Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Here's a statement of the obvious: The opinions expressed here are those of the participants, not those of the Mutual Fund Observer. We cannot vouch for the accuracy or appropriateness of any of it, though we do encourage civility and good humor.

    Support MFO

  • Donate through PayPal

So you thought investing in defense stocks was a good idea?

edited January 7 in Other Investing
Today Dear Leader is saying he can prevent defense companies from issuing dividends or buying back shares.

In other news he says he can prevent companies from buying single family homes,

Where does this authority come from, one might ask. But you know, it's just politics as usual, and should have no effect on your investing plans. But keep an eye on health care too

Comments

  • edited January 7
    Congress has lost it's spine, three Red clowns on the SC worship Cheeto and the other three give him a pass most of the time so...

    The genius of SC being a co-equal branch of Govt. but members being appointed by the other two branches and life tenure to boot. Oh wait.
  • The Supine Court.
  • Shouldn't they more appropriately now be called "war stocks" in keeping with the name change-over?
  • I'm holding out hope that the spineless GOP is waiting for it to get really ridicilous (no, I mean really, really before they act so that the whole populist fever collapses on its own, and they can swoop in to restore sanity. But, in reality, I'm not holding out much hope. I consider myself and equal opportunity cynic, and think that both parties have really let the electorate down.
  • Nope. I sold my US defense ETF (IDEF) a week or so ago when Dear Leader was first musing about "doing something" to influence the defense base. Glad I did that.

    My European defense ETF, by contrast, is doing juuuuuust fine.

    IMO this gives reason to invest more ex-USA for the forseeable future. First defense, then automakers, than oil companies, then......?
  • This is LMT just BEFORE the close and just AFTER. LinkedIn

    image
  • edited January 7

    This is LMT just BEFORE the close and just AFTER. LinkedIn

    image

    Yes, b/c Donnie's out with a big screed about how he (and the Congressional GQP) supposedly want to increase the defense budget by 50% in 2027 to 1.5T ... all the big names are markedly higher in the aftermarket.....
  • So, what accounts for (first) many 52-week highs, then significant drops, followed by big recoveries after hours?

    I am not getting it.
  • I guess free-market ideals were just a whim, a managed economy is better, like China.
  • vomit. Is he dead yet?
  • rforno said:

    This is LMT just BEFORE the close and just AFTER. LinkedIn

    image

    Yes, b/c Donnie's out with a big screed about how he (and the Congressional GQP) supposedly want to increase the defense budget by 50% in 2027 to 1.5T ... all the big names are markedly higher in the aftermarket.....
    I wonder if that's why bond futures are going up? Or is it down? Anyway, interest rates are bumping up.

    I also wonder how many people had their bets in place before the announcement.
  • "Today Dear Leader is saying he can prevent defense companies from issuing dividends or buying back shares."

    Confounding logic from the party of free market conservatives. Compound that logic even further in suggesting the desire to increase demand by doubling defense spending, as if the suppliers would simply roll over. Then, brazenly saying that use of force against Greenland - a NATO ally - may be necessary while being in conflict with the suppliers. Good grief!

  • its very simple, anytime trump whines about action against enterprise xyz, it's means MAGA friends&family want their cut directly or via lobby. ya think trump jr. will exit the drone startup because of this?

    dont overcomplicate.
  • edited 4:53PM
    Free market conservatives were never real things. Just a false image trotted out when convenient.

    A $1.5 trillion defense budget may be exactly what it takes to break the debt camel's back. Via the velocity of money, that should be very inflationary. Particularly with Bessent calling for lower rates, yet again. And devalue the dollar even further.

    I say, let's get this show on the road and make sure the full impact is arriving before November.
  • edited 6:40PM
    Exploding the War budget , as opposed to fixing Social Security or health care, really illustrates where this maga GOP is heading! Like flashing strobe lights of warning to all the folks who thought they were going to be helped with much higher costs brought on by tariffs.

    They were all useful idiots, who are to be discarded like yesterday's trash. Under Raygun's huge defense build-up, the national debt was actually tripled in only 8 years.
  • DrVenture said:

    Exploding the War budget , as opposed to fixing Social Security or health care, really illustrates where this maga GOP is heading! Like flashing strobe lights of warning to all the folks who thought they were going to be helped with much higher costs.

    There were all useful idiots, who are to be discarded like yesterday's trash. Under Raygun's huge defense build-up, the national debt was actually tripled in only 8 years.

    The GQP only understands 'hard' strength as a sign of national power -- ie, military and law enforcement. Things like public diplomacy, health care, education, reliable infrastructure, child support, etc. are elements of 'soft power' and aren't as made-for-tv glamorous for them. Plus there's little to no money in it for them.
  • Plus there's little to no money in it for them.

    That's all you need to know.
Sign In or Register to comment.