It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I'm fine with accepting this idea so long as there is a social-safety net to help people who are struggling because of the inevitable boom and bust cycles capitalism creates. It feels quite different I imagine believing recessions are some natural or inevitable force we all have to accept like hurricanes if you or your family is suddenly in the eye of the storm and there is no assistance during the unemployment, hunger and homelessness that also inevitability occurs with those recessions. I imagine you think similarly, but I think it's important not to just talk in the abstract about such events. Real people get hurt during recessions. I remember seeing some of the struggling young people in the parks in New York during the 2011 Occupy Wall Street protests with signs saying, "Where's My Bailout?" It can't just be for the banks when the time comes.Hey!!!! Recessions are a part of life in our system. They come and they go. For whatever the reason the next recession is always somewhere in the future. But they are inevitable.
The above is excerpted from a current article in The Wall Street Journal, and was edited for brevity.UBS Group AG agreed to take over its longtime rival Credit Suisse Group AG for more than $3 billion, pushed into the biggest banking deal in years by regulators eager to halt a dangerous decline in confidence in the global banking system. The deal between the twin pillars of Swiss finance is the first megamerger of systemically important global banks since the 2008 financial crisis when institutions across the banking landscape were carved up and matched with rivals, often at the behest of regulators.
The Swiss government said it would provide more than $9 billion to backstop some losses that UBS may incur by taking over Credit Suisse. The Swiss National Bank also provided more than $100 billion of liquidity to UBS to help facilitate the deal.
Swiss authorities were under pressure to make the deal happen before Asian markets opened for the week. The urgency on the part of regulators was prompted by an increasingly dire outlook at Credit Suisse, according to one of the people familiar with the matter. The bank faced as much as $10 billion in customer outflows a day last week, this person said.
The sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank earlier this month prompted investors globally to scour for weak spots in the financial system. Credit Suisse was already first on many lists of troubled institutions, weakened by years of self-inflicted scandals and trading losses. Swiss officials, along with regulators in the U.S., U.K. and European Union, who all oversee parts of the bank, feared it would become insolvent this week if not dealt with, and they were concerned crumbling confidence could spread to other banks.
An end to Credit Suisse’s nearly 167-year run marks one of the most significant moments in the banking world since the last financial crisis. It also represents a new global dimension of damage from a banking storm started with the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank earlier this month.
Unlike Silicon Valley Bank, whose business was concentrated in a single geographic area and industry, Credit Suisse is a global player despite recent efforts to reduce its sprawl and curb riskier activities such as lending to hedge funds.
Credit Suisse had a half-trillion-dollar balance sheet and around 50,000 employees at the end of 2022, including more than 16,000 in Switzerland.
UBS has around 74,000 employees globally. It has a balance sheet roughly twice as large, at $1.1 trillion in total assets. After swallowing Credit Suisse, UBS’s balance sheet will rival Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank AG in asset size.
Before Collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, the Fed Spotted Big Problems
The bank was using an incorrect model as it assessed its own risks amid rising interest rates, and spent much of 2022 under a supervisory review.
Read that article too. - No - I’ll “pass” on banks. (Don’t ride roller-coasters either) ISTM Buffett has a modest amount in BAC. (2nd or 3rd largest holding after AAPL). Seems like a safer way to get some exposure.Yes just saw this! Is anyone considering nibbling on any of the banks? If so how are you doing so? Andrew Bary had a nice piece in Barron’s where he favored JPM, MS and GS… it’s a good read.
Company Symbol Uninsured deposits / Loans and HTM/ YTD %The Business Insider piece looks at "15 major banks" as of the end of 2022. Here too, Citigroup stands out. It must be nice to be TBTF.
domestic deposits total deposits change
(higher is riskier) (higher is riskier)
Bank of New York Mellon (BK) 96.5% 31.2% -0.1%
SVB Financial Group (SIVB) 93.9% 94.4% -53.9%
State Street (STT) 91.2% 40.1% -1.8%
Signature (SBNY) 89.7% 93.3% -39.2%
Northern Trust (NTRS) 83.1% 54.5% -3.1%
Citigroup (C) 77.0% 64.6% 4.3%
HSBC Holdings (HSBA) 72.5% 47.4% 11.9%
First Republic Bank (FRC) 67.7% 110.6% -69.1%
East West Bancorp (EWBC) 65.9% 91.1% -13.9%
Comerica (CMA) 62.5% 72.8% -36.6%
Financial institution Deposits not insured by the FDIC
Signature Bank 90%
SVB 88%
Citigroup 85%
First Republic 68%
JPMorgan 59%
BNY Mellon 56%
Citizens Financial 49%
KeyCorp 47%
PNC 46%
Truist 46%
M&T Bank 45%
Fifth Third 42%
Bank of America 33%
Goldman Sachs 33%
Huntington Bancshares 33%
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla