Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

Westinghouse Nukes

2»

Comments

  • Just bumped into this one:

    image
  • Y'all might enjoy this from 1947-1950. An Atomic Ring from KIX cereal. Just a tiny bit of radioactive ???
  • I recall plates and teacups in a glass display case at the museum back home, which deliberately contained radium. ORK.
  • beebee
    edited October 24
    Article states that China's nuclear ambitions far outpacing the rest of the world.

    Comment section of the article is worth a read.
    Actually, the United States is the global leader in the construction of cheap, safe, powerful nuclear reactors. They just happen to all be owned and operated by the United States Navy (563 reactors over the past 75 years, at last count.) So if the Navy and China can build reactors, but US power companies can't, we should probably look at why that is.

    One obvious reason seems to be that neither the US Navy, nor the Chinese nuclear program needs to satisfy shareholders. Since they don't have to constantly cut costs to drive up stock price, they can instead focus on good design and safe operation. (I would have loved to see a Navy bean counter try to tell Admiral Rickover that there wasn't any money in the budget for something he wanted.)

    It's unrestrained capitalism that causes the problem, not the technology.
    https://nytimes.com/interactive/2025/10/22/climate/china-us-nuclear-energy-race.html
Sign In or Register to comment.