Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Comments

  • As usual, he will use the same tactics of running out the clock if he runs in 2024. If the claimant has physical evidence, Trump’s DNA on her clothing, a criminal case would be file and he cannot escape. Having to testify is humiliating at least.
  • "Trump’s DNA on her clothing"... wait, wasn't that Clinton?
  • Old_Joe said:

    "Trump’s DNA on her clothing"... wait, wasn't that Clinton?

    That cigar of his surely tasted good, though...

  • How gross!!!:)
  • edited October 2022
    I stated “if” in my statement. Otherwise, the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Don’t know much about the allegation other than what is in the news. Think the rape case is closed since it was in the 90’s, unless she has physical evidence.

    The deposition is relating to a defamation lawsuit on Trump. He will just take the fifth…
  • Sadly, I think you're correct, @sven.
Sign In or Register to comment.