Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Amazon to announce largest layoffs in company history
    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/27/amazon-to-announce-sweeping-corporate-job-cuts-starting-tuesday.html
    The company plans to lay off as many as 30,000 staffers across its corporate workforce, according to Reuters, which first reported the news.
    Amazon declined to comment.
  • Why buy the S&P 500?
    My SIL has been buying 50/50 VOO/QQQ for years now. He can already retire.
    In the early 1990s, a good friend invested in ten individual stocks, putting about $3,000 into each. The rest of his monthly contributions went into the S&P 500.
    Nine of those stocks didn’t amount to much — but the tenth, Microsoft, grew into more than $1.5 million.
  • How at risk is this portfolio?
    Relative SD is more stable than SD.
    Relative SD = SDportfolio/SDbenchmark. I just use SP500 for benchmark.
    TestFol also provides rolling SDs, so you can see it overtime. But SDbenchmark also has similar variations, and that's why Relative SD becomes more stable.
    While PV doesn't have rolling SDs, it does have Drawdowns over the run periods (so does TestFol).
    In looking at PV simulation data by @msf, assuming equal holdings by the OP, Drawdown was about 2xSD, and SD was around 2.5. So, even in bad scenarios, the Drawdown may be in mid/high-single-digits. If one cannot tolerate that, then use money-market funds.
  • How Bad Is Finance’s Cockroach Problem? We Are About to Find Out.
    Following are excerpts from an opinion article in The New York Times.   (This should be a free link.)
    It was early last month when observers noticed ominous cracks in the facade of one of America’s most important financial markets. Tricolor, one of the largest used-car retailers in Texas and California, abruptly declared bankruptcy. Federal investigators are reportedly looking into whether the company committed fraud by promising the same collateral to multiple lenders.
    Shortly after Tricolor cratered, something similar happened to First Brands, a company primarily known for making car parts. Its investors discovered roughly $2 billion in loans not on its balance sheet. That’s when things started getting scary. Fifth Third, a regional bank, said it had lent Tricolor $200 million, nearly all of which it now expected to write off as a loss. Same at JPMorgan Chase, which reported it was out $170 million that it will presumably never see again. At Barclays the figure is nearly $150 million. They’ll survive the loss, but the incident cast into sharp focus a risk that had otherwise lurked in the shadows, growing year by year: a cascade of bankruptcies that triggers a widespread financial crisis.
    Tricolor and First Brands had also borrowed from a breed of nonbank financial firms known collectively as private credit, whose workings are much more opaque. Giving voice to a widespread sense that the losses had only just begun to pile up, Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase’s chief executive, warned, “When you see one cockroach, there are probably more.”
    The 2008 financial crisis occurred in part because banks and other financial institutions were offering too many mortgages to borrowers who couldn’t plausibly repay them. When enough bad loans began caving in at the same time, they sucked big banks and the rest of the economy into the sinkhole along with them.
    Banks today are subject to stricter regulations, which have largely functioned as intended, keeping banks from making as many risky loans. Filling the void has been private credit. Today, firms like Apollo, KKR and Blackstone that manage and invest huge pools of money have gotten into the business of making direct loans, and they’re doing so at staggering rates. Now an approximately $2 trillion market, it is a leading option for many companies and consumers alike.
    Private credit firms say they can offer better terms than banks because they are not reliant on depositors who can withdraw their money and flee. But these firms are broadly exempt from the post-crash regulations that were imposed on the banking industry, so they are more able to make the kind of risky loans that brought down the economy the last time around. And they’re not exempt from the damage when those loans go south.
    The problem is that often the funds they rely on are not their own. They’re drawn from the money that has been entrusted to them by insurance companies, pension funds and, soon, 401(k)s. As was the case in the run-up to the big crash, these potentially risky ventures may therefore be fueled with the money of ordinary people who have no idea how it’s being deployed.
    Another troubling similarity: These not-bank banks, also known as shadow banks, do a lot of what’s known as financial engineering. That means packaging up a whole grab bag of debts — loans to corporations, leases on A.I. data centers, bills from plastic-surgery patients, car loans, anything, really — which are then sliced up and sold as new kinds of investment vehicles.
    Because the private and public credit markets are so closely connected, cockroaches in one part of the house will always spread to the other. Lending to risky borrowers has been on the rise for years. It is inevitable that after a period of excess, cases of insufficient due diligence by lenders and indeed fraud will pop up in public and private credit markets alike.

  • The REAL Economy: 'Empty shelves, higher prices’- Americans tell cost of Trump’s tariffs

    https://www.axios.com/2025/10/19/turkey-prices-bird-flu-supply-thanksgiving-holiday?
    Wholesale Turkey Prices Are Up by a Staggering 40% This Thanksgiving
    POULTRY OFFERING
    U.S. turkey stocks have plummeted to a 40-year low amid bird flu outbreaks, driving up wholesale prices by almost half. The American Farm Bureau Federation reports that tighter production is putting a squeeze on the nation’s flock ahead of Thanksgiving. It said wholesale turkey prices are about 40 percent higher than last year. Data from the USDA shows that 514,000 birds have been affected by avian flu this month. In total, 2.2 million birds have died in the past year across 12 states.

    Maybe buy your turkeys a bit early this year?
  • How at risk is this portfolio?
    I have one account that I tell myself is a safe spot, but is it really?
    Equal amounts in the following funds.
    RPHIX
    CBLDX
    ICMUX
    RSIIX
    DHEAX
    NRDCX
    RCTIX
    SWVVX
    What is a safe spot? In 2022 many bond funds lost 5-12%
    EGRIX easily beat the funds above in the last several years
    Within stocks:
    QLEIX has better performance and a sharper ratio (risk/reward) than VOO/SPY in the last 3 years.
  • Case for a ‘Good Enough’ Portfolio
    Neither. There’s a huge gap between the two.
    When I retired, I already had enough — all I needed was a 6% annual return, indefinitely. I could have gone with a simple 50/50 portfolio, but why? That approach would have allowed my portfolio to drop 20–30% from peak to trough.
    Instead, I set clear goals:
    -Earn at least 6% annually.
    -Make money every single year.
    -Never lose more than 3% from any recent high.
    -Outperform a traditional 50/50 portfolio.
    -Achieve the best possible risk-adjusted returns.
    I’ve met and exceeded all of those goals.
    =============
    During the accumulation phase from 1995 to retirement on 2018, my stock portion beat the SP500, and my bond portion did too...and with better risk/adjusted performance.
  • AKRIX converted to AKRE ETF
    The Akre Focus Fund (AKRIX) officially converted to the Akre Focus ETF (ticker: AKRE) on October 27, 2025. This conversion from a mutual fund to an ETF is expected to make the investment more tax-efficient and cost-effective for shareholders
  • Verdad - The Rise of Alternatives (In US Public Pension Funds)
    https://mailchi.mp/verdadcap/the-rise-of-alternatives-k5spt8qr6t
    "US public pensions have made a dramatic change to their asset allocations over the past decade. Allocators at these pension funds took investments in alternatives—private equity, real estate, and hedge funds—from 14% of their risky investments in 2001 to 39% by 2021."
    "A group of Stanford and Harvard academics is out with a fascinating paper making the case that this shift was not the result of shifts in realized performance, liquidity needs, or macroeconomic fundamentals. Rather, argue Stanford’s Juliane Begenau and Pauline Lang and Harvard’s Emil Siriwardane, the driver was a change in the beliefs of the pension funds’ investment consultants."
  • Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio converted into an ETF
    https://www.lazard.com/news-announcements/lazard-brings-decades-of-emerging-markets-leadership-to-the-etf-market-with-emkt/
    NEW YORK, October 27, 2025 – Lazard Asset Management (“LAM”) today announced the successful conversion of the Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio into the Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund ETF (NYSE: EMKT). The actively managed ETF offers investors streamlined access to Lazard’s long-standing leadership in emerging markets investing through a high-conviction portfolio...
    https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/874964/000093041325002049/c113074_497-ixbrl.htm
  • Mr. President, Tear Down These Economic Distortions!
    Project 2025 and Russ Voight wants to take the country back to 1926, and the policy reflects that.
    More like 1896 methinks.
  • Why buy the S&P 500?
    Only fortunate because I know it would drive me crazy obsessing over every detail all the time. So I'm not as crazy as I could be. :-D
    I bought SMH for the taxable in February 2024 when some poster here was talking about chips. So I put a few bucks down. And zowie! I already had TDIV, FSCSX, and CSGZX.
    So it keeps me comfortable owning my old fogies like DODGX, SEQUX, VEIRX, FSMEX, and POSKX; plus the fliers on FMIMX, GLFOX, RWJ, VSMIX, etc.
    There are some duds mixed in there too. I'll be rearranging those deck chairs overboard in the near future.
    If you already have tech, why buy the rest of the S&P 500 willy nilly when you could focus on SPHQ or SPGP?
  • How at risk is this portfolio?
    @msf assumed equal allocations. But based on SD indicated, under the new M* classification, it's conservative-allocation, and within that, at the lower end of the 15-30% equity allocation.
    So, the question to OP: What's worrying YOU?
  • Mr. President, Tear Down These Economic Distortions!
    Project 2025 and Russ Voight wants to take the country back to 1926, and the policy reflects that.
  • How at risk is this portfolio?
    That's what I was in the process of doing. (I assume SWVVX should be SWVXX; for PV I substituted CASH.)
    Forward looking (simulation) rather than retrospective. NRDCX is too new to include so I dropped it from the simulation. I assumed this was taxable account, mid-range (22%) tax rate, no withdrawals. It does okay but not surprisingly doesn't quite keep up with inflation.
    PV simulation
    RPHIX has a 0.5 correlation coefficient with cash (R² around 0.25). Everything else hardly correlates at all with cash, though they have correlation coefficients pairwise around 3/4 (R² around 1/2).
    There's one obvious risk factor that doesn't show up in the numbers - management risk. A majority of these funds (excluding the MMF) are managed by David Sherman. While he's an outstanding manager, if he makes a misjudgment, that could propagate through all his fund to varying degrees. In addition, a common manager aggravates succession risk - all the Riverpark/CrossingBridge funds might need to change managers at the same time. (They may already have multiple managers which can mitigate but not remove this risk.)
  • How at risk is this portfolio?
    Enter it in Portfolio Visualizer (PV) or Stock Rover (SR), find portfolio SD and compare with SP500 SD. Relative SD or effective-equity will provide you with an idea of its market exposure.
  • News report from BBG. Canada's trade strategy
    I keep having visions of a 95-yr old orange blob still lounging around in the WH while American citizens, a quarter of which are now homeless and hungry, keep sending in the tax money to fund the DeUnited Sovereign Wealth Fund OR ELSE. (Give me the OR ELSE!)
    They won't be hungry, they'll be sustained on TRUMPO, the officially-branded American beverage of choice.
    (if you've seen 'Idiocracy' you'll get the reference)
  • ➩ ➩ ➩ 11/18:  MFO site: Balky / Errors / Unresponsive
    5:24AM Pacific. What can I say? Errors, blank pages, slow loads.
  • News report from BBG. Canada's trade strategy
    I keep having visions of a 95-yr old orange blob still lounging around in the WH while American citizens, a quarter of which are now homeless and hungry, keep sending in the tax money to fund the DeUnited Sovereign Wealth Fund OR ELSE. (Give me the OR ELSE!)