Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

So, should I dump MSCFX Mairs & Power Small-Cap?

edited January 2018 in Fund Discussions
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MSCFX?p=MSCFX
Russell 2000 at new record high. What does MSCFX do? It's DOWN by 4 cents on the day. Sh..

If I dump it, I'd just roll the proceeds into MAPOX, the M & P Balanced Fund. That MSCFX was sprinting out of the gate when I got into it, in 2012. All things revert to the mean, I know. But I did not buy MSCFX to be a contrarian play. The Index soars today, and my fund is DOWN? That just stinks.

Comments

  • Hi Crash,
    Dump it! I use DISSX its an index and it beats this fund. Also, MAPOX is expensive on P/E and book in its space. If, and I say if I were going to invest in US, FLPSX would be it.....good P/E, book and it has cash. With 40% overseas, just saying......
    And, by the way, this was recommended by someone else on the board......sorry, I forget who. But they made a good call, just saying. Or, you could hold some cash also.
    God bless
    the Pudd
  • Kind of different.
  • edited January 2018
    @bartab not sure what you meant, there? @puddnhead: I'll keep MAPOX, the ER doesn't bother me. It's in the same category with PRWCX. But PRWCX writes stuff against its own holdings, now. That, I guess, is why it deserves the higher risk profile. MAPOX has proven itself to me: consistent, reliable, even if it does not light the world on fire. And I like the quarterlies. Thanks for chiming-in. Anyhow, I've got small-cap covered with PRDSX and VSCIX. ... And YES, I just pulled the trigger. In that fund family, all I own now is in MAPOX, as of tomorrow night.
  • I'm keeping my shares for now. The 4 cents one day loss represents .015 of the share price. That's not enough to bother me even on a day that the index goes up. MSCFX after all is not invested in the index.When the index goes down perhaps this fund will also not move in tandem. That's my 2, 4 cents.
  • I am holding mine and adding periodically
  • I'm holding too. I dumped FSCRX and bought MSCFX last year as Myers' retirement grew closer and I normally give funds at least a few years to make me happy before I'd consider dropping it for another. What I've been hoping for, for a number of years now, is Grandeur Peak's US small cap fund. I'm pretty confident they're just waiting for a time that looks opportune to register the fund but whenever that happens MSCFX will either be eliminated or at least limited to its then current value in my portfolio.
  • @LLJB: is a Grandeur Peak US small cap fund a pleasant personal idea or is it something you know has been discussed and planned by Grandeur Peak?
  • And today MSCFX is up higher than it was before it went lower. Not much of a roller coaster ride, just little rippling bumplets.
  • Yes, and MAPOX is down. A nice coincidence, that today was at least minimally advantageous, having already made the decision to sell MSCFX. When it was hot, I used it at year-end to feed profit into MAPOX. I did not do that this past December. Anyhow, I can say it served me well. My other two are simply doing better, and I'll continue to ride them. One is my wife's 403b. VSCIX and PRDSX. The first is an Index fund, the second is a quant fund, so they were never trying to do what Andrew Adams is doing at MSCFX.
  • Ben said:

    @LLJB: is a Grandeur Peak US small cap fund a pleasant personal idea or is it something you know has been discussed and planned by Grandeur Peak?

    @Ben, this from David's commentary roughly 6 months before Global Micro Cap and the Stalwarts funds were being launched, which was September/October 2015.

    "Funds in Registration

    This month our research associate David Welsch tracked down 14 no-load retail funds in registration, which represents our core interest. By far the most interest was stirred by the announcement of three new Grandeur Peak funds:
    Global Micro Cap
    International Stalwarts
    Global Stalwarts

    The launch of Global Micro Cap has been anticipated for a long time. Grandeur Peak announced two things early on: (1) that they had a firm wide strategy capacity of around $3 billion, and (2) they had seven funds in the works, including Global Micro, which were each allocated a set part of that capacity. Two of the seven projected funds (US Opportunities and Global Value) remain on the drawing board(emphasis mine). President Eric Huefner remarks that “Remaining nimble is critical for a small/micro cap manager to be world-class,” hence “we are terribly passionate about asset capping across the firm.”"


    There was another discussion in David's commentary or in a fund review earlier than that and it discussed their plans for funds and their strategy in far more depth but I wasn't able to find that again easily or I just wasn't willing to keep trying once I found the above. Most likely its the latter.

    I don't believe I've ever seen this information anywhere else but I have exchanged emails with the leadership at Grandeur Peak a handful of times over the years with questions about when we might see these and other funds. They've never said anything to make me question the validity of these intentions and their answer about when was that they wanted to get their teams comfortable with the funds they had already started and their process before they expanded further. It seems to me that goal should have been accomplished by now and the real reason is that they're waiting for a time they consider more opportune to launch the other funds they had planned and that's what I'm looking forward to.
  • @LLJB You're absolutely right about the planned funds. GP has been running paper portfolios in these strategies but has no immediate plans to launch them. The first would require a significant correction or change in the U.S. market, the latter, being synergistic to the firm, would require a certain collaboration and capacity in place before undertaking a launch. Good work on your part.
  • Thank you ever so much, LLJB & openice. Much appreciated.
Sign In or Register to comment.