Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Tax info issues - check carefully
    Two of the four clearing houses generating my 1099s this year seem to have made errors. Always a good idea to check your numbers.
    Merrill didn't report my transfer bonus in a taxable account. Bonuses are generally treated as income - okay in IRAs, but should be reported for taxable accounts (as Merrill did for me in 2019).
    Typically bonuses show up on 1099-MISC's, line 3 (other income). Though Schwab says that "the bonus award will be reported on your Form 1099-INT. "
    Fidelity somewhat mistakenly charged me margin interest that it then refunded. In theory (my theory, at least) this whole transaction should be a non-event. But the 1099 supplemental info says that I paid margin interest (deductible). So the "refund" should be reported as income. That's the way it shows up on the website but not on the 1099. Something is amiss somewhere. Fidelity is investigating.
    Also at Fidelity: it has not yet posted for its funds how much income came from overnment securities (state tax-exempt) on its retail site.
    Thanks to a post on The Finance Buff for another place to find the numbers:
    https://institutional.fidelity.com/app/literature/item/842885.html
    Note that this page (for the "Investment Professional") says that it was updated Dec 31, 2024, so I can't tell whether these are final figures.
  • WealthTrack Show
    Feb 15th Episode:
    “Rethinking Investing” is legendary financial consultant Charley Ellis’ “eureka” moment when all his investment wisdom and experience came together in one short volume.
    ONE INVESTMENT
    ELLIS: LONG, LONG RUN INVESTMENT
    Buy a low cost index fund or ETF of your choice
    Slight tax benefit to ETFs


  • Trump says US prices ‘could go up’ as he threatens new tariffs on trade partners
    @WABAC,
    Bessent said last week that the administration is focused on long term (10 yr) rates because that is where capital investments happen and that they are not focused on federal funds rate.
    After the last FOMC meeting, Trump said the Fed was correct in not decreasing FF rate.
    You get the idea what is going on. His Chief of Staff and Bessent sat him down and told him to stick to the script. Whether you and I like it or not, the Trump economic agenda is highly ambitious and not easy to pull off and requires everyone on the team to be hyper focused. But the self proclaimed stable genius has the attention span and ego of _____.
    So, expect Trump to run his mouth on Powell after a few days because when his instincts kick in, it just irritates Trump that he is not able to bully Powell and that will make him look weak in the eyes of old MAGA. Of course, Fox is always ready rile Trump up, the co-dependents in the relationship.
  • Encouraged towards self-directed
    I agree with all of the comments that have been made here. Thanks.
    As it happens the accounts (all 4 of them) moved to self-directed within the last few hours.
    fyi, it is Wells Fargo Advisors. they have always been very friendly and helpful for years -- until this. The ironic thing is that the #1 reason I still had accounts there was out of a sense of loyalty.
    Anyway, I guess I'm feeling liberated. End of an era.
    So you moved to WellsTrade?
  • Morningstar article opines that “Autocracy Is a Bad Investment”

    for those interested in whether evidence can help make money on this theme, there are multiple good interviews from perth tolle, founder of the freedom index etf.
    of course this is a long-term strategy as regimes tend to move away\towards autocracy over (usually) long periods, despite the positive feedback loop beyond certain thresholds. (FYI, america swings within #10 and #20, which indicates home bias and liquidity overwhelms all other investment decisions)
    autocracy themes appeal to market timers, as they seem rather overconfident in regards to inter-nation geopolitics such as china invading taiwan, trump acquiring greenland\gaza, etc....
    something like regionalization of global trade, which affects dozens of nations jointly, seems a much more reasoned higher level abstraction.
  • Encouraged towards self-directed
    I agree with all of the comments that have been made here. Thanks.
    As it happens the accounts (all 4 of them) moved to self-directed within the last few hours.
    fyi, it is Wells Fargo Advisors. they have always been very friendly and helpful for years -- until this. The ironic thing is that the #1 reason I still had accounts there was out of a sense of loyalty.
    Anyway, I guess I'm feeling liberated. End of an era.
  • Morningstar article opines that “Autocracy Is a Bad Investment”

    Oh dear, did someone trigger FD1000 today?
    Just addressing Trigger. All things that cause one to lose their mind can make them to act similarly. For example, fans of a team that wins a championship riot (burning cars, breaking windows, etc.). A group that feels aggrieved by society also riot. Very different reasons (triggers) but to our eye the result is the same.
    Something that Trump did or said recently may have made them giddy. It is like a steroid (or fentanyl, depending on one’s disposition) shot to them. So, his fans can behave the same way they behaved the day after election intermittently throughout the next four years. Reasons can be varied when you have a “Coalition of Single Issue” voters.
    One can ignore entirely or go through the trash can trying to figure out what is what.
  • Goldman Sachs Global Real Estate Securities Fund will be liquidated
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/822977/000119312525026998/d919923d497.htm
    497 1 d919923d497.htm GOLDMAN SACHS TRUST
    GOLDMAN SACHS TRUST
    Class A, Class C, Institutional, Investor, Class R6 and Class P Shares of the
    Goldman Sachs Global Real Estate Securities Fund
    Supplement dated February 14, 2025 to the
    Prospectuses, Summary Prospectuses and Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”),
    each dated April 29, 2024, each as supplemented to date
    At a meeting held on February 11-12, 2025, upon the recommendation of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P., the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Goldman Sachs Trust (the “Trust”) approved a proposal to liquidate the Goldman Sachs Global Real Estate Securities Fund (the “Fund”), a series of the Trust. After careful consideration of a number of factors, the Board concluded that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders to liquidate the Fund. The Fund is expected to be liquidated on or about April 14, 2025 (the “Liquidation Date”), pursuant to a Plan of Liquidation approved by the Board. The Liquidation Date may be changed without notice at the discretion of the Trust’s officers.
    Suspension of Sales. Shares of the Fund will no longer be available for purchase as of the close of business on March 14, 2025, except that existing shareholders of the Fund may continue to purchase shares of the Fund until March 28, 2025. To the extent there are any dividend or distribution payments made prior to the Liquidation Date with respect to the Fund, they will continue to be paid either in cash, in additional shares of the Fund, or in shares of other Goldman Sachs Funds, depending on each shareholder’s current election, as disclosed in the Prospectuses.
    Liquidation of Assets. Effective immediately, the Fund may depart from its stated investment objective and policies as it prepares to liquidate and distribute its assets to shareholders. It is anticipated that the Fund’s portfolio will be positioned into cash, cash equivalents or other liquid assets on or prior to the Liquidation Date. In connection with the liquidation, all outstanding shares of the Fund on the Liquidation Date will be automatically redeemed by the Fund. Each shareholder of record of the Fund on the Liquidation Date will receive proceeds of the automatic redemptions equal to the shareholder’s proportionate interest in the Fund’s net assets plus accrued and unpaid earnings of the Fund at the time of liquidation. Shares held in custodial IRA accounts directly with the Fund’s transfer agent on the Liquidation Date will be exchanged for the equivalent share class of the Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund, a registered money market fund, unless an alternative direction is provided prior to the Liquidation Date. The liquidation of the Fund’s portfolio will result in increased transaction costs, which must be borne by the Fund and its shareholders and may result in higher capital gains for taxable shareholders. Shareholders should contact their tax advisers concerning the tax consequences of the liquidation.
    Other Alternatives. At any time prior to the Liquidation Date, shareholders may redeem their shares of the Fund and receive the net asset value thereof in cash or in-kind, as provided in the Prospectuses. Shareholders may also exchange their shares for shares of the same class of another Goldman Sachs Fund at net asset value without imposition of an initial sales charge or a contingent deferred sales charge. Redemption of shares by current shareholders between February 14, 2025 and the Liquidation Date will not be subject to any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.
    Certain shareholders may redeem all or a portion of their shares of the Fund before the Liquidation Date, and as a result the Fund and its remaining shareholders may experience adverse effects. These shareholder redemptions may also negatively impact a Fund’s net asset value per share.
    This Supplement should be retained with your Prospectuses, Summary Prospectuses and SAI for future reference.
    RESLIQSTK 02-25
  • Encouraged towards self-directed
    Maybe it's time to move to another brokerage? Some Brokerages will do most of the work for you & possible give you a bonus $$$
    +1 if my only remaining full service broker pulled that on me or gave me that attitude (and like you, I don't trade it very often) my account would be moved that week. As it is, I only have a few more years to stay with that firm, but after that (or my guy retires) I have no qualms transferring out ... paying ~$200 per occasional trade nauseates me no end but for family reasons, I keep the account there.
    The only way to make a point with a fullservice broker (or any broker) is to move your account and hit the broker by reducing his AUM 'book' --- I'm sure they'll contact you to ask why you're leaving and perhaps try to sweeten an offer to get you to stay. lol
  • Encouraged towards self-directed
    Can someone explain the dynamics of this to me?
    My family has had the same brokerage accounts since at least the early 1960s.The company names have changed and changed again, but the offices have stayed the same. The first one I remember was Thompson-Mckinnon.
    We have never traded a lot, and therefore didn't generate a whole bunch of commissions, but I was willing to pay a couple hundred dollars every now and then, both for the personal assistance and out of a sense of loyalty. Our longtime broker passed away a few years ago, but things still continued apace.
    Recently, an order got put through a little bit wrong, and when I asked them to correct it, they did so, but were sure to let me know that it was costing them money, and I sensed some frustration on their part.
    In the same conversation the broker told me they were advisors and people paid them for advice, but since I made my own decisions, I should move all of the accounts to the self-directed system. So that's what I'm doing (although it is taking forever to happen).
    In a recent conversation, the broker said that I was holding full service accounts, but that I was "unwilling to pay them".
    That kind of hurts my feelings. We have been good clients for over half of a century. They've made at least some money consistently over that time, and they would continue, but as I said, we're not big traders, and the commissions would continue to be few and far between. btw, by middle class standards, the accounts are fairly large.
    Essentially, they don't want me anymore. This makes no sense to me, but That's what we're going with.
    Does this make any sense to you? Does this fit a recent pattern in the industry? I guess things change, but this seems weird to me.
  • T Rowe Price ETFs in registration
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1795351/000174177325000434/c485apos.htm
    T. Rowe Price Financials ETF
    T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF
    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
    T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF
    T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
  • Buy Sell Why: ad infinitum.
    Sold 1/3 of T-C for a tiny gain. The first call is next week, and while I doubt it'll be called (which would be fine by me) I'm doing some minor portfolio adjusting.
    Might close out the entire position and reallocate into other preferreds and/or MLPs.
  • Trump says US prices ‘could go up’ as he threatens new tariffs on trade partners
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/record-stock-fragility-sends-warning-103000061.html
    Stock fragility, a measure of a company’s daily share-price move relative to its recent volatility, is on track to reach its highest in more than 30 years among the largest 50 stocks in the S&P 500 Index, based on the average magnitude and frequency of such individual shocks so far in 2025, according to Bank of America Corp. strategists.
    How does tariff theater play into this?
    “The sideways range the stock market has been in for almost three months is hiding a big increase in volatility for individual stocks,” Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co., said via email. “When you combine this with higher bond yields and concerns over tariffs, it has created a much higher level of uncertainty and nervousness than we usually see when the market is near an all-time high.”
  • The Problem Explained: Never Too Much
    Let me guess.
    Dems=great. GOP=Terrible. Until the next election we will see daily articles like thism
    The only problem is that great Dems used to be Kennedy and Clinton. Something to ponder.
    Instead of posting this poppycock, as difficult as it is for you, try explaining how Americans benefit by the sudden closure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
  • Another reason to leave Grandeur Peaks?!
    Here is the email I received this evening from GP:
    Feb 13, 2025
    Dear Fellow Investors,
    Mark Madsen, portfolio manager (PM) for our Global Contrarian strategy and the industrials tranche of our Global Reach strategy, has decided to leave the firm to pursue a new opportunity.
    Robert Gardiner, Grandeur Peak’s chairman and co-founder, is nearing the conclusion of his three-year service sabbatical. When he returns this summer, he plans to be a PM on Global Contrarian, as well as a PM on the Global and International Opportunities Funds.
    Robert is a strong believer in Global Contrarian, having pioneered the idea of a value fund in a growth shop and launching small and micro-cap value funds over two decades ago while at Wasatch Global Investors. He was the driving force behind the launch of Global Contrarian in 2019 and acted as its Guardian PM for its first three years.
    Until Robert’s return, Blake Walker, CEO, will serve as the interim PM on the Global Contrarian Fund. He’ll be joined by Dane Nielson, who has worked directly on the Fund for most of its five-year life.
    Our Industrials sector research will continue to be covered by Matt Kaelberer and Cyrus Crockett. Matt and Cyrus will report directly to Randy Pearce, CIO, who will provide oversight and support.
    As we frequently explain, one of Grandeur Peak’s most distinguishing features is that all of our portfolios rely heavily on the work done by our sector and geography teams. This team-driven structure allows us to fully leverage our “multiple minds” investment philosophy and mitigate key person risk.
    If you have any questions related to this news, please reach out to a member of our Client Relations Team.
  • Trump says US prices ‘could go up’ as he threatens new tariffs on trade partners
    Really?
    So why Mexico, Canada, and others made a change?
    If this was true, the SP500 would be down at least 10%...but it's close to the top.
    Another TDS thread.
    Please use the off topic forum.
  • Trump says US prices ‘could go up’ as he threatens new tariffs on trade partners
    It seems reasonable to suggest that "prices could go up" bears indirectly on "Other Investing".
    Trump said he would not commission any studies into how his mooted tariffs could affect prices for Americans. “There’s nothing to study,” he said. “It’s going to go well.”
    Edited excerpts from a current article in The Guardian.
    Donald Trump threatened to ramp up his economic assault on some of America’s biggest trading partners on Thursday, vowing to impose new tariffs on countries that target products made in the US within weeks.
    The US will impose “reciprocal” duties, the president announced. “We want a level playing field,” he declared in the Oval Office, pledging to roll out a “beautiful, simple system” of new US import duties that match those imposed by other countries.
    No new specific tariffs were announced, however, triggering a relief rally on Wall Street. Instead, Trump signed a presidential memorandum ordering the development of a comprehensive plan to address what the White House described as “longstanding imbalances” in the global economy.
    Americans could face “some short-term disturbance” if the US imposes higher tariffs on foreign goods, Trump acknowledged. “Prices could go up somewhat short-term,” he said. “But prices will also go down.”
    “What will go up is jobs,” claimed Trump. “The jobs will go up tremendously.”
    It is the latest bid by Trump to strain Washington’s trade ties with countries across the world – allies and rivals alike – to obtain political and economic concessions.
    A press notice circulated by the Trump administration promised it would take action to “put the American worker first, improve our competitiveness in every area of industry, reduce our trade deficit, and bolster our economic and national security”.
    US officials pointed to a series of examples of tariffs and other trade barriers that they said demonstrated how other countries were not treating the US fairly. They pointed to the European Union’s 10% tariff on cars, alongside the 2.5% US tariff on cars, and claimed that shellfish from 48 states cannot be exported to the EU, while the bloc “can export all the shellfish it wants to America”.
    They also cited a 100% tariff imposed by India on US motorcycles, while the US only charges 2.4%, and an 18% duty in Brazil on US ethanol, while the US charges 2.5%.
    Trump also called for Russia’s return to the G7 group of industrialised nations, saying it had been a mistake for Moscow to be expelled. Russia was suspended from the group – then known as the G8 – in 2014, following the annexation of Crimea, and announced its permanent withdrawal in 2017.
    The administration has so far threatened more tariffs than it has introduced. Duties on Colombia were shelved when it agreed to accept military aircraft carrying deported immigrants; duties on Canada and Mexico have been repeatedly delayed; and modified duties on steel and aluminum, announced earlier this week, will not be enforced until next month.
    An additional 10% tariff on goods from China is, for now, the only threatened trade attack actually enforced since Trump returned to the White House. On Friday, it emerged that a key component of this – removing the longstanding duty-free status of low-cost packages – had been delayed.
    Inflation is already proving stubborn. In January, as Trump returned to office, it ticked up to an annualized rate of 3%. Egg prices have been soaring in recent months, as many US consumers continue to grapple with the elevated cost of living.
    Trump said he would not commission any studies into how his mooted tariffs could affect prices for Americans. “There’s nothing to study,” he said. “It’s going to go well.”
    Asked whether the Trump administration’s plan to align US tariffs with those imposed by other countries risked raising prices for US consumers, Lutnick – standing alongside the president – sought to shift responsibility onto other countries. “​If they drop their tariffs, prices for Americans are going down​,”​ he said.
    Trump has frequently highlighted the US’s trade deficit with the world – the fact that the value of its imports greatly exceeds that of its exports – as evidence of unfairness.
    “Closed markets” overseas reduce US exports, while “open markets at home result in significant imports”, the White House notice said, arguing that this had undercut the US’s ability to compete.