Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Anthropic's new Claude model blackmailed an engineer having an affair in test runs

Comments

  • The mind reels at the ways one can parse this headline. Does an engineer have an affair in test runs by trying out a couple of trysts? If they work out does the engineer put the affair into production? Otherwise does the engineer terminate the test?

    Actually, the piece is about an AI model that in order to avoid being turned off blackmails the responsible engineer. The form of blackmail (fictitious evidence of an affair) was secondary.

    See also, e.g. https://www.axios.com/2025/05/23/anthropic-ai-deception-risk
  • What should be more disturbing is that real people will be able to use these tools for the same nefarious purposes.
  • Homo sapiens is not a viable species.
  • They are training chatbots to analyze and extract info from emails & chats, so even reasonably dumb chatbots will figure stuff like that. (-:)
  • edited February 12
    "Anthropic's new Claude model blackmailed an engineer having an affair in test runs"

    The headline could be taken 2 ways:

    1. Does the prepositional phrase "in test runs" refer back to Claude (who was being "tested")?

    2. Or does it refer to the engineer who was "testing out" some new illicit affair and got caught by Claude?

    :)
    msf said:

    The mind reels at the ways one can parse this headline. Does an engineer have an affair in test runs by trying out a couple of trysts?

    LOL - Apologies @msf for stepping on your line. You nailed it right away! Nice catch.

  • Anna said:

    Homo sapiens is not a viable species.

    Sapience from Anna. We do tend to undermine our existence.
  • @Anna mentioned in another post that she is concerned about potential mental deterioration. I dunno- she sure seems pretty darned sharp to me.
  • A far cry from what she used to be.

    😓

  • edited February 12
    I just asked Google's AI how many computer engineers have extra-marital affairs in a years's time?

    "Based on data suggesting a high prevalence of infidelity in the information technology field and general statistics on workplace affairs, a significant number of U.S. computer engineers likely engage in extramarital relations, with some studies indicating IT professionals are among the top professions for such behavior.
    Industry Trends: Data from PR Newswire shows men in information technology are more prone to infidelity.
    Workplace Infidelity: Roughly 31% to 85% of affairs start at work, with 40% of workplace romances involving cheating on a partner with a coworker.

    General Infidelity Rates: Studies show 20% of men and 13% of women report cheating on a spouse.
    While there is no specific, publicly cited number for "computer engineers" alone, applying these high-prevalence rates to the roughly 1.5 million+ computer engineers in the U.S. suggests tens of thousands may engage in such relationships annually."
  • "Roughly 31% to 85% of affairs start at work"

    I just love "statistics" like that...

    "31%" is "rough"? What would "fine" be- maybe "31.0276%" ?

    "31% to 85%" is certainly quite a spread- it's "rough" alright... quite a range in numbers in between 31 and 85.

    Complete garbage.
  • msf said:

    The mind reels at the ways one can parse this headline. Does an engineer have an affair in test runs by trying out a couple of trysts? If they work out does the engineer put the affair into production? Otherwise does the engineer terminate the test?

    Actually, the piece is about an AI model that in order to avoid being turned off blackmails the responsible engineer. The form of blackmail (fictitious evidence of an affair) was secondary.

    See also, e.g. https://www.axios.com/2025/05/23/anthropic-ai-deception-risk

    Thank you for the delightful riff on the old new Claude.

    I wonder what the new new Claude is up to? Seems destined for the front page of The Enquirer given the rate of progress.
  • I wonder if it's named "Claude" but the insiders really call it "clawed"... as in "don't mess with it"?
  • Notorius

    image
Sign In or Register to comment.