Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Trump Prosecutors vs Fed Chair Powell... GOP Senator Tillis will oppose Powell's replacement

edited January 11 in Other Investing
Following are excerpts from a current report in The New York Times:

The investigation, which centers on renovations of the Federal Reserve’s headquarters in Washington, signals an escalation in the long-running clash between President Trump and the chair.
The U.S. attorney’s office in the District of Columbia has opened a criminal investigation into Jerome H. Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, over the central bank’s renovation of its Washington headquarters and whether Mr. Powell lied to Congress about the scope of the project, according to officials briefed on the situation. The inquiry, which includes an analysis of Mr. Powell’s public statements and an examination of spending records, was approved in November by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of President Trump who was appointed to run the office last year, the officials said.

The investigation escalates Mr. Trump’s long-running feud with Mr. Powell, whom the president has continually attacked for resisting his demands to slash interest rates significantly. The president has threatened to fire the Fed chair and raised the prospect of a lawsuit against him related to the $2.5 billion renovation, citing “incompetence.”

AN ESCALATING FIGHT


Mr. Trump told The New York Times in an interview last week that he had decided on who he wants to replace Mr. Powell as Fed chair. He is expected to soon announce his decision. Kevin A. Hassett, Mr. Trump’s top economic adviser, is a front-runner for the top job. While Mr. Powell’s term as chair ends in May, his term as a governor runs through January 2028.

In a rare video message released by the Fed on Sunday, Mr. Powell described the investigation as “unprecedented” and questioned the motivation for the move, even as he affirmed that he carried out his duties as chair “without political fear or favor.” “This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings,” he said. “It is not about Congress’s oversight role; the Fed through testimony and other public disclosures made every effort to keep Congress informed about the renovation project. Those are pretexts.”

He warned that the investigation signaled a broader battle over the Fed’s independence. “The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the president,” he added. “This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions — or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.”

A spokesman for Attorney General Pam Bondi did not comment on the investigation but said Ms. Bondi had “instructed her U.S. attorneys to prioritize investing any abuses of taxpayer dollars.” The U.S. attorney’s investigation into Mr. Powell underscores Mr. Trump’s larger clash with the Fed. Other broadsides have included an effort to oust Lisa D. Cook, a governor at the central bank whom Mr. Trump tried to fire over allegations of mortgage fraud. Presidents are able to remove officials at the Fed only for “cause,” which has typically meant malfeasance or a dereliction of duty. The Supreme Court will hear arguments for Ms. Cook’s case on Jan. 21.

Congress granted the Fed the authority to set interest rates free of meddling from presidents, whose political fortunes are often tethered to how the economy is faring. Rather, lawmakers stipulated that the central bank should pursue low, stable inflation and a healthy labor market. Mr. Powell said on Sunday that the Justice Department had served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas. Prosecutors in Ms. Pirro’s office have contacted Mr. Powell’s staff multiple times to request documents about the renovation project, according to an official with knowledge of the investigation who discussed an open inquiry on the condition of anonymity.

Starting an investigation is one thing, presenting sufficient evidence to secure an indictment from a federal grand jury — or making it stick — is another. Indictments against two of Mr. Trump’s top targets, the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey and Letitia James, the New York attorney general, were thrown out in November by a federal judge. An investigation into Senator Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California, has yet to yield enough evidence to present to a grand jury.

The renovations at the center of the investigation into Mr. Powell broke ground in 2022 and are set to be completed in 2027. They are estimated to be about $700 million over budget. The project involves expanding and modernizing the Marriner S. Eccles Building and another building on Constitution Avenue, which date to the 1930s. The Fed has said that neither of those buildings has been “comprehensively renovated” since their construction nearly 100 years ago, suggesting they were in need of a significant overhaul. Part of the project includes removing asbestos and lead contamination as well as making the facilities compliant with laws related to accessibility for people with disabilities.

In explaining the cost overruns, the central bank cited expenses tied to materials, equipment and labor as well as unforeseen circumstances, such as more asbestos than anticipated and soil contamination.

Comment:   Well, it's open warfare now. Little infantile bully Trump vs the Fed. I guess that he woke up on the wrong side of the bed today.

«1

Comments

  • edited January 11
    Just when you wondered if that putrid POS couldn't go any lower or smell worse.
    Another day, another distraction.
  • Following are excerpts from a current report in The Guardian:

    Fed chair hits back, accusing DoJ of threatening criminal charges because central bank defied Trump’s demands
    The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, a significant escalation in Donald Trump’s extraordinary attack on the US central bank.

    In a blistering statement on Sunday, Powell argued he had been threatened with criminal charges because the Fed had set interest rates “based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President”.

    Trump has repeatedly blasted the Powell and the Fed for declining to bow to his demand for rapid rate cuts.

    Powell said the Department of Justice had served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas on Friday, threatening a criminal indictment related to his testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June, regarding renovations to the Fed’s historic office buildings in Washington DC.

    Allies of Trump spent months last year accusing the Fed of mishandling the multibillion-dollar renovations. Trump had repeatedly threatened legal action.

    In a statement on Sunday evening, Powell said: “This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.”

    “I have served at the Federal Reserve under four administrations, Republicans and Democrats alike. In every case, I have carried out my duties without political fear or favor, focused solely on our mandate of price stability and maximum employment.

    “Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. I will continue to do the job the Senate confirmed me to do, with integrity and a commitment to serving the American people.”

    The White House and the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
  • What is the regime mostly likely to mess up in the next ten days ? Invade Greenland? Attack Iran ? Attack another American city? Indict someone who stands up to him? Isn’t great living in interesting times?
  • Diversion attempt #278. Throw it out there and see if anything sticks.

    Reeks of desperation.
  • The Cretin-in-Chief will stop at nothing to divert attention from Epstein.

    image
  • But but but the GQP/MAGA told us that weaponizing the government was wrong, bad, and shouldn't happen.....

    Yet another distraction from his LATEST failure/fiasco/f*ck-up
  • Kudos to JPOW for calling out the cowards....
    In a blistering statement on Sunday, Powell argued he had been threatened with criminal charges because the Fed had set interest rates “based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President”
  • edited January 11
    JD_co said:

    Kudos to JPOW for calling out the cowards....

    In a blistering statement on Sunday, Powell argued he had been threatened with criminal charges
    because the Fed had set interest rates “based on our best assessment of what will serve the public,
    rather than following the preferences of the President”
    Yes, I'm pleased that Federal Reserve Chair Powell presented the facts calmly and clearly.
  • edited January 11
    Following are excerpts from a current report by the BBC:

    US justice department opens criminal probe into Fed chair Jerome Powell
    Federal prosecutors have opened a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, he said on Sunday.

    In a video announcing the probe, Powell said the US justice department served the agency with subpoenas and threatened a criminal indictment over testimony he gave to a Senate committee about renovations to Federal Reserve buildings.

    He called the probe "unprecedented" and said he believed it was opened due to him drawing President Donald Trump's ire over refusing to lower interest rates despite repeated public pressure from the president.

    The Fed chair is the latest to come at odds with Trump and then face criminal investigation by the US justice department.

    "This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions, or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation," Powell said.

    "I have deep respect for the rule of law and for accountability in our democracy. No one, certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve is above the law, but this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure," he went on to say.

    Powell has repeatedly come under fire from Trump for not cutting interest rates as quickly as the president have liked. In the second half of 2025, the Fed cut interest rates three times.

    North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican who is a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said he would oppose the nomination of Powell's replacement by Trump, and any other Fed Board nominee, "until this legal matter is fully resolved".

    "If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump Administration are actively pushing to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none," Tillis said in a statement.

    "It is now the independence and credibility of the Department of Justice that are in question," the senator said.


    The investigation will be overseen by the US Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, according to the New York Times, which first reported the probe.

    Comment:   Well, hello Senator Tillis! Nice to see you again... been taking a very long nap, have you?

    Note- text emphasis in BBC report was added.


    image

    image
  • edited January 12
    "If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump Administration are actively pushing
    to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none," Tillis said in a statement.


    There should not have been any doubt for anyone paying attention to these events.

    "It is now the independence and credibility of the Department of Justice that are in question," the senator said.

    The credibility of the Department of Justice collapsed months ago.
    After the current administration's demise, it will take arduous work to re-establish the DOJ's credibility.
  • Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. And Orange Donny? A childish, self-absorbed boor.
  • Repugnant senators always chicken out. It’s as predictable as waking up to bad regime news every morning. At this point what do you check first each weekday morning? The market?Bad regime news or is he d___ y__?
  • Powell should have hired trades people from Craigs List. I hired cousin Eddie and saved 35%. I mean the slope was 2% sloped into house instead of 3% away. That’s not a big deal is it?

    The Federal Reserve Buildings aren’t historically protected buildings are they?
  • edited January 12
    "The Federal Reserve Buildings aren’t historically protected buildings are they?"

    Yes, these buildings are protected.
    Another historic building was partially demolished recently without a formal review process.
    I can only assume the review process is overly "bureaucratic" and inconvenient to implement.
    https://bsky.app/profile/gtconway.bsky.social/post/3mc73ftktkj2w
  • edited January 12
    larryB said:

    Repugnant senators always chicken out. It’s as predictable as waking up to bad regime news every morning. At this point what do you check first each weekday morning? The market?Bad regime news or is he d___ y__?

    It's even easier to make a loud, outspoken stand when you're not running for election, too....
  • Forget elected officials. How can so many Americans be so sick. This is actually happening by request of (almost?) half the American people.
  • Anna said:

    Forget elected officials. How can so many Americans be so sick. This is actually happening by request of (almost?) half the American people.

    I really think the majority of those who voted for this had no idea what they were REALLY getting into. They wanted to support the reality-television spectacle that Donnie provides them since he found a way to tap into and exploit their discontent for his gain. Couple that with a lot of folks not understanding how government (or tariffs, or the job market, or immigration) really works in this country, and it's a recipe for disaster. To wit: it's like how people in his first term were all rabidly against 'Obamacare' but begged Congress not to touch their 'Affordable Care' insurance --- WHICH WAS THE SAME THING. They're conditioned to think things like 'socialism' are bad and evil, but nobody tells them that's what funds Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, food stamps, etc, etc.

    But Anna's right -- Donnie is only the figurehead; it's his enablers in Congress, and those who keep electing them that's the bigger problem. But the system indeed is fundamentally rigged (to use Donnie's favorite term) -- whether it's gerrymandered districts (both parties do this) to ensure it's hard or impossible for another party to win the district, an Electoral Collage setup that limits which states are 'important' for a presidential election, or a Senate that gives overwhelming power to smaller states with fewer people, etc.

    But the real problem is, no government, of either party, is going to initiate reforms that allowed it to gain (or retain) power ... so the cycle goes on and on, and I remain cynical.






  • Meanwhile 1% of the Epstein files have been released. The amount of intentional distraction to push that item to the back pages -- wow!
  • edited January 12
    rforno said:

    Anna said:

    Forget elected officials. How can so many Americans be so sick. This is actually happening by request of (almost?) half the American people.

    I really think the majority of those who voted for this had no idea what they were REALLY getting into. They wanted to support the reality-television spectacle that Donnie provides them since he found a way to tap into and exploit their discontent for his gain. fewer people, etc. ...
    I agree with all of your points 100%.

    Still this means that these are a large number of very stupid people. Uninformed, malformed, poorly educated, a complete failure to understand. They don't get The Constitution, Separation of Powers, checks and balances, civics in general. They do not understand history.

    The only thing that will ever regain even a modicum of respect for this nation, would be a complete rejection of this in 2026 and beyond. Followed by, real, serious prosecutions for people that have committed real, serious crimes.

    it is probably not going to happen. Hence, all of our cynicism.

  • Hatred can make people irrational. Hatred and anger can be funneled in the wrong direction - and Trump has done this extremely well.

    The MAGA 40% are so angry at the world that losing their own health benefits and their meager retirement benefits takes a back seat. Lower their standard of living? Meh. The hatred simply rules all.

    It's chilling in that this kind of manipulation is difficult to correct/unwind. Thus the cult-like atmosphere in certain parts of the US. Very sticky and very destructive.
  • It is sick, nevertheless, that the most privileged society ever known is angry especially when the major source of their problems, both personal and public, is of their own making.
  • edited January 12
    @Anna

    I wrote a much longer post, saying the exact same thing. And inadvertently deleted it. They are people incapable of owning their failures, so they blame!

    Hatred does lead to irrationality. And irrationality is first cousin to stupidity.
  • "And inadvertently deleted it."

    Man, I just hate it when I do that. And the one that "got away" was always, at least as I remember, the best one ever.  :(
  • This morning, I thought the world was coming to an end.

    (link1)
    "US stock market crashes today: Why Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq down today? Here’s why fears over the Federal Reserve triggered a market pullback"

    (link2)
    "Dow Jones Futures Fall With Fed Chief Powell Under Criminal Probe"

    At close: the SP500 made another high.
    Fake news again?

  • Following are excerpts from a current essay in The New York Times:

    Trump’s Attack on the Fed Is Already Backfiring
    On Sunday evening, news broke that the Trump administration was targeting Jerome Powell — the Federal Reserve chair, whom President Trump has been raging about for months — with a highly dubious criminal investigation into supposed financial improprieties. Usually reserved in his public statements, Mr. Powell posted a video bluntly calling the allegations a dishonest attempt at revenge for the Fed’s refusal to simply follow the president’s wishes.

    The episode is a shocking violation of the central bank’s historical independence, one that puts the United States in league with authoritarian nations careening toward financial ruin. On Monday, markets reacted with something along the lines of “meh”: The dollar and stock prices edged down, while gold prices and interest rates rose.

    Mr. Trump’s attack on the Fed is a breathtaking departure from precedent, a dangerous and scary power grab, but it’s already backfiring. If anything, this latest episode has weakened his ability to bend the institution to his will, at least in the short run. It definitely increases the chance that Mr. Powell, whose term as chair ends in May, but whose appointment as a board member does not, will remain at the Fed longer than he might otherwise have. It will also raise the hurdle for whoever Mr. Trump nominates as the next Fed chair. And it will make other members of that body a lot less likely to go along with the president’s agenda.

    As recently as November 2024, Mr. Powell was saying as little as possible, replying simply “no” when asked whether he would resign if requested to do so by Mr. Trump. That restraint is what made the video he released on Sunday night so powerful. This is not a man looking to become a resistance hero.

    When Mr. Powell’s term as chair ends in May, he could stay on as a governor — and one of 12 voters on monetary policy — through January 2028. With threats intensifying, the case for his continued presence as a quiet but firm defender of Fed independence grows only stronger.

    Mr. Trump has made it harder for his nominee as the next Fed chair to be confirmed. Almost immediately after news of the criminal investigation broke, Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican member of the Banking Committee, issued a striking statement: “If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump administration are actively pushing to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none.” He added, “I will oppose the confirmation of any nominee for the Fed — including the upcoming Fed chair vacancy — until this legal matter is fully resolved.” Another Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski, endorsed that view, as did several Democrats.

    Further complicating matters, Mr. Trump’s attack on the Fed ensures that when a successor is eventually confirmed, he or she will have to do more to demonstrate independence, or else be remembered as the person who surrendered it. The Fed’s 11 other monetary-policy voters have increasingly been voting their own views. That is likely to accelerate if they feel that the new chair is just trying to please the president, rather than working in the best interests of the economy.

    We have a relatively rapid feedback mechanism to measure the success of economic policy: Markets and business leaders react in real time, in a way they do not on issues like immigration enforcement and whether to invade Greenland.

    The Fed is likely to win this battle. The broader war will probably continue as long as Mr. Trump remains president. One possible consequence is that the Fed becomes a victim of its own success, with people mistaking the markets’ mild initial response for proof that independence is no big deal. In reality, that calm reflects confidence in the defenses that were rapidly deployed: senators from both parties, former economic officials, the politically neutral judgment of markets themselves and ultimately the wisdom of the public.

    The greater risk is time. Independence will not be lost overnight, but at least every two years the president can nominate a new governor for the Fed. With sustained effort over six to eight years, an administration could gradually transform the institution. That would require patience from Mr. Trump and complacency from everyone else. So far, at least, on this issue we are seeing neither.

  • When Mr. Powell’s term as chair ends in May, he could stay on as a governor — and one of 12 voters on monetary policy — through January 2028. With threats intensifying, the case for his continued presence as a quiet but firm defender of Fed independence grows only stronger.
    We would be fortunate to have JPOW around for a few more years at the Fed.
  • Yes, he would. Or any former FED chair. They will appoint a person with no self-worth, and zero credibility. They will accept the job with nothing but public skepticism. Rates will come down, but it will not produce the intended effect of a more stable economy.

    Why the need for lower FED funds rates in a promised/proclaimed strong economy? Or is the economy bordering on problems? With ~3% annual inflation, what do lower rates bring? The textbook answers is more inflation.


  • edited January 12
    As was shown elsewhere, tariffs have killed 70,000 manufacturing jobs, starting in April, at the point of full implementation. Jobs in general have been dismal most of 2025. And Labor Force participation is falling.

    Meanwhile the stock market does what the stock market will do, it carries on despite politics. Until the combined weight of flawed policy, added taxation, supply chain disruption, job insecurity and poor sentiment, one day, flips the switch.

    That much is inevitable, but the timing is impossible to predict. In the short term, it will never matter. Prices will continue to rise all year. Even at 3%, voters will keep getting more frustrated. Housing costs will stay elevated. You don't fix a persistent supply shortage by lowering borrowing costs. Or deporting the labor force. Lower rates may even elevate prices. It has in the past.



  • The simple solution, ending tariffs and making nice with allies and trade partners, is not in their vocabulary. And should they wake up to this self-imposed destruction, it would be an admission of failure and weakness. Gaslighting is their only option. "Prices are not really rising". "Venezuelan oil will fix everything". "Military on suburban streets is necessary for national security". "It's the medias fault". Lots of other hokum.
  • edited January 12
    "If there were any remaining doubt whether advisers within the Trump Administration are actively pushing to end the independence of the Federal Reserve, there should now be none," Tillis said in a statement.

    These are the words of a GOP Congressman. Harsh words. Dark words. Meanwhile, the slow wildebeest will continue to focus on irrelevancies. It is to be expected.
Sign In or Register to comment.