Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
Support MFO
Donate through PayPal
Why The Roaring 2020's Will Continue To Roar- Ed Yardeni Interview
In 2020, influential strategist Ed Yardeni predicted the economy & markets were entering a “Roaring 2020s” decade. So far, he’s proven the naysayers wrong. He explains why the economy should continue to expand and the markets to advance in 2026 and beyond.
since yardeni never makes unambiguous prospective recession\depression calls, i have have a hard time attributing his 'buy major index' strategy to much other than using the trend factor.
I promise to view the video later. However, suspense is intense! The market will continue to roar until when? Forever and ever? Or maybe until after the mid-term elections? Or what?
Add: Yardeni is cited in this week's Barron's as making that "roaring market" call with specificity only through 2026. With only a 1 year window I don't think I'll mortgage my home and throw it all into stocks.
My take on all of this - "Newton's first law states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state ..."
Siegel basically has 2 long term opinions 1) Mr. Siegel is stocks perma bull. He has 2 main predictions annually: stocks will make money next year. 2) Stocks will make more than bonds.
The above is not a brain surgery, just common sense BUT NOTHING MUCH because 1) The SP500 was up over 80% in the last 40 years. He has no clue what % the SP500 will go up or what years will go down. Generic 10% range predictions don't mean much 2) Of course, stocks will make more than bonds, they have that for decades, especially when the 10 year treasury went to 0.5% in 2020...duh.
Stocks: As expected, Siegel was wrong every down year 1) 03/2001 (link): about stocks "they are probably a better bet now than they were a year ago. You can buy them at cheaper prices.” FD: from 03/2001 to 09/2002, which is about 1.5 years, the SP500 lost over 22%, see (link) 2) 2008 (link) "I think the stock market will have another winning year in 2008." FD: The SP500 fell more than 50% and finish 2008 at -37%. 3) 2018 (link): U.S. equities will end the year with gains of as much as 10%. FD: the SP500 was negative at -4.5%. 4) 2019(link) "Jeremy Siegel says stocks could rally between 5 and 15 percent in the new year." FD: the SP500 made 31.5% more than double of what Siegel predicted.
Some amateur investors believe they are far more knowledgeable than experts like Jeremy Siegel. These self-aggrandizing individuals should attempt to write a book as influential as Stocks for the Long Run. Perhaps this book would be named Bonds for Brief Periods?
Hindsight bias, also known as the "'I knew it all along'" phenomenon or creeping determinism, is a cognitive bias where people perceive past events as being more predictable than they actually were before the event took place
“Hind end bias”, also known as FD syndrome, is when less successful people spend much time judging more successful people. Often associated with lame rationalizations over ostensibly “ having enough”, to explain their own shortfalls.
Named after Farken Dumass, a rando who prowled investment websites for decades, and was often the subject of much derision. It came to be recognized as a subset of narcissistic personality disorder.
Comments
since yardeni never makes unambiguous prospective recession\depression calls, i have have a hard time attributing his 'buy major index' strategy to much other than using the trend factor.
Until the market broadens out to the other 493 stocks, what keeps the Mag 7 stocks going in 2026?
Edit:. The circular investment among the AI companies is worrisome. Is Oracle’s earning report this week a sign of something big to come ? .
Add: Yardeni is cited in this week's Barron's as making that "roaring market" call with specificity only through 2026. With only a 1 year window I don't think I'll mortgage my home and throw it all into stocks.
My take on all of this - "Newton's first law states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state ..."
Often stated as ...
"Don't buck the trend"
"Go with the flow"
"Don't fight the market"
"Don't fight the Fed"
"The trend is your friend"
"Past is prologue"
"Take the path of least resistance"
"It's hard to stop a moving locomotive"
"Up Up and Away (in my beautiful balloon)"
Here are a few more...
"The Market Climbs a Wall Of Worry" and six more:
https://schwab.com/learn/story/wall-street-jargon-7-market-cliches
JPMorgan's take on this recent "wall of worry":
https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/eur/en/insights/markets-and-investing/tmt/wall-of-worry-markets-are-climbing-it-anyway
Siegel basically has 2 long term opinions
1) Mr. Siegel is stocks perma bull. He has 2 main predictions annually: stocks will make money next year.
2) Stocks will make more than bonds.
The above is not a brain surgery, just common sense BUT NOTHING MUCH because
1) The SP500 was up over 80% in the last 40 years. He has no clue what % the SP500 will go up or what years will go down. Generic 10% range predictions don't mean much
2) Of course, stocks will make more than bonds, they have that for decades, especially when the 10 year treasury went to 0.5% in 2020...duh.
Stocks:
As expected, Siegel was wrong every down year
1) 03/2001 (link): about stocks "they are probably a better bet now than they were a year ago. You can buy them at cheaper prices.” FD: from 03/2001 to 09/2002, which is about 1.5 years, the SP500 lost over 22%, see (link)
2) 2008 (link) "I think the stock market will have another winning year in 2008." FD: The SP500 fell more than 50% and finish 2008 at -37%.
3) 2018 (link): U.S. equities will end the year with gains of as much as 10%. FD: the SP500 was negative at -4.5%.
4) 2019(link) "Jeremy Siegel says stocks could rally between 5 and 15 percent in the new year." FD: the SP500 made 31.5% more than double of what Siegel predicted.
These self-aggrandizing individuals should attempt to write a book as influential as Stocks for the Long Run.
Perhaps this book would be named Bonds for Brief Periods?
Named after Farken Dumass, a rando who prowled investment websites for decades, and was often the subject of much derision. It came to be recognized as a subset of narcissistic personality disorder.