http://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-retiree-next-door--how-successful-retirees-stretch-their-savings--163042598.htmlI always enjoy reading these type of articles. I may have to check out the e book referenced in the link. I am completely debt free (no mortgage etc.) and always thought of myself as the master of frugality. But how in the world the married couple need only "$1000 a month to sustain their lifestyle" is beyond me. Heck, even the single guy living off his Social Security of $2170 a month seems a bit spartan to me. When I was younger I paid my dues. I scraped, saved, lived like a miser and worst. But now in my advanced age I would hate to live out however remaining years I have left forever worrying about budgets, monthly expenses, and outliving my nest egg.
Comments
Maybe something lost in translation here. Is that $1000 a month above basic necessities? It sure reads like they live on $1000 month or am I missing something? Edit: Maybe that is $1000 a month each or a total of $2000 a month for the couple.
Edit: PS Having read the link, I am more confused than ever. First, this person was drowning in debt. Later on it is revealed she has $250,000 in a retirement account. Somewhere in between lies the reason. The story fails to say how.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/17/us/politics/census-report-poverty-income.html?_r=0
Excerpt - "Poverty thresholds vary with the size and composition of a family. A family of four was classified as poor if its income was less than $23,830 last year; for one person, the threshold was $11,890."
Junkster, thanks for the story.
davidmoran, thanks for the rant.