Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • TIPS FUNDS/ETF’s,,,,,,, has 2022 proven them losers?
    I have written on TIPS earlier for MFO in the Feb issue. Here is the link:
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/2022/02/thoughts-on-inflation-protection/
    The 1st tool for inflation protection and the easiest one is Series I bonds. Each American tax payer can buy it for 10K online and 5k in paper through Tax refunds. That is the easy part because you can never lose mark to market money in that product. One doesn't even have deflation risk (I know, an odd think to think about right now) in Series I bonds. You are always protected at a zero inflation floor and get paid more than that if CPI is higher.
    But what should we do AFTER I bonds, if anything.
    One can always leave money in cash. Cash is always going to protect the notional value, provided, the 8-9% inflation we have witnessed in the last 12 months does not bother the person.
    It's understandable if people look for protection against inflation. When you've satiated your I bond capacity and don't want to leave in cash, what are the other tools available.
    1. TIPS
    2. Commodities?
    3. Real Estate?
    4. Thoughtfully managed short-end taxable mutual funds?
    There are no guaranteed answers but TIPS have a 100% correlation to CPI-U. Do remember that the calculation of CPI in the TIPS accruals is lagged by 3 months.
    Complete details on how TIPS work can be seen in this video I produced a few years back:

    A great website on TIPS is maintained by David Enna: tipswatch.com
    I can tell you why I continue to hold short-dated TIPS.
    YTD, the VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Infl-Prot Secs ETF) is down 1.53% year to date. How should I process that information given the high CPI we have witnessed thus far.
    YTD, the price return of VTIP has been -3.8% and the total return has been -1.5%.
    This means, TIP owners have been paid 2.5% in "interest" from CPI. But because of lagged use of CPI and not enough time gone by, this 2.5% is less than 6-7-8-or-9% that might be accrued due to CPI increases when the year is done. Not all of the interest will accrue right away but it will all make its way through the TIPS eventually.
    Another question to ask is: what would I have held instead that is Bond like?
    1. TIP (7.5 year duration) -8.9% ytd
    2. LTPZ (20year duration) - 26% ytd
    3. Short Term Treasuries -3.5% ytd
    4. Intermediate Term Treasuries -7.7% ytd
    5. Long Term Treasuries - 22% ytd
    What would have been US Government paper and "safer"? Maybe 3 month T-bills would have been fine. And that's the same as cash.
    Once an investor goes outside of the TIPS universe for inflation protection, one opens up a can of unknowns.
    Equity REITS -20%,
    Commodities and Commodity stocks did great for a while and recently had a 30-50% correction based on what one owned.
    Volatility matters for meeting goals. VTIP was the cleanest among the dirty shirts.
    If absolute returns is your goal, and it's a good one, in the Fixed Income Taxable bond universe, RiverPark Short Term High Yield Institutional, RPHIX, is UP on the year. David Sherman's been phenomenal in keeping the fund above the surface in 2022.
    FPA New Income, apparently Open, but I cant buy it because it shows up Closed due to Schwab not having updated their database, is also long a lot of Floating rate bonds that will help the fund in the future.
    I continue to be long VTIP because I believe that even if Fed raising rates further has an impact on Duration and Real Yields, and it hurts VTIP, eventually you get paid through CPI as long as inflation remains sticky. And if inflation comes down, the portfolio would benefit from OTHER assets. *unless we are in stagflation, in which case, God help*
    Hope this was helpful.
  • VBNK. VersaBank, London, Ontario
    Not sure what this means: "...an Office Of The Comptroller-chartered bank." I thought banks in the US were federally or State-chartered? Anyhow, VBNK is taking over Stearns Bank, an OCC-chartered bank, in a little burg in Minnesota. Near St. Cloud, I think it said. Who can tell me what that means, exactly? An "OCC-chartered bank?" Thanks.
    https://www.chartmill.com/stock/quote/VBNK/analyst-ratings
    https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/VBNK
    https://www.morningstar.com/news/pr-newswire/20220614to87936/versabank-to-acquire-occ-chartered-national-us-bank-providing-platform-for-growth-in-the-united-states
    https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/banks/nasdaq-vbnk/versabank
  • Amazing / TROW down nearly 40% YTD
    As TROW share price potentially slides further, pay attention to it's dividend payout.
    At today share price ($113.51) it is paying a dividend of (4.14%). If they are able to maintain their dividend payout it seems like a good dynamic...income + potential capital appreciation.
    So far their ownership in Rivian has not paid off. Anyone have any idea what else TROW "owns"?
    t-rowe-price-stake-in-rivan-worth-10-billion
    On the side of who own's TROW...many big Financials:
    image
  • Amazing / TROW down nearly 40% YTD
    $113.68 this morning. Off about 2%.
    TROW gained nearly 40% in 2021 and around 20% the preceding year. So some “give back” here. But, that must have been a horrific ride down this year for anyone holding an appreciable amount!
    Have started tracking this turkey.
  • Minimum and Maximum
    I am on target... I use Merriman's 60/40 index portfolio as a benchmark. Presently doing about 3% better than it has.
    @Bobpa +1
  • Amazing / TROW down nearly 40% YTD
    All asset-managers are down sharply since early-November 2021 peak. May be TROW is among the worst because it is more stocks and OEFs oriented (it is trying to diversify and doing other restructuring) - others are more diversified.
    https://stockcharts.com/h-perf/ui?s=TROW&compare=BEN,BLK,JHG,IVZ&id=
  • Amazing / TROW down nearly 40% YTD
    I currently own 2 shares of TROW with a cost basis of $115. It's a tiny amount, but it helps me track the stock better. If it goes down 20%, I'd probably buy 5 or 10 more shares,LOL!!
  • Dividend after purchase of company stock
    Not only that, but if the stock is sold within 61 days of purchase, that dividend will be taxed as ordinary income.
    https://www.fidelity.com/tax-information/tax-topics/qualified-dividends
  • Minimum and Maximum
    Thanks for starting this thread. I DO own PRWCX. I had been following traditional advice about a 60/40 portfolio in retirement, reducing equities, and growing my bonds. Then came the party after fed stimulus, when covid struck. Then came the war in Ukraine. Then came supply chain issues. A can of hash here costs $5.00, last time I looked. Then came souped-up inflation and Central Banks raising rates. And the market downturn.
    Because I am me, I responded to it all late and inadequately--- as ever.
    I bought some funds just as they were turning DOWN, earlier in the year. I'm down to 20% bonds, and my one bond fund is a TRP HY animal, now. TUHYX. I'm up to 73% stocks. PRWCX = 36.73% of total today.. (Hank says he's be adding to it now, in these current circumstances. I just did add a couple of thousand dollars to it, about a month ago. I would not dare to do that with any other fund or stock, letting it get SO big.)
    Same goes for my still rather small stake in single stocks. I just started to grow THAT garden as the Market turned south. But as I have been able, I've been adding, given depressed equity prices these days. I keep my eye on a watchlist. But my retirement IRA and my brokerage account are like swimming pools with a very tall wall between them. If I take too much from the former in order to give to the latter, I'll owe taxes I don't want to pay. i live in the ZERO bracket these days. Still have a couple of years before RMDs begin.
    The common wisdom is to put a limit of 20% on any single holding. That's what I'd heard. I blew THAT one out of the water. After PRWCX, my other stuff, in order of size is:
    PRISX. 14.9% of total.
    PRNEX. 11.45%
    TUHYX. 10.7%
    TRAMX. 7.4%
    PRFDX. 5.53%
    BRUFX. 5.36%
    BHB. 3.54%
    ET. 2.94%
    RGR. 1.45%
    I'm down significantly YTD, but I'm in good company. I don't do shorts, don't invest in inverse, 3X upside-down bear funds. I'm waiting this out. When a recession shows itself, The Fed will cry "uncle," I bet. With 34% of my total in financials around the world, I'll be happier than a pig in shit when rates come down.
    That was more than @Bobpa and everyone else needed to know. Sorry. Great question, though.
  • Dividend after purchase of company stock
    For instance if I buy the stock of a company on July11th, will I get the dividend with Ex-Dividend Date Jul 14, 2022.
    Thanks, ron
  • “Everything we deal with is significantly cheaper than it was six - 12 months ago.” - Howard Marks
    Thank you BaluBalu
    Could be long summer, maybe more pains /significant downturns another 15% -25% haircut ahead for 3-6 more months know.
    Hope we maybe be little better by late fall /winter 2022 and recovery formation in spring
    Buffett- nobody in Wallstreet know!!
  • Wall Street Week
    The show (7/8) was mostly about private equity investing (first one-third of show). Just one gal being interviewed by moderator. That was followed by 5-10 minutes of Larry Summers, who I don’t think said anything new. The remainder of show was devoted to last week’s market summary plus a look at key upcoming events*. A little disappointed in this one to tell the truth.
    *Upcoming events this week include release of some earnings numbers - including some big tech names. There’s been some rumbling in the press that they may disappoint and rattle the markets. Stay tuned.
  • Wall Street Week
    I can watch the full show as part of my Comcast service. The show airs for my service a few times over the weekend, the last time being 1-2PM PST Sunday. I went to the WSW site last night (by googling) for the first time in response to your post - I did not notice (tired eyes!) the hyperlink (blue font) in your original post.
  • I Bond Interest?
    Treasury Direct (TD) has only a virtual keyboard for password entry and you cannot get rid of it. Unusually, the TD passwords are not case-sensitive (most typically are, while usernames are not). TD is just an older and clunky website.
    For years I cursed the virtual keyboard until I discovered that my password manager (1Password) will fill in the password and bypass the keyboard on my desktop Mac.
  • Minimum and Maximum
    There are no hard and fast rules for minimum and maximum fund positions.
    I agree with much of the info stated in the prior posts.
    It's more important to focus on risk and diversification.
    An investor can achieve good results owning only a target-date fund or a global allocation fund.
    I think minimum fund exposure should be ≥ 5% since smaller positions will not be impactful.
    Having too many funds often leads to "diworsification".
    An individual investor shouldn't need to hold more than 12 - 15 funds in most circumstances.
    Less is often more...
    +1
    One “hidden danger”, I suspect, of owning only 1 or 2 funds is that it might be easy for some (not particularly well informed) investors to to get into a perpetual habit of selling one or both of those after an extended period of underperformance (umm … maybe after 6-12 months) and moving into “better performing” funds. While that might seem like a good idea at the moment, longer term it’s very detrimental to returns, as all funds will have both hot streaks and cooler ones.
    The above problem is not confined to just 1 and 2 fund portfolios. But it’s probably easier to become unnerved / stressed out over a holding when it’s 50% of your assets than when it’s 5-10%..
  • Minimum and Maximum
    The rule of thumb of 4-5% per holding is for individual stocks.
    Most funds are already diversified but some are not. Unusually, the LC-growth index has become nondiversified (see 1st link below). Also, active funds may be concentrated in some areas/sectors by their managers. Sector funds are obviously concentrated in respective sectors. Fund-of-funds (including target-date funds, robo-advisor funds, 529 funds, etc) are quite diversified. So, considerations for funds are a bit different.
    Formal definition of a diversified fund is that 75% of the should have individual holdings within 5% (see 2nd link). This old definition was to prevent funds as being used to cash pools or as controlling entities, but now is also being used for funds that purposely keep over 5% position totals under 25% of the portfolio. Despite such efforts, the number of nondiversified funds is increasing.
    https://www.mutualfundobserver.com/discuss/discussion/59731/many-lc-growth-funds-are-nondiversified#latest
    https://ybbpersonalfinance.proboards.com/thread/307/diversified-nondiversified-funds