Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Vanguard Primecap Core Fund
    VPCCX has been closed to most new investors for a while.
    Vanguard Flagship/PAS customers can open new accounts in VPCCX without any purchase limitations.
    Vanguard Flagship customers can open new Primecap (VPMCX) or Capital Opportunity (VHCOX)
    accounts and invest up to $25K per fund account per year.
    Vanguard PAS customers can open new Primecap (VPMCX) accounts and invest up to $25K
    per fund account per year; they can open new Capital Opportunity accounts without any purchase limitations.
  • Lord Abbett Durable Growth Fund to liquidate
    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/898031/000093041322001695/c104545_497.htm
    LORD ABBETT SECURITIES TRUST
    Lord Abbett Durable Growth Fund (the “Fund”)
    Supplement dated September 27, 2022 to the
    Summary Prospectus, Prospectus, and Statement of Additional Information of the Fund,
    each dated March 1, 2022, as supplemented
    Liquidation of the Fund
    On September 27, 2022, the Board of Trustees of Lord Abbett Securities Trust approved, subject to shareholder approval, a plan of liquidation (the “Plan”) pursuant to which the Fund will be liquidated and dissolved (the “Liquidation”).
    It is currently contemplated that holders of shares of the Fund as of September 30, 2022 (the “Record Date”) will be asked to approve the Liquidation at a special meeting of shareholders to be held on or about October 25, 2022. If the Liquidation is approved, it is currently anticipated that the Liquidation and dissolution of the Fund will be completed on or around October 28, 2022 (the “Liquidation Date”). Any Fund shares outstanding on the Liquidation Date will be automatically redeemed on the Liquidation Date. The proceeds of any such redemption will be equal to the net asset value (“NAV”) of such shares after dividend distributions required to eliminate any Fund-level taxes are made, the Fund’s expenses and liabilities have been paid or otherwise provided for as directed by the Plan, and the Fund has distributed to its shareholders of record the remaining proceeds in one or more liquidating distributions on the Liquidation Date as set forth in the Plan.
    At any time before the Liquidation Date, shareholders may redeem their Fund shares at the NAV of such shares pursuant to the procedures set forth under “Purchases and Redemptions” in the prospectus.
    In connection with the Liquidation of the Fund, the Fund no longer will accept purchase orders or exchange requests as of September 30, 2022.
    Please retain this document for your future reference.
    The foregoing is not a solicitation of any proxy. For more information regarding the Fund, or to receive a free copy of materials filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), please visit Lord Abbett’s website at www.lordabbett.com/documentsandliterature. Free copies of these materials can also be found on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Please read the proxy statement carefully when it becomes available in the coming weeks because it will contain important information. Officers and employees of Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC may be deemed to be participants in any future solicitation of the Fund’s shareholders in connection with the forthcoming meeting of shareholders. Shareholders may obtain information regarding the names, affiliations, and interests of these individuals in the Fund’s proxy statement when it becomes available.
  • Vanguard Primecap Core Fund
    The rules are different for each fund. I believe that when Core was closed previously, Flagship customers were allowed to invest an unlimited amount, unlike the other Primecaps.
    From the prospectus:
    The Fund is closed to new accounts for investors not enrolled in Vanguard Flagship Services® or Vanguard Personal Advisor Services®. Clients of these services may open new Fund accounts, without purchase limitations, in individual, joint, and/or personal trust registrations
    The $25K limit applies to existing investors who are not Flagship customers.
  • 2022 YTD Damage
    9/27/22
    SPY -0.26%, BND -0.44%, LQD -1.50%, VBINX -0.23%
    So, the problem with VWINX -0.78% was its corporates.
    Nonetheless, VWINX had the largest decline among the hybrid funds (MA, CA, multi-asset) on my watchlist, and FPURX -0.14% the smallest decline. Go figure!
  • Bond Volatility MOVE
    9/27/22
    Bond/Treasuries ^MOVE 158.12 (high)
    SP500 ^VIX 32.60 (high)
    SP500 ^SKEW 120.39 (not high)
  • Why 2022 Has Been Such a Terrible Year for Bond Funds
    Folks (not just @hank), when you quote something, or even just state a figure, please give the source. The quote above seems to have come from here:
    https://lplresearch.com/2022/05/24/how-do-bonds-perform-during-and-after-equity-bear-markets/
    I gave figures for 10 year Treasuries. One can't get higher grade than that. Though both longer and shorter term Treasuries are included as well in aggregate figures.
    Below is the data table in the quoted piece. For many reasons (enumerated below) I discount it. The conclusion given may or may not be correct, but it is not well stated and the arithmetic is suspect.
    image
    Issues:
    1. "Falling" market, as hank described it, is different from "equity bear markets", which is in the text. However, the data itself covers "Bear (And Near Bear) Markets". This fuzzy definition doubles the number of data points (increasing the number of rows from 6 to 11).
    For bear markets and corrections, see p. 4 here:
    https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500corrbeartables.pdf
    2. It uses a fairly short time frame (Yogi and I provided data over twice as many years).
    3. The "average" values in the chart are unweighted. A "bear-ish" market of one month 2/19/20 to 3/23/20 counts as much as a "bear-ish" market of 2½ years 3/24/2000 to 10/9/2002. Arguably weighting is incorporated by using cumulative returns (i.e. total return over each bear-ish market), but that just fixes (weights) the numerator without adjusting the denominator for the mean.
    4. The medians are dubious. With 11 rows, the (unweighted) median should be the 6th highest (or 6th lowest) figure in each column. That's what is presented for the first column (1.8). But in the other columns, the median isn't a value in the column, let alone the middle one.
  • 2022 YTD Damage
    And how about the even more conservative( about 29% equity) VTINX which is off -15.77% YTD as of yesterday. Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund is my benchmark and I am happy to say I am beating it handily.
  • 2022 YTD Damage
    Bonds were so weak today, 9/26/22, that several allocation funds lost MORE than SP500. Here are several familiar ones:
    Moderate-allocation BALFX, DODBX, FBALX, FPURX, VBINX, VGSTX, VSMGX, VWELX
    Conservative-allocation TRRIX, VTINX, VSCGX, VWINX
    Multi-asset FMSDX, VPGDX
    Key are benchmarks SPY -0.99%, BND -1.28%, LQD -1.74%, VBINX -1.16% (Bond/Treasury volatility MOVE jumped up +11.9%)
    Same thing Tuesday again:
    VWINX: -.78%
    VFINX -.21%
    I’m thinking those conservative investors in VWINX might be fleeing in droves. Didn’t expect or sign-up for double-diget losses (off -14.36% YTD)
  • Why 2022 Has Been Such a Terrible Year for Bond Funds
    Thanks @msf for that comparison. I was thinking of the highest grade bonds (government agency or government backed) when I alluded to bonds holding up well when stocks are falling. Should have so stated. And, my intent was to reference equity bear markets similar to what we are experiencing. (Should have so stated) Looking at it that way produces a different result.
    “(Bonds) have historically performed well during equity bear markets, as measured by the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (Agg), returning over 6% on average. Of the three primary sub-components of the Agg, U.S. Treasuries bonds performed the best (+8.4% on average), living up to their safe haven profile, while corporate bonds, which introduce credit risk, have performed the worst (+2.6% on average)”
    Source
  • Fears of sabotage as gas pours into Baltic from Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines
    Seismologists detect spikes in undersea activity, possibly indicating explosions, amid three simultaneous leaks
    A current report from The Guardian

    image
    Following are excerpts from the report, severely edited for brevity:
    Gas is pouring into the Baltic Sea from three separate leaks on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines amid claims by seismologists in Sweden and Denmark of two sharp spikes in undersea activity, possibly indicating explosions, and speculation about sabotage.
    A seismograph on the Danish island of Bornholm, near where the leaks occurred, twice recorded spikes on Monday, the day on which the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines underwent dramatic falls in pressure, the German geological research centre GFZ said.
    A Danish military flight over the leaks brought back striking images from the ruptures, including one showing an area of bubbling gas a kilometre wide on the sea’s surface.
    The seismograph recorded near-silence until just after midnight GMT (2am local time), when there was a spike representing a tremor in the earth followed by a continuous hissing wave form. The pattern was repeated at 5pm GMT.
    Amid the speculation over sabotage, suspicion immediately turned to potential culprits – with fingers pointed at Russia, whose pipelines were hit, suggesting a further weaponisation of energy supplies to Europe in the midst of the conflict in Ukraine. Not least it was seen as a possible message about the vulnerability of other marine gas infrastructure.
    “There are some indications that it is deliberate damage. You have to ask: Who would profit?” one European security source told Reuters. The Danish prime minister said sabotage could not be excluded. Poland’s foreign minister was more forthright, suggesting that the damage could be an act of provocation on behalf of the Kremlin.
    Meanwhile the Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, called the news “very concerning” and said that “no option can be ruled out right now”, including sabotage.
    The steel pipe itself has a wall of 4.1 cm (1.6 inches) and is coated with steel-reinforced concrete up to 11cm thick. Each section of the pipe weighs 11 tonnes, which goes to 24-25 tonnes after the concrete is applied.
    British sources said they believed it may not be possible to determine what occurred with certainty.
    One UK insider speculated that any explosions were unlikely to have been caused by a submarine or underwater vehicle, because their presence would have been detected in the relatively shallow Baltic waters. Sections of the pipelines are between 80 metres and 110 metres deep.
    The day of drama began when the Danish energy agency said it had found the leaks on the Nord Stream 1 pipeline north-east of the island of Bornholm, and a third in the Nord Stream 2 pipeline in Swedish waters south-east of the island. “This is not a small crack. It’s a really big hole,” the energy agency said.
    Underlining the significance of the event, Javier Blas, an energy and commodities commentator for Bloomberg, described the undersea gas pipelines in the region as one of Europe’s most important strategic assets. “The subsea pipelines linking the North Sea gas fields, and then Norway with the rest of the continent and the UK are among the most strategic assets right now for Europe. High time for maximum protection. Cyber-attacks against energy assets are, too, a key risk for Europe,” Blas tweeted.
    A five-mile exclusion zone for shipping has been set up around Bornholm, and flights below 1,000 metres have been banned in the area. Methane, the primary component of natural gas, partially dissolves in water, is not toxic and creates no hazard when inhaled in limited quantities.
    “Breakage of gas pipelines is extremely rare”, Danish authorities said in a statement. “Therefore we see reason to raise the preparedness level as a result of the incidents we have seen over the past 24 hours.”
    Nord Stream AG, the pipeline operator, had on Monday morning reported an unexpected overnight drop of pressure from 105 to 7 bar in Nord Stream 2, which is filled with gas but was cancelled by Olaf Scholz, the German chancellor, shortly before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
    A further drop of pressure was reported on Monday afternoon in Nord Stream 1, which Russia shut down indefinitely at the start of September, initially saying it needed repairs.
    Since no gas has flowed through either of the pipelines since the start of the month, German authorities have been quick to reassure people that the leaks will not affect its plan to fill gas storage tanks in time for winter.
    Environmental NGOs said the leaks were likely to cause large-scale damage to the environment. “As soon as methane in gas form raises from the surface of the sea into the atmosphere, it will massively contribute to the greenhouse effect,” said Sascha Müller-Kraenner of the pressure group Environmental Action Germany.
    Note: This report was previously posted in the ongoing "What is a 'Blood in the Streets' Moment?" thread. It's being posted here for those who may not be following that particular thread.
  • What is a “Blood in the Streets” Moment?
    Fears of sabotage as gas pours into Baltic from Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines
    Seismologists detect spikes in undersea activity, possibly indicating explosions, amid three simultaneous leaks
    image
    A current report from The Guardian

    Following are excerpts from the report, severely edited for brevity:
    Gas is pouring into the Baltic Sea from three separate leaks on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines amid claims by seismologists in Sweden and Denmark of two sharp spikes in undersea activity, possibly indicating explosions, and speculation about sabotage.
    A seismograph on the Danish island of Bornholm, near where the leaks occurred, twice recorded spikes on Monday, the day on which the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines underwent dramatic falls in pressure, the German geological research centre GFZ said.
    A Danish military flight over the leaks brought back striking images from the ruptures, including one showing an area of bubbling gas a kilometre wide on the sea’s surface.
    The seismograph recorded near-silence until just after midnight GMT (2am local time), when there was a spike representing a tremor in the earth followed by a continuous hissing wave form. The pattern was repeated at 5pm GMT.
    Amid the speculation over sabotage, suspicion immediately turned to potential culprits – with fingers pointed at Russia, whose pipelines were hit, suggesting a further weaponisation of energy supplies to Europe in the midst of the conflict in Ukraine. Not least it was seen as a possible message about the vulnerability of other marine gas infrastructure.
    “There are some indications that it is deliberate damage. You have to ask: Who would profit?” one European security source told Reuters. The Danish prime minister said sabotage could not be excluded. Poland’s foreign minister was more forthright, suggesting that the damage could be an act of provocation on behalf of the Kremlin.
    Meanwhile the Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, called the news “very concerning” and said that “no option can be ruled out right now”, including sabotage.
    The steel pipe itself has a wall of 4.1 cm (1.6 inches) and is coated with steel-reinforced concrete up to 11cm thick. Each section of the pipe weighs 11 tonnes, which goes to 24-25 tonnes after the concrete is applied.
    British sources said they believed it may not be possible to determine what occurred with certainty.
    One UK insider speculated that any explosions were unlikely to have been caused by a submarine or underwater vehicle, because their presence would have been detected in the relatively shallow Baltic waters. Sections of the pipelines are between 80 metres and 110 metres deep.
    The day of drama began when the Danish energy agency said it had found the leaks on the Nord Stream 1 pipeline north-east of the island of Bornholm, and a third in the Nord Stream 2 pipeline in Swedish waters south-east of the island. “This is not a small crack. It’s a really big hole,” the energy agency said.
    Underlining the significance of the event, Javier Blas, an energy and commodities commentator for Bloomberg, described the undersea gas pipelines in the region as one of Europe’s most important strategic assets. “The subsea pipelines linking the North Sea gas fields, and then Norway with the rest of the continent and the UK are among the most strategic assets right now for Europe. High time for maximum protection. Cyber-attacks against energy assets are, too, a key risk for Europe,” Blas tweeted.
    A five-mile exclusion zone for shipping has been set up around Bornholm, and flights below 1,000 metres have been banned in the area. Methane, the primary component of natural gas, partially dissolves in water, is not toxic and creates no hazard when inhaled in limited quantities.
    “Breakage of gas pipelines is extremely rare”, Danish authorities said in a statement. “Therefore we see reason to raise the preparedness level as a result of the incidents we have seen over the past 24 hours.”
    Nord Stream AG, the pipeline operator, had on Monday morning reported an unexpected overnight drop of pressure from 105 to 7 bar in Nord Stream 2, which is filled with gas but was cancelled by Olaf Scholz, the German chancellor, shortly before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
    A further drop of pressure was reported on Monday afternoon in Nord Stream 1, which Russia shut down indefinitely at the start of September, initially saying it needed repairs.
    Since no gas has flowed through either of the pipelines since the start of the month, German authorities have been quick to reassure people that the leaks will not affect its plan to fill gas storage tanks in time for winter.
    Environmental NGOs said the leaks were likely to cause large-scale damage to the environment. “As soon as methane in gas form raises from the surface of the sea into the atmosphere, it will massively contribute to the greenhouse effect,” said Sascha Müller-Kraenner of the pressure group Environmental Action Germany.
    Note: I'm also going to post this as a new topic for those who may not be following this particular thread.
  • Why 2022 Has Been Such a Terrible Year for Bond Funds
    Generally, falling equities are good news for bonds.
    Out of 94 years (1928-2021 inclusive), bonds rose over 80% of the time: 76 years (80.8%). Stocks fell in 25 of those years. Random chance would suggest that bonds would rise in 20 of those years. The actual number was 21.
    Falling equities are good news for bonds merely because bonds have good news 4/5 of the time, regardless of what happens in equities.
    Data source: https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/histretSP.html
    A more interesting question IMHO is whether bonds outperform (their arithmetic average) in years when stocks underperform (their arithmetic average).
    Over the same span of years, stocks had 8 more above average years (51) than below average years (43). Bonds had 28 more below average years (61) than above average years (33).
    It turns out that in 54 years (57%), stocks and bonds had opposite fortunes - one asset class outperforming its mean, the other underperforming its mean. This may still not be all that significant.
    Bonds help stabilize a portfolio in much the same way cash does - adding deadweight and almost always (80% of the time or more) kicking in a little extra.
  • What is a “Blood in the Streets” Moment?
    Following up on the prospect that Europe is in serious difficulty and the possibility that "this time it may be different", here's an overview on the world economy from this morning's Wall Street Journal.
    Russia’s War in Ukraine to Cost Global Economy $2.8 Trillion, OECD Says—
    Research body says loss of output could be larger if Europe faces energy shortages during a severe winter
    Following are excerpts from the WSJ article, severely edited for brevity:
    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will cost the global economy $2.8 trillion in lost output by the end of next year—and even more if a severe winter leads to energy rationing in Europe—the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said Monday.
    The estimate by the Paris-based club of advanced economies lays bare the magnitude of the economic fallout from the biggest military conflict on the continent since World War II. Russia’s attack has sparked a surge in energy prices that has weakened household spending and undermined business confidence, particularly in Europe.
    Western governments fear that Russia’s order of a partial mobilization and its preparations to annex swaths of Ukraine could prolong the conflict for many months, perhaps years, further fueling the uncertainty now weighing on the global economy.
    The OECD expects the eurozone economy to grow by just 0.3% in 2023, with Germany’s economy set to contract by 0.7%. When it last released forecasts in June, the research body expected to see growth of 1.6% in the eurozone and 1.7% in Germany.
    The OECD warned that Europe’s economy could suffer an even sharper downturn if energy prices were to rise again. Should natural-gas prices rise by 50% over the remainder of the year, European economic growth could be 1.3 percentage points lower in 2023, while the global economy would grow by just 1.7%.
    Such a surge in prices could arise if Europe faces energy shortages over the coming winter, driven by particularly low temperatures. To reduce that risk, the OECD estimates that energy consumption will need to fall by between 10% and 15% compared with recent years.
    The cost of supporting households and businesses is pushing government debts higher, and that has led to an increase in borrowing costs that may further weaken growth. To avoid further big rises in debt, the OECD said that help should be targeted at the most vulnerable households.
    It estimates that the 35 governments whose policies it tracks have committed to spending roughly $150 billion on broad-based measures to keep prices down through December of this year, compared with around $15 billion on more targeted price measures.
    The OECD lowered its forecast for U.S. economic growth in 2023 to 0.5% from 1.2% previously, but said a steeper slowdown is possible if inflation doesn’t fall as rapidly as the Federal Reserve hopes.
    The organization expects China’s economy to rebound modestly in 2023 from sluggish growth in 2022 that reflects lockdowns to contain the Covid-19 pandemic. In June, the OECD forecast growth of 4.4% in 2022, but now expects to see an expansion of just 3.2%. For 2023, it projects growth of 4.7%.
    “The forecast for this year is for the lowest growth since the 1970s, with the exception of the pandemic,” said the OECD. “Next year, we expect growth that is still significantly lower than has been registered in China for a long time.”
  • 2022 YTD Damage
    “GM Steps Back on Return to Office Policy” (after worker backlash)
    https://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/general-motors/2022/09/27/gm-return-to-office-detroit-work-appropriately/69520262007/
    Larry Summers came very close on Friday’s WSW (Bloomberg) to suggesting the work-at-home policies are cutting into productivity and adding to inflation. The logic: Overall, employees might be working less hard at home than they would in an office and may be taking longer breaks. (Imagine that!) Thus, the labor costs for a given product rise. It’s the equivalent of paying workers a higher salary. Summers did some numbers crunching using a loss of 15 minutes per week per worker (or thereabouts) and multiplying it by the number of workers. Came to a substantial loss of productivity / increase in labor cost per goods & services produced when viewed in that way.
  • 2022 YTD Damage
    I'm wondering if the employment/unemployment picture is becoming fragmented. There are many reports of large layoffs in businesses and financial operations which are large-scale operations. But, as Crash mentions, not so much in smaller local businesses, largely retail, restaurant, and other "service" type jobs.
    I'm guessing that the overall employment picture may be more complex than is generally being reported. It may be that the reporting mechanisms were not designed to accurately reflect the situation that we have right now, and therefore don't give us sufficient granularity.
    That's a repeat of something that I speculated on a few days ago. In this morning's Wall Street Journal there's a report that suggests that that's actually the case:
    Here's excerpts from that report, severely edited for brevity:
    The economy is weakening, big companies from Ford to Facebook’s parent are cutting jobs or freezing hiring and inflation is eating into household budgets. Yet for many small-business owners, finding workers is as difficult as ever.
    More than one-third of small businesses said hiring challenges had worsened in the three months ended Sept. 1, according to a Goldman Sachs survey of nearly 1,500 small-business owners. Forty-seven percent of them said finding and retaining qualified employees was the most significant problem small businesses faced, up from 43% in the survey released in June.
    Nearly 60% of small companies report that worker shortages are affecting their ability to operate at full capacity, according to a September survey of more than 725 small-business owners.
    Nearly 80% of small-business owners said they have increased wages and compensation in response to hiring challenges, according to the survey, and another 11% plan to do so. In addition, 60% of small businesses have refined their recruiting strategies, while 46% have boosted employee benefits.
    Some small-business owners say they see the job market easing at the margins. William Duff Jr., founder and managing principal of William Duff Architects Inc. in San Francisco, said the firm is getting more applications for junior-level jobs that require six to seven years of experience or less. Senior architects are harder to find, he said. The 30-person firm, which struggled most of the year to fill job openings, handed out raises at the start of the year and again in the summer.
    Boudreau Pipeline Corp., based in Corona, Calif., says it has turned down more than $13 million in work this year, roughly 22% of the amount it has been awarded, because it doesn’t have enough staff. The roughly 350-person company installs underground utilities, water, sewer and storm drains.
    “It’s frustrating,” said the company’s president, Alan Boudreau, who figures he could easily employ 50 more people. The company has boosted wages by 22% over the past two years and added three in-house recruiters. It offers hiring bonuses of as much as $2,500 and retention bonuses of up to $5,000, provided workers stay at least one year. In early 2021, the company boosted referral bonuses to as much as $1,500, up from $150 four years ago. Referrals are the best source of new hires, Mr. Boudreau said.
    In August, Vladimir Gendelman eliminated college-degree requirements from all job positions at his Company Folders Inc., a Pontiac, Mich., maker of custom presentation folders, binders and envelopes. He came up with the idea after promoting his executive-assistant to a job as print project manager, though she didn’t have any skills or training in printing, prepress or graphic design.
    “We realized we don’t need an education,” he said. “We need somebody who is learning on their own, somebody who can figure things out.”

  • Why 2022 Has Been Such a Terrible Year for Bond Funds
    Sobering news indeed...
    "For example, the largest U.S. bond fund strategy, the $514.5 billion Vanguard Total Bond Market Index (VBMFX) is down 12.12% through Sept. 13, putting it on track for its worst year since its inception in 1986."
    "The Vanguard fund has never posted two consecutive years of negative returns, and this year’s losses are much more extreme than those seen in other down years. Its biggest annual loss came in 1994 when it posted a 2.66% decline."
    "In fact, 2022 may be on its way to the record books for more than just the size of the losses. This could be the first time on record that all types of bond funds have declined together in the same year. Every one of Morningstar’s 20 taxable bond categories is in negative territory for the year through Sept. 13."
  • What is a “Blood in the Streets” Moment?
    Have Stocks Become Cheap?
    John Rekenthaler's view:
    "Today’s stock prices are nowhere near cheap enough to forestall further losses, should the economic news worsen. If the Federal Reserve is still raising interest rates early into next year, and/or corporate earnings head firmly south, then equities will take a further beating. If, however, the economy avoids those problems, then stocks figure to rally. As the 30-year averages show, equities can profit handsomely at these levels - assuming the economy plays its part."
  • Any Funds You're Hoping Will Reopen Because of the Bear Market?
    New accounts for PRWCX can be opened if you hold a minimum $250,000 balance directly with TRP. That minimum balance can be spread across different funds, including brokerage accounts.
  • 2022 YTD Damage
    Not sure could be deadcat bounce today
    One manager wrote recently if have upswings for few days tradings (3 4 days) >80s% stocks positives may shift market breadth, despite negative bad news (unemployment interest rates imploding etc), sp500 dowjones still upswings and may develope new transitions / inflicted points.
    Only time will tell
    Keep following Tommy Lee fundstrat, he maybe an idiot keep saying sp500 moon 5000s next yr. Hard to say he maybe right but unclear if sp500 at those levels end 2023 or 2024. Need to quit those koolaids
  • What is a “Blood in the Streets” Moment?
    Corporate financing is I believe similar in determination to that of individuals, based on credit history and cash flow. Depending on the environment and type of debt, lenders want borrowers to have the debt be below a multiple of cash flow or in technical terms EBITDA or EBIT—I forget which. So you’ll hear “that company has a 5x EBITDA debt level.” The higher the number is, the greater the default risk. So stock valuation has little to do with this.
    The type of debt matters a great deal, though. Say the debt is floating rate. Just like in the 2007-08 mortgage crisis with floating rate mortgage loans, many corporate borrowers today may be regretting their decision to go that floating-rate route as rates rise. I expect there will be some defaults there.The other thing that matters for borrowers is the maturity of the debt. While investors tend to like short-term debt in a rising rate environment, it’s not so great for borrowers. Suddenly, the borrower not only has to pay the interest but the debt’s principal back in its entirety when that debt matures. Then, if they still need debt, they have to issue new debt in a higher rate less credit friendly environment. There may thus be more default risk in short-term debt than long.