It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Hotels are seeking millions from S.F. for damage when they were homeless shelters.
Hotel Union Square’s cleanup bill was steep — $5.6 million to repair rampant smoke damage, broken light fixtures, mold and other problems.
As city supervisors consider shelling out millions to settle the dispute over damages at one of San Francisco’s hotel homeless shelters, taxpayers could be on the hook for millions more to settle similar claims from other hotels that participated in the program.
In September 2021, the owners of Hotel Union Square filed a claim with the city, alleging unhoused residents who the city had placed there had caused $5.6 million in damages — and cost the Dallas-based hotel operator hundreds of thousands more in lost rent.
City officials created the Hotel Program in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic and used it to house more than 3,700 high-risk residents in 25 hotels. With federal and state funding drying up, the city has gradually closed most of the hotels.
Your comment sounds like a pitch to be a buy and hold investor now. That seems a bit out of character for a well known trader.Lots of negativity on bonds here. I can understand the allure of cash when you can get 5.08% at firms like Schwab. Yet many bond funds are on pace for double digit returns in 2023. Albeit much of those gains were front loaded in January/February. There is even more negativity on commercial real estate. Yet one of the few pure plays on commercial real estate in the open end bond universe is doing just fine YTD and far outperforming cash.
As I said in a post on the Treasury thread, I don't agree with the terminology of Treasuries flooding the market. I read the Treasury article as a slow, gradual, introduction of shorter term securities, likely trying to avoid spooking the market. That could be good for slightly higher interest rate CDs, but also a trend of bonds gaining some traction. I keep expecting FR/BLs to become more "interesting".Read the YBB thread above. Doesn't bode well for bonds if Treasuries higher yield flood the market.
I agree with Derf's comments above that "flood" is not an accurate descriptive term. This statement, "Treasury plans to increase issuance of Treasury bills to continue financing the government and to gradually rebuild the cash balance over time to a level more consistent with Treasury’s cash balance policy. Initial increases in bill issuance will be focused on shorter-tenor benchmark securities and cash management bills (CMBs), including the introduction of a regular weekly 6-week CMB (the first of which will be announced on June 8)." I see phrases like "gradually rebuild cash balance" and "initial increases...will be focused on shorter-tenor...securities", as suggestive of slow and careful actions, not a "flooding" of issuance of Treasuries. I expect both Treasuries and CDs to reflect these more gradual increases, to not spook the market, and not lead to an unnecessary recession.Looks like the bond market will take a hit as a consequence. Gains made this year could be in jeopardy. Great...
Big changes from a week ago based on whether the debt-ceiling deal will pass which it did ! The bulls went from 29% to 40% in one week.AAII Sentiment Survey, 6/7/23
Vow! Bullish became the top sentiment (44.5%; above average) & bearish became the bottom sentiment (24.3%; below average); neutral remained the middle sentiment (31.2%; near average)
Not responsive to your specific question, but I have spent a few hours the last few weeks comparing RSP vs IVV and IVE, also VONE vs VONV, also the gaming value outliers SCHD and DIVO and CAPE.Anyone know if the concentration of holdings in a relative few companies is historically significant? I know the index is cap weighted but is todays concentration out of the ordinary? Thanks for your replies.
Crash, I understand. I am retired and focused on preserving principal, while making a decent TR with CD interest payments. After I retired, I focused on making 4 to 6% TR, but CDs paid nothing, and so I chose to focus on low risk bond oefs. Loved those years with PIMIX from which I collected monthly income payments that were very predictable and dependable. I had several other bond oefs that I did well with--SEMMX, VCFIX, NVHAX, etc. When the FEDs got serious about raising interest rates, bond oefs got less appealing to me, but CDs became attractive alternatives. I have no idea how long I can ride the CD gravy train, but for now, I will enjoy the stress free 5% returns during my "golden years". I keep watching Floating Rate Bank Loan funds, which I played with for a few years, and keep wondering when they will start benefiting from the rising interest rate period.DT: Good on ya. Can't tie up my $$$ for very long like that. Of course, I'm investing, and that's long-term. What you're doing with CDs, I'n doing with bond OEFs.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Mutual Fund Observer. All rights reserved. Powered by Vanilla