Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.
  • Help with Rollover IRA at Price
    Hi folks,
    Just looking for your goodly wisdom. I'm retired and have a middle six figure 457 account (state gov't) that I just rolled into an IRA at Price (brokerage account). Took care of it online and over the phone in about an hour. Check's in the mail to me to forward. And yes, it's made out to them in my name.
    I wee bit of background. 66 and retired. Active investor for 30 years (e. g. I was buying with my retirement account on Black Friday; I moved all the cash and bonds in both my wife and my retirement accounts into equities when the first Gulf War broke out; I went bullish on gold and silver in 2002 and hit my first homerun with Silver Weaton SLW.) Note that I am a momentum investor as compared to buy & hold.
    I've got a DB pension and social security, no debt and wifey is about the same.
    Some of this IRA I plan to spend wantonly and with great abandon. Some I plan to leave to my estate. Some I'll play with for giggles. What I need to do is to protect and safeguard the majority while covering myself against most economic probabilities. If we start with the traditional allocation it would be something like 34/56/10 - equities, bonds, cash. If I include a speculation fund, let's call it 30/50/10/10.
    What percentage of int'l in each category?
    What equity funds to consider?
    What bond funds to consider?
    What external funds to consider? (i.e. this is a Brokerage account so I could buy a Matthews Asian fund if I wanted).
    Any and all suggestions are most welcome.
    and so it goes,
    peace,
    rono
  • Any funds which have preserved capital ?
    Howdy @Ted
    You noted: ", 2014 will be another year for equities, not bonds."
    I hope you are corrrect about the equity area; as that will help the other 50%.
    You are much more prescient than I in these matters. I'm sure we'll both be satisfied with our risk adjusted investments.
    Lastly, I now recall your note from a few weeks ago regarding a +25% for SPY this year; if my recall is correct. My fingers are crossed for the best.
    Hey, take care.
    Catch
  • Any funds which have preserved capital ?
    This year VNQ was a winner. Lost 2% during last downturn and gained 15% YTD.
    However long term VNQ and generally REIT funds underperform SPY.
  • Causeway Funds in registration
    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1156906/000119312514373975/d804455d497.htm
    497 1 d804455d497.htm CAUSEWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT TRUST
    Causeway International Opportunities Fund
    Institutional Class (CIOIX)
    Investor Class (CIOVX)
    SUPPLEMENT DATED OCTOBER 16, 2014
    TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 15, 2014
    THIS SUPPLEMENT PROVIDES NEW AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BEYOND THAT CONTAINED IN THE PROSPECTUS AND SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROSPECTUS.
    On October 15, 2014, the Causeway International Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”) converted from a “fund of funds” to a Fund making direct investments in securities. Effective as of the date hereof, the seventh paragraph under “Taxes” in the Prospectus is superseded and replaced in its entirety with:
    If you buy shares when the Fund has earned or realized, but not yet distributed, ordinary income or net capital gains, you will be “buying a dividend” by paying the full price of the shares and then receiving a portion of the price back in the form of a taxable distribution. You can avoid this situation by waiting to invest until after the record date for the distribution. The Fund expects to pay significantly increased taxable distributions of net short-term capital gain (that is, the excess of short-term capital gains over short-term capital losses) and net capital gain (that is, the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) in 2014 due to its conversion on October 15, 2014 from a “fund of funds” structure to directly investing in portfolio securities. This is because when it converted, the Fund redeemed shares in underlying Causeway Funds that had appreciated from the time the Fund purchased the shares, causing the Fund to realize capital gain during 2014. Taxable investors receiving the distributions should be prepared to pay taxes on them (at ordinary income rates for the net short-term capital gain and, for non-corporate shareholders, at the 15% and 20% maximum rates mentioned above for the net capital gain). However, if you are investing in the Fund through a tax-advantaged retirement plan or account, or are a tax-exempt investor, there will be no tax consequences to you from those distributions.
    PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.
    CCM-SK-022-0100
  • Any funds which have preserved capital ?
    Low volatility-focused funds are fairly good at preservation in a downturn, although they typically won't win much of anything in an upmarket. For one month, which pretty much captures the downturn since Sept. 18:
    VFIAX (Vanguard's S&P 500 index): -6.0
    SPLV: -1.7
    USMV: -2.5
    Those returns basically go with the territory, as there's quite a bit of overlap between low volatility and defensive (utilities and consumer staples, for example).
    Fyi, Vanguard has a new global 'minimum volatility' open-end fund, VMVFX, which ranks in the top 1% of world stock funds for the downturn (1 month) and top 5% year-to-date.
    Of course it's a new fund, and your mileage may vary -
  • Any funds which have preserved capital ?
    Let's not compress everything into one lousy week. For instance, YTD:
    WAFMX: +4.8%
    RHYPX: +1.8%
    RSIVX: +4.2%
    GASFX: +10.7%
    LSBRX: +4.2%
    AMHIX: +13.2%
    ACMVX: +4.5%
    PRBLX: +2.9%
    Figures are from yesterday, for the most part.
    Those are some of mine that are doing OK, and yes, I have another whole bunch that aren't.
  • Any funds which have preserved capital ?
    My better stock funds, 1 week returns as of Oct 15
    ICMAX: -1.11%
    RYSEX: -1.82%
    WAFMX: -1.51%
    Interestingly, they did better than my allocation funds
    FPACX: -2.92%
    OAKBX: -3.45%
    SGENX: -3.33%
    GLRBX: -1.84% (this is actually in my daughter's portfolio)
  • Any funds which have preserved capital ?
    @catch22: "Course, some of these may travel the other direction before the year is finished" You are correct, 2014 will be another year for equities, not bonds.
  • Any funds which have preserved capital ?
    The usual suspects: Cash, high quality bonds, and bearish funds like BEARX and HSGFX usually hold up much better during equity sell-offs. Those last two should be looking at 3-5% gains over the past 3-4 weeks. But that's just a guess. Haven't bothered to check. Gold has also held up well in recent weeks, rebounding from near $1200 to around $1240 today (but is still off big-time for the year). I'll note, FWIW, that Price's RPGAX which dabbles in hedge funds has held up better than some other balanced funds - but has still declined.
    I'm curious however as to the purpose of the question. To me it's very much an academic question in the sense that someone might include small portions of these funds for balance within a long-term oriented portfolio, but none (with the possible exception of RPGAX) look that attractive as core holdings. Just MHO. Thanks for the question.
    Here's a link to some top performers - one month. Enjoy :)
    http://www.barchart.com/funds/1month.php
  • Thursday the 16th. A less volatile day?
    I've decided to swap from CIPSX into HUSIX. CIPSX is low beta and has held up relatively well (down 6.8% YTD); HUSIX I think will be a better fund long term, but is down more (-13.7% YTD), so I've been waiting for this chance.
    It's a way for me to up my beta, keep my powder dry, and reduce the number of small cap funds I have to two (HUSIX and BRUSX.)
  • Thursday the 16th. A less volatile day?
    The 1850-ish support level (I still don't know where that comes from) has held, T rates are up, and energy (both fossil fuels and renewables) is getting a major bid.
    Wonder what'll happen in the next five minutes.
  • Barry Ritholtz: The Easy-Money Stock Market Is Over
    FYI: The change in tone in the equity markets is unmistakable: There is a palpable tension that leads some money managers to shoot first and ask questions later. The net result of that anxiety can be seen in the flood of new money into U.S Treasuries, which ever so briefly drove the yield on the 10 year to less than 2 percent yesterday.
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-10-16/the-easy-money-stock-market-is-over
  • Thursday the 16th. A less volatile day?
    Take yesterday (no on second thought, don't...)
    BAC reports 0.01 per share loss after 0.43 per share DoJ settlement.
    Eventually, that 0.43 expense will disappear, putting BAC in position to earn $1.68 per share per year profit. Which translates to $25 share price at 15 times earnings.
    The company just continues to get stronger and stronger. Moynihan is another CEO now chairman I really like, along with Kleinfeld at Alcoa.
    But the stock dropped nearly 6% to close in $15s.
    I had decided to buy more yesterday if it dropped under $15, which is my last purchase price. Still have that plan in place.
    Just crazy.
  • Thursday the 16th. A less volatile day?
    CNBC had a headline a few minutes ago that the Dow was down 200. The ticker showed -80. Now I just checked again. -134.
  • Thursday the 16th. A less volatile day?
    Replay of yesterday, looks like. This is getting old...
    image
  • Thursday the 16th. A less volatile day?
    Volatility this morning is remarkable. I'm seeing 50-100 point moves up/down in a matter of a few minutes.
  • Low-Beta Funds Better ? What To Do When SPY Is Falling
    FYI: When the stock market is falling, mutual funds with low beta — sensitivity to movements in the benchmark index — should do better, right?
    Not necessarily. Funds with the lowest 3-year beta have generated a variety of returns in the past three years and over shorter terms
    Regards,
    Ted
    http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTg1NjQ0OTI=
    Enlarged Graphic: http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=WMUTpent101614.gif&docId=722014&xmpSource=&width=1000&height=1152&caption=&id=721922