. The SP500 must lose more than 20% + it's down for the year.
    If we are in a bubble, it should be an easy test.
  • "Experts" Forecast Stock and Bond Returns: 2025 Edition
    Look at who are predicting 6500 - 4 of 5 largest market participating banks. That is 6.5% from here. Probably easier to make that much with reasonably comfortable bond funds.
    David Giroux’s 5300 is a 14% drop from here. So many members of this forum are invested heavily with David.
    Thanks @bee and @stillers.
    @bee, @stillers, @WABAC, @rforno, . . .
    By how much are you reducing or have you reduced your equity allocation from the 2024 peak level?
    I can't give you hard numbers, but somewhere around 75% equity/25% cash to begin with in the IRA.
    I am now down to around 42% equity, 47% bonds, and 10% short-term (per Fido's dashboard) out of which cash is about 3%. I couldn't tell you how Fido makes that determination. They do show an M* style box that says I'm 84% short. For some reason USFR doesn't fit into the style box, and isn't qualified as cash, or other, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ .
    The current allocation has to do with the ongoing process of "simplifying" my IRA and not finding much to buy in the equity market these days.
    If there are buying opportunities in the next couple of years I wouldn't mind going to 50 to 60% equity. Who knows? Maybe Mr Market will carry me there on his back.
    The taxable is sui generis, so I won't go into it here.
  • "Experts" Forecast Stock and Bond Returns: 2025 Edition
    David Giroux’s 5300 is a 14% drop from here. So many members of this forum are invested heavily with David.
    It Giroux is right, I’d expect he’ll be on the cover of Barron’s shortly thereafter.
    If he misses by 25% …. ? ? ?
    Fame is a fickle food
    Upon a shifting plate
    Whose table once a
    Guest but not
    The second time is set.
    Whose crumbs the crows inspect
    And with ironic caw
    Flap past it to the Farmer's Corn –
    Men eat of it and die.

    - Emily Dickenson
  • "Experts" Forecast Stock and Bond Returns: 2025 Edition
    Look at who are predicting 6500 - 4 of 5 largest market participating banks. That is 6.5% from here. Probably easier to make that much with reasonably comfortable bond funds.
    David Giroux’s 5300 is a 14% drop from here. So many members of this forum are invested heavily with David.
    Thanks @bee and @stillers.
    @bee, @stillers, @WABAC, @rforno, . . .
    By how much are you reducing or have you reduced your equity allocation from the 2024 peak level?
  • Morningstar’s criticism re management turnover at Maning & Napier
    Thanks for all the comments. I’ve edited the thread’s caption slightly since I am no longer considering the Manning & Napier fund that prompted my inquiry.
    Regarding my other comments in the thread -
    There were a couple different spec plays I took on between late December and around mid-January. The first wager on FLO & NSRGY failed (again) and I lost a little. That money was applied to a second larger spec play - a basket of CEFs - which paid off quite well as I accumulated (ultimately 4) CEFs just as the 10-year Treasury neared 4.8%, rode the 10-year down to around 4.54% and then bailed out (8-10 days later) before rates again spiked. As I’d posted earlier in the B/S thread, falling rates help leveraged CEFs. All-in-all the spec plays (+ - 15% of portfolio) over a roughly 20 day period netted a small 5-7% gain. In the end, I ended up with 0 spec plays and a new long-term slug of money in GAA - a conservative fund not considered “speculative.”
    How this all relates to EXDAX? It was one of several “homes” being considered in late December for the spec money that was then in play.
    @FD1000 - I did not respond to your bond fund suggestion because the OP referenced a 20/80 type of fund and was intended to pertain primarily to M&N’s management team & reported management turnover.
  • $2500 for one hour for your time...(offer ends soon) - asset transfer bonus
    $2500 for one hour for your time...(offer ends soon)
    Anytime I try and do something in a hurry it ends up backfiring - sometimes badly. They say haste makes waste.
    Good one @Old_Joe! But “an hour”? More like 3 minutes.
  • On Bubble Watch - latest memo from Howard Marks
    A very quick look shows that
    VIX(SP500 SD) < 15
    MOVE(treasury SD)=87=low
    SP500 is in an uptrend.
    I don't need to check beyond that.
    My big picture = "normal" market = I'm invested at 99+% for several months now.

    but you're invested 99+% in bonds, not the SP500, and in "special" bonds that don't move the way most bond funds move, so your so-called big picture has no real relevancy, as per usual, to your own personal big picture, more or less, give or take.
    I have been saying the following over 15 years in all the sites I post.
    All my posts are generic, without any connection to what and how I invest, unless I specially discuss my system.
    The big picture is another generic comment.
    I make comments on CEFs and never owned them more than short term.
    I posted for years about retirement, LTC, when to take SS when I was younger.
    Is your view that you can only have an opinion based on what you own or do?
    So, what would I do specifically with my portfolio? I would be invested at 99% regardless if I have stocks or bonds. I have used stocks for decades.
    You can disregard all my opinions but why trash it based on no real data.
  • Buying Treasury floating rate notes at brokerages
    YBB, I think the OP wants them at Fido and VG. I no longer buy any bonds at Schwab. I just own bunch of USFR - I get that 15 bps is nothing to sneeze about and one does not have to worry about cap gain distributions from USFR. Your breakevens calc is helpful to readers. Said differently, one can save $3,000 over the two year period buying FRNs instead of USFR.
    Please elaborate on the spread you mentioned.
  • January MFO Ratings Posted
    Just posted all ratings to MFO Premium site, using Refinitiv data drop from Friday, 25 January 2025, reflecting risk and return metrics thru December. Flows remain posted through Friday, 17 January.
  • Buying Treasury floating rate notes at brokerages
    @BaluBalu, but due to weekly reset feature to 3m T-Bills, FRN duration is 1 week (not 2 years). Buying FRNs at auction at Schwab would be commission-free, so 15 bps in ER for USFR would be saved. The other thing is the (small) spread that is fixed at auction - I haven't been tracking those.
  • Buying Treasury floating rate notes at brokerages
    FRNs can be bought only through an agent, not online.
    @yogibb, thank you. I suspect that is the case. Wonder why?
    I am already using USFR, but wanting to save 0.15% fees. Next auction is at end of February 20205.
  • $2500 for one hour for your time...(offer ends soon) - asset transfer bonus
    "$2500 for one hour for your time..."
    When I saw that I thought that it was just another episode of Trump and some bimbo. Wells Fargo and Trump share a lot of perspectives, so I wasn't completely wrong.
  • On Bubble Watch - latest memo from Howard Marks
    A very quick look shows that
    VIX(SP500 SD) < 15
    MOVE(treasury SD)=87=low
    SP500 is in an uptrend.
    I don't need to check beyond that.
    My big picture = "normal" market = I'm invested at 99+% for several months now.

    but you're invested 99+% in bonds, not the SP500, and in "special" bonds that don't move the way most bond funds move, so you're so-called big picture has no real relevancy, as per usual, to your own personal big picture, more or less, give or take.
    Cut the guy some slack - he has an almost 97% success rate predicting the past..
  • Buying Treasury floating rate notes at brokerages
    Fido charges $19.95 for buying Treasuries through agents. FRNs can be bought only through an agent, not online.
    FRN USFR has 15 bps ER.
    Breakeven is 100*19.95/0.15 = $13,300.
    So, buying in amounts larger than $13.3K via Fido agent is worthwhile. Below that, buy USFR.
  • $2500 for one hour for your time...(offer ends soon) - asset transfer bonus
    $250K is a lot of money to lock up for 90 days. Several options to consider:
    1. 3 months T bill, expected yield 4.273% at Fidelity. No $ limit.
    2. money market funds yield 3.95-4.2%. No $ limit and holding period.